Bridgestone Potenza RE001 Reviews - Page 2

Given 76% while driving a Subaru legacy (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 120 average miles
OK, first of all these tires were made in three different factories when i purchased and i specifically purchased australian made in the first 4 i had, the aussie made tires had good all round grip in wet and dry but not as good as the japan made versions. both japan and aussie tires wore out the same time on a turbo awd subaru wagon. Now i got some thailand replacements which were absolutely rubbish and wore and twice as fast. this is with recommended rotation intervals. check to see where they are made and stay clear of the thailand versions.
Helpful 29 - tire reviewed on July 24, 2012
Given 83% while driving a SEAT Leon Cupra (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 300,000 spirited miles
Cornering is fantastic. Response is fantastik. You will feel like a pro.racer. But after 2 years it's compound gets harder and it looses it feature. On clean rainy tarmac it feels good but in rain soaked dusty asphalt ıt's not good. It becomes unpredictabel. Though for this price its the BEST!!
Helpful 28 - tire reviewed on April 7, 2012
Given 69% while driving a Subaru Impreza (215/45 R17 P) on mostly town for 90 average miles
Very good tires but gets really noisy.
Helpful 24 - tire reviewed on April 4, 2012
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 46% while driving a Lexus IS250SE (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Ok in the dry, but terrible in the wet. Have never really been a big fan of BS and this tire reminded me why.
Helpful 14 - tire reviewed on March 16, 2012
Given 57% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2.0 MIVEC (MAN) (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
Rubber compound is way too hard especially over speed bumps(even at slow speeds). I thought instead of doing the suspension...get a good all round tire first, but was dissapointed in the hard ride. Deflated tires to get a softer ride too sometimes. I know my Mitsubishi Lancer does not come fitted with the best suspension, but surely a tire could give a more comfortable ride. The stock tires is most probably the best for the vehicle. Viz. Yokohama ADVAN A-460 205/60/R16 92H.

MAYBE i SHOULD OPT FOR A YOKOHAMA PERFORMANCE TYRE THAT GIVES THE SAME CHARACTERISTIC AS THE A-460...BUT WHICH ONE?
Helpful 21 - tire reviewed on February 27, 2012
Given 81% while driving a Subaru 2008 subaru impreza sti (235/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
very good grip tires in the dry and wet ...but its abit noisy n bumpy...not comfortable at all.. overall satisfied with its life span .. 30+k km
Helpful 14 - tire reviewed on February 14, 2012
Given 80% while driving a Mazda Mazda2 (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 21,000 spirited miles
A revelation after Kumho KU31's - so much more grip in both wet and dry conditions and steering feel vastly improved - ride comfort reduced and a bit noisier but a bog standard Mazda 2 now feels like a hot hatch in cornering ability and braking - no really!!! Appear to be near the end of their tread wear but grip not at all affected - highly recommended.
Helpful 20 - tire reviewed on January 13, 2012
Given 86% while driving a Opel astra gsi (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 40 spirited miles
Nice tires
Helpful 15 - tire reviewed on October 11, 2011
Given 86% while driving a Holden Astra (215/40 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 27,688 spirited miles
Background: I am one of these guys that most would consider to be "crazy", in the sense that I started my driving years by buying from my Mum, a 1992 Mitsubishi Magna 2.6 auto that she bought new, and, liking its refinement and practicality but wanting better cornering, bought and installed a full Whiteline "the works" suspension kit (i.e. springs, shock absorbers...back when Whiteline still sell those! Plus rear swaybar, front strut brace, various alignment parts, etc.), and upgraded the tires from 185/75R14 Bridgestone B249's to 225/50R16 Dunlop SP Sport 3000A's to suit, when most people would just use the money to buy a better car to start off with. So in summary: this review is given from the point of view of someone who likes his creature comforts, but still values above all, cornering performance. I love having that extra grip reserve and using them, taking corners smoothly at a higher speed than others (but still within the speed limit), and yet without losing tire grip (and therefore, shortening their longevity).

Long story short: I eventually bought a 2003 Holden Astra TS SRi Turbo (aka Opel Astra G OPC) second hand. The Toyo Proxes 4 that came with it, with 20% tread depth remaining, were OK but could not handle any amount of torque once the turbo started kicking in, especially on any surface that is not completely dry. With 10% tread depth left, I had them replaced with new RE001's at 116,397km (mine were made in Japan, not Australia...not sure if that makes any difference!), and immediately noticed these were quieter, which I did not expect. Ride was a little harder, but the car was more responsive to steering inputs, which I prefer.

After 500km of gentle running to ensure I have scrubbed off all the slippery stuff on the tires (used to help them to more easily pop out of their moulds during their construction), I came across a right-hander in an unfamiliar road one night in the rain that turned out to be a lot sharper than what I was expecting. I quickly and smoothly dialled in more steering lock, hoping the car and tires would respond in ways that I thought for sure was not possible, and braced myself for what I thought would be the inevitable impact, and possibly me becoming a statistic. But the RE001's just pulled the car around the tighter arc as if it was on rails, as if I had always meant to take that corner that way that night. It was at that exact moment that I realised these RE001's were actually still working well within their limits, and are much better than most tires have any right to be. My expectations and confidence were raised quite dramatically from then on.

