Dry Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 stopped the vehicle in 3.68% less distance than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Dry Braking: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was 0.2% faster around a lap than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was 1.07% faster around a lap than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 scored 3.06% more points than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 stopped the vehicle in 3.01% less distance than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Wet Braking: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 stopped the vehicle in 0.74% less distance than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 was 3.31% faster around a wet lap than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was 1.71% faster around a wet lap than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tires performed equally well

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 was 0.96% faster around a wet circle than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Wet Circle: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during five straight aqua tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 floated at a 6.67% higher speed than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Straight Aqua: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 slipped out at a 24.2% higher speed than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during six snow braking tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 stopped the vehicle in 2.46% less distance than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Snow Braking: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 accelerated 1.81% faster than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Snow Traction: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 had 0.21% better snow traction than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Snow Traction: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was 0.94% faster around a lap than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 was 0.65% faster around a lap than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed equally well in subj. snow handling tests.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Both tires performed equally well

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 was 3.02% faster through a slalom than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Snow Slalom: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Ice Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during two ice braking tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 stopped the vehicle 3.66% shorter than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Ice Braking: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 was better during one noise tests. On average the Giti GitiWinterW2 measured 0.47% quieter than the Kumho Winter Craft WP52.

Best In Noise: Giti GitiWinterW2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during two wear tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 is predicted to cover 14.2% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Wear: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during two value tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 proved to have a 15.57% better value based on price/1000km than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Value: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during two price tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 cost 4.75% less than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Price: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had a 6.67% lower rolling resistance than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Giti GitiWinterW2 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tires performed equally well

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 emitted 23.69% less particle wear matter than the Giti GitiWinterW2.

Best In Abrasion: Kumho Winter Craft WP52

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>