Falken ZE912 Reviews - Page 8

Given 93% while driving a BMW 320D (255/35 R18 W) on mostly town for 500 average miles
brill value for money - much quieter than the oe run flats and a fraction of the cost. don't drive fast enough to comment on the handling at the limit, for day to day they are absolutely spot on - the oe's were nigh on £250 for each whereas these cost £440 for all 4!!
Helpful 7 - tire reviewed on January 16, 2012
Given 81% while driving a Honda MDX (235/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,500 average miles
Replacement for 0E Michelin's - car feels so much nicer - grip dramatically improved in both wet and dry conditions and ride comfort also better; previous squealing in tight cornering completely eliminated and noise levels much lower - seems to be a total win/win at a bargain price - too early comment on wear but initially seems acceptable - premium performance at a budget price - highly recommended.
Helpful 7 - tire reviewed on January 12, 2012
Given 53% while driving a Subaru Impreza (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 4,000 average miles
Bought these to replace 6 yr old OE Michelins. I'm hugely disappointed in them. Spent a great deal of time researching before I chose the Falkens, and had been delighted with the set on our runabout Polo. However on an Impreza beware. Firstly the softer sidewalls make the car wander and roll absurdly in corners to the point where I have lost any confidence in the cars handling. Main dealer checked car suspension which proved to be fine and fitted a set of Michelins on spare rims - the car regained its' (previously) excellent handling. Secondly I've never come across tires so sensitive to correct pressure settings and the effect that sudden changes in ambient teperatures can have on them. Thirdly the car has lost 10% of its' (previously excellent as I have a light right foot) mpg.
I'm not saying Falkens are poor tires (the Sinceras on our Polo are very good) but I am saying that on my Impreza they are an expensive disaster.
Helpful 8 - tire reviewed on January 6, 2012
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 97% while driving a Volkswagen golf 2.0 gt tdi (205/55 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Fitted for 60 quid per corner you just cant go wrong.

Dry grip is up there with the best of them, and in the wet they are decent, clear standing water well, and give lots of confidence on twisty country roads.

Have had these on for 3k and they still look like new, I never thought much of Falkens until now and I am pleasantly surprised.
Helpful 8 - tire reviewed on December 27, 2011
Given 90% while driving a Ford fiesta st (205/40 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
Bought a pair of these nearly 3 years back after my 1 year old Avon ZZ3 were down to the threads on the very inside of the tire! Thought it could have been something out of line - but after getting checked, all seemed ok, and Falkens have been spot on (won't be buying Avons again!). Wasn't my driving either, as I was being careful the first year of owning the car.

Purchased a second pair to get a complete set around a year, to 2 years ago. Excellent tires. Loads more grip than the Avon ZZ3 and Pirelli PZero Nero tires my car came with. Was getting understear and losing traction in some fairly sharp, low speed corners, even in the dry - which I couldn't understand. Falkens have been ace. I've done over 10,000 on the first pair and around 6 or 7 on the second. Wear seems to be pretty even and good so far, even though now I drive with a bit more 'spirit'.

Survived a 6 hour snow journey last christmas. Obviously nothing is going to be great in the snow, ice and sludge. But I think they did really well. Managed to drag herself up 'slip'roads where lorries and other cars were struggling. Got to my destination after surviving the dangers of the M4 and M5.

Back to normal conditions, you can feel the road under you - which I like, but also quite comfortable on most roads.

Will most likely be buying again. Fiesta ST 150. £62 - £67 each
Helpful 7 - tire reviewed on December 19, 2011
Given 40% while driving a SEAT (225/45 R17 W) on mostly motorways for 11,000 spirited miles
I've never had tires wear so quick as these Just over 10000 miles down to 2mm tread depth. Not the best tires all round average performance.

Used Falkens before another model can't remember exact tire but bought these on strength of previous ones not as good this time.

£84 each from Macsams. on-line.
Helpful 7 - tire reviewed on December 14, 2011
Given 86% while driving a SEAT Leon Cupra (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 200 average miles
Recently replaced the Pirelli P6000 on the front. The Pirelli's had been ok, but they did under steer on spirited drives, especially in the wet.
I read lots of reviews on this site and was looking for some midrange tires to replace them, making a decision on the Falken Ze912 based on the reviews.
I have not been disappointed - good grip in dry and especially wet, they are positive and progressive. Not run them in for many miles but pleased with them so far - not really able to comment on wear yet.
Helpful 8 - tire reviewed on December 12, 2011
Given 81% while driving a Jaguar XJ6 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 0 spirited miles
Had these on my '07 525M sport Auto and was pleasently surprised how good these where, wet weather grip however was a tad less but thank god for traction control! Quieiter, better ride and also much better in the snow then the standard fittment tires as well as I was able to move forward and get traction...the treads cleared with every rotation. I have now fitted these to my XJ 2.7 TDVI and will report soon how i find them, hopefully I am as pleased as when I fitted them to the 19" on my beemer.
Helpful 8 - tire reviewed on December 8, 2011
Given 93% while driving a Alfa Romeo 156 GTA (with Q2) (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Fitted 4 of these to a Alfa 156 GTA. Initially I thought they lacked a bit of grip but after a few hundred miles of scrubbing the finish off them they are very good for both dry and wet grip levels. They are also very quiet and comfortable, maybe a little too comfy for some, there is more isolation from road imperfections then you would get with, say, a Goodyear F1, or Michelin PS2. As a so called mid-range tire, they easily embarrass many high end ones, but at an unbelielevably good price. As others have said, no brainer.
Helpful 7 - tire reviewed on December 8, 2011
Given 47% while driving a Nissan Murano (235/65 R18) on mostly motorways for 14,000 average miles
Noisy if compared to previous tires I used. Grip, high speed handling are also not to my expectation. Will use other brand of product next time.
Helpful 8 - tire reviewed on December 7, 2011
Given 99% while driving a Renault Megane RenaultSport Cup (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 14,000 spirited miles
Just replaced a set of these with a second set of 4!!
(I was using Yoko Parada Spec 2's in the slightly narrower 225/40 but they were too much of a compromise in the wet!)

Based on the previous reviews on here I bought a set and was delighted with the result!
I have driven an assortment of cars over the last 15yrs from quick to savage and have tried everything from the high-end barely legal track tires down to the higher end budgets like Nankang and I have to say these are brilliant as good as the Michelin PS2's that came on the car and far better than the Dunlop SPORTMAXX TT's on after that.

If you buy a set (and set the pressures right) you won't be disappointed!!
Helpful 8 - tire reviewed on December 2, 2011
Given 84% while driving a Mercedes Benz C200 CDI Est Blue Efficiency (245/40 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
Replacement rears for the Michelin Primacy HP originals. I researched more than in past (and found this site very useful), reflection of looking for value for money and concern at moving from Mercedes recommended 'MO' tires (i.e. big names at big money) and that the car is rear wheel drive. Michelins did not last well on rears.

These are a great buy - solid all round performance. Car is not driven hard in hilly twisty Devon roads, so don't know about 'limit of grip', 'progressivenebss' etc. Grip in dry and wet is good/excellent - may be slightly less than Mich, G Years, Bridges etc etc, but any sensible driver would not know, and even if driving briskly they show no weakness.

Were £106 a tire, vs about £150-175 for top names.

Only advice would be to check on fuel economy - may give up a little, but suspect only 2-3 mpg when tires cold in urban driving. Out on M5 returned 50-55 mpg at various motorway speeds (65-80mph).

Too early to judge wear, but will report as tire ages.
Helpful 7 - tire reviewed on November 28, 2011