The car was eventually mildly modified with Eibach Pro Kit, Koni yellow shock absorbers, plus the full suite of Whiteline suspension parts. I've also swapped the factory alloys for the same size (17"x7.5"), but what seemed to me to be lighter, FOX R5 wheels (I think these are called FX5 in Europe). The changes, although by now making the ride more terse than I would like, have fully exploited the potential of these RE001's. To illustrate, there is a 3-lane 90-degree off-camber turn (for those in Sydney who are interested, it is the downhill left-hander on Victoria Road near the ANZAC Bridge if you were city-bound, and especially the uphill right-hander in the opposite direction) that most motorists would exceed the 60km/h speed limit on their approach in order to pass me, only to have to slow down significantly more than me by the time they hit the corner, allowing me to pass them easily as I take them anywhere from 40km/h+ in the wet to 50km/h+ in the dry, depending on my mood. All I have to do is to smoothly dial in as much steering lock as I need, and to try to keep the changes to the forward/backward momentum to a minimum throughout the turn. I have yet to meet a car and driver who can, or dare to, take that corner at anywhere near my speed. These people would then exceed the speed limit in order to pass me afterwards, but I see no intelligence or skill required in going fast in a straight line, with so many demerit points and penalty fees that can be accrued!

In terms of braking, I have only ever done one ABS-enabled stop with them from about 40km/h. It was in the dry, and it stopped the car about one car length sooner than I expected. My mechanic used the "Brake Testa" every year before the car's registration gets renewed, and it delivers maximum braking force of more than 1G every time. This was on standard brake lines, RBF600 brake fluid (good), RDA slotted disc rotors (very nice) and RDA brake pads (not very good). [It would brake even better with braided brake lines and QFM brake pads, but the former is a bit of an overkill for street use I think!]

So these tires fit my driving style perfectly, especially when they are kept at a pressure of 36-38psi (a little less at the rear unless I was carrying loads). Perhaps because of this, with the Astra having travelled 160,956km as at today i.e. 44,559km or almost 27,688 miles later, with rotation at every service, the fronts still have 10% tread depth, and the rears still have 20%. I find this especially remarkable for an ultra high performance summer tire. Compared to new, the noise did not seem to have worsened, and even the grip hardly reduced in the dry. In the wet, though, I have to be mindful these days of gentle understeer if I enter a sharp corner at a speed that is slightly ambitious. In these instances, I do not use the brake or accelerator during the turn, and the RE001's are still very forgiving, including no hint of any snap oversteer. I have yet to aquaplane/hydroplane these RE001's in the straights, even at these tread depths. Bridgestone claims the RE001's are designed to offer grippier compound as the tire wears out, and my observations seem to uphold their claim. In fact, these worn RE001's are definitely better than the similarly worn Proxes 4's that I had, in all areas.

I have since put new RE001's on my Mum's Mazda6 and my sister's Holden Barina XC (aka Opel Corsa C). That was 2 years ago, and both are very happy with their upgrades. So as long as you drive gently for the first 500km or so, and not drive like an absolute maniac all the time after that, I would not recommend any other tire. What you trade off in slightly worse ride comfort, you get back in dry and wet grip, perhaps in tire life and even in low running noise, as well as a level of confidence and assurance not many other street tires can provide, through the RE001's extra safety margin that is readily available in any emergency situation.

I have made many mistakes in my life (and most likely will make some more!), but definitely not when it comes to buying these fantastic RE001's, especially as they have saved my life at least once. The only reason I won't be buying these RE001's again, is because the newer (and according to Bridgestone's claims, even better) RE002's are now available!
Helpful 18 - tire reviewed on September 20, 2011
Given 71% while driving a Subaru Impreza (215/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 8,600 average miles
good Stability on wet road too...
Helpful 19 - tire reviewed on April 15, 2011
Given 74% while driving a Ford Focus ST (225/40 R18 W) on mostly motorways for 18 spirited miles
Very good tire. driven at high speeds, low milage.
Helpful 20 - tire reviewed on April 12, 2011
Given 43% while driving a Mitsubishi Magna VRX (225/50 R17) on mostly town for 7,000 easy going miles
An absolultely appalling tire. Three significant draw backs: wear, comfort, and wet weather performance.

On a 1500kg, 220hp front-drive car, lasted only 12000km with an easy driving style. Goodyear Eagle F1 GSD3 lasted over 50000km, Bridgestone Potenza GIII lasted a similar distance.

Stiff sidewalls were ok for initial turn-in, but crueled ride terribly.

But the killer was wet weather performance - it felt as though the tire rigidity increased about 4 fold when they hit a bump or road reflector in the wet. The one of the first significant drives I did when fitted was a highway drive in the wet, whenever the tires hit a road reflector the car would literally jump sideways. Performance was so poor, Bridgestone Australia replaced them with ER300 Turanza without an argument.

I would not recommend these tires, Goodyear Eagle GSD3 (though no longer sold) were a vastly superior tire in every respect except, perhaps, willingness on initial turn-in.
Helpful 14 - tire reviewed on April 8, 2011