2019 NAF Summer Tire Test

Test Publication:
Unknown
Test Size: 205/55 R16
Tires Tested: 8 tires
Test Categories:
4 categories (7 tests)
Similar Tests

Test Category Best Performer Worst Performer Difference
Dry (2 tests)
Dry Braking Continental Premium Contact 6: 34.6 M Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance: 36.3 M1.7 M (4.7%)
Dry Handling Continental Premium Contact 6: 108.52 s Michelin Primacy 4: 109.4 s0.9 s (0.8%)
Wet (3 tests)
Wet Braking Michelin Primacy 4: 49.1 M Bridgestone Turanza T005: 53.1 M4.0 M (7.5%)
Wet Handling Continental Premium Contact 6: 69.46 s Michelin Primacy 4: 71.14 s1.7 s (2.4%)
Straight Aqua Nokian Hakka Blue 2: 84 Km/H Continental Premium Contact 6: 79.8 Km/H4.2 Km/H (5.3%)
Comfort (1 tests)
Noise Bridgestone Turanza T005: 72.2 dB Michelin Primacy 4: 73.4 dB1.2 dB (1.6%)
Value (1 tests)
Rolling Resistance Bridgestone Turanza T005: 5.34 kg / t Nokian Hakka Blue 2: 5.62 kg / t0.3 kg / t (5.0%)
The Norwegian AutoMobile Federation (NAF) has tested seven summer tire patterns in 205/55 R16, and included a premium winter tire for comparison.

The winter tire performed surprisingly well during the wet braking testing, which was tested between 18 and 25c, beating the Dunlop and Bridgestone summer tires. Wet handling showed a little more weakness, with the winter tire finishing last, but it was still within a few percent of the summer tires.

As with all siped tires, the penalty came in the dry. Testing at 21-23c, the winter tire was at a huge disadvantage, stopping the car nearly 30% further on than the best summer tire on test, which is the difference between stopping safely, and having a huge accident! While the tire was closer during dry handling, it was still significantly slower than all the summer tires.

Let this test be a good reminder as to why we shouldn't run winter tires, or winter-bias all season tires across the dry summer months.

Full data below.

Dry

Wet

Environment

Results

1st: Continental Premium Contact 6

Continental Premium Contact 6
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking1st34.6 M100%
Dry Handling1st108.52 s100%
Wet Braking2nd50.5 M49.1 M+1.4 M97.23%
Wet Handling1st69.46 s100%
Straight Aqua7th79.8 Km/H84 Km/H-4.2 Km/H95%
Noise1st72.2 dB100%
Rolling Resistance3rd5.48 kg / t5.34 kg / t+0.14 kg / t97.45%
Excellent lateral stability on dry and wet surfaces, impressive braking performance, especially on dry surfaces, low noise.
The weakest resistance to aquaplaning.

Read Reviews    Buy from £79.99

2nd: Nokian Hakka Blue 2

Nokian Hakka Blue 2
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking6th36.1 M34.6 M+1.5 M95.84%
Dry Handling6th109.38 s108.52 s+0.86 s99.21%
Wet Braking3rd50.9 M49.1 M+1.8 M96.46%
Wet Handling4th70.18 s69.46 s+0.72 s98.97%
Straight Aqua1st84 Km/H100%
Noise5th72.8 dB72.2 dB+0.6 dB99.18%
Rolling Resistance7th5.62 kg / t5.34 kg / t+0.28 kg / t95.02%
Short braking distance, high lateral stability and good handling on wet surfaces.
Relatively long braking distance and insufficient dry handling, highest fuel consumption.

Read Reviews

3rd: Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Dunlop Sport BluResponse
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd35.6 M34.6 M+1 M97.19%
Dry Handling3rd109 s108.52 s+0.48 s99.56%
Wet Braking6th52.5 M49.1 M+3.4 M93.52%
Wet Handling5th70.38 s69.46 s+0.92 s98.69%
Straight Aqua3rd82.8 Km/H84 Km/H-1.2 Km/H98.57%
Noise3rd72.4 dB72.2 dB+0.2 dB99.72%
Rolling Resistance4th5.51 kg / t5.34 kg / t+0.17 kg / t96.91%
Accurate and fast reactions to steering, low noise.
Relatively long braking distance on wet roads.

Read Reviews    Buy from £70.03

3rd: Firestone RoadHawk

Firestone RoadHawk
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd35.6 M34.6 M+1 M97.19%
Dry Handling2nd108.94 s108.52 s+0.42 s99.61%
Wet Braking4th51.3 M49.1 M+2.2 M95.71%
Wet Handling2nd69.82 s69.46 s+0.36 s99.48%
Straight Aqua4th81.9 Km/H84 Km/H-2.1 Km/H97.5%
Noise3rd72.4 dB72.2 dB+0.2 dB99.72%
Rolling Resistance6th5.58 kg / t5.34 kg / t+0.24 kg / t95.7%
High lateral stability, quick steering, neutral balance.
High noise levels.

Read Reviews    Buy from £70.70

5th: Michelin Primacy 4

Michelin Primacy 4
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking5th35.9 M34.6 M+1.3 M96.38%
Dry Handling7th109.4 s108.52 s+0.88 s99.2%
Wet Braking1st49.1 M100%
Wet Handling7th71.14 s69.46 s+1.68 s97.64%
Straight Aqua2nd83.8 Km/H84 Km/H-0.2 Km/H99.76%
Noise7th73.4 dB72.2 dB+1.2 dB98.37%
Rolling Resistance5th5.57 kg / t5.34 kg / t+0.23 kg / t95.87%
Excellent braking performance.
Weak lateral stability.

Read Reviews    Buy from £86.67

6th: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking7th36.3 M34.6 M+1.7 M95.32%
Dry Handling5th109.31 s108.52 s+0.79 s99.28%
Wet Braking5th51.7 M49.1 M+2.6 M94.97%
Wet Handling6th71.09 s69.46 s+1.63 s97.71%
Straight Aqua5th81.8 Km/H84 Km/H-2.2 Km/H97.38%
Noise6th73 dB72.2 dB+0.8 dB98.9%
Rolling Resistance2nd5.39 kg / t5.34 kg / t+0.05 kg / t99.07%
Low fuel consumption, high aquaplaning resistance.
Weak lateral stability, understeer and long braking in the dry, elevated noise.

Read Reviews    Buy from £71.19

7th: Bridgestone Turanza T005

Bridgestone Turanza T005
  • 205/55 R16
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking2nd35.5 M34.6 M+0.9 M97.46%
Dry Handling4th109.01 s108.52 s+0.49 s99.55%
Wet Braking7th53.1 M49.1 M+4 M92.47%
Wet Handling3rd70.08 s69.46 s+0.62 s99.12%
Straight Aqua6th81.3 Km/H84 Km/H-2.7 Km/H96.79%
Noise1st72.2 dB100%
Rolling Resistance1st5.34 kg / t100%
Good handling and grip in the dry and wet, short dry braking distances.
Longest wet braking, low aquaplaning resistance, noise.

Read Reviews    Buy from £67.94

comments powered by Disqus