Tire Reviews presents possibly the least scientific tire test in the world - our first "long term subjective touring shootout."



165/65 R13 isn't a big tire, but with the increase in small wheeled EVs it could be a tire size of the future. With that in mind, and with a suitable test vehicle turning up in the car park (Ford KA) we bought 4 sets of tires and covered 30,000 miles across all surfaces and during all conditions to work out which tire is the best in the real world.

While commuting in a Ford KA isn't as glamorous as chucking an Audi R8 around a track in Portugal, the little KA has a dynamic chassis which both rewards a balanced tire and punishes a bad one.

On test we have one premium brand, a Continental Eco Contact 3, two mid range brands comprising of a Toyo 350 and Falken SN828 and a budget Nexen SB652. Can one of the lesser brands upset the order and topple the premium Contenental? Check out the totally un-scientific results below!

1st: Continental Eco Contact 3
165/65 R13 3PMSF: no	Total: 54 Dry: 10 Wet: 10 Subjective: 5 Comfort: 10 Noise: 10 Wear: 9 The Continental ECO Contact 3 was the surprise winner in 4 of the 6 categories. Not only did it manage to offer the best dry and wet grip, it was also the quitest tire, the most comfortable and offered better MPG than the others. It seems at least with tires, you do get what you pay for. The one draw back of the Continentals excellent ride quality and comfort was steering feel. The dynamic properties of the tire were poor, leaving you guessing what the tire was doing under you at times, with the old feeling of the tire folding onto the sidewalls under hard cornering. Read Reviews
2nd: Toyo 350
165/65 R13 3PMSF: no	Total: 46 Dry: 8 Wet: 7 Subjective: 10 Comfort: 5 Noise: 6 Wear: 10 What the Toyo 350 lacks in comfort, it makes up for with excellent steering response and feel. A great tire in both the wet and dry this is the tire we'd pick for a fun B-Road blast. Wore slightly better than the Conti too. The Toyo is mostly let down by it's comfort and noise. Read Reviews
3rd: Falken SN828
165/65 R13 3PMSF: no	Total: 41 Dry: 7 Wet: 7 Subjective: 8 Comfort: 6 Noise: 7 Wear: 6 The Falken SN828 isn't a million miles away from the Toyo in any area. Another strong tire with good dynamic abilities and reasonable grip. Wore slightly quicker than the Toyo and didn't quite have the ultimate grip, but very similar tires otherwise. Read Reviews
4th: Nexen SB652
165/65 R13 3PMSF: no	Total: 36 Dry: 5 Wet: 4 Subjective: 4 Comfort: 9 Noise: 7 Wear: 7 Surprisingly good in snow thanks to a blocky tread pattern. Fairly comfortable. The Nexen SB652 was the cheapest tire on test and it shows. The dry grip is average, the wet grip can be terrifying and it always leaves you second guessing as to whether it will grip or not. Not recommended. Read Reviews