Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

The Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tire review data from 13 tire reviews averaging 70% over 47,160 miles driven, and 14 tests with an average result of 8th.

Dry Grip 79%
Wet Grip 77%
Road Feedback 75%
Handling 73%
Wear 58%
Comfort 69%
Buy again 60%

First On MarketSeptember 2020
Wheel Size16 - 22"
Width195 - 315mm
Profile30 - 65
Rolling ResistanceA - D
Wet GripA - C
Noise (dB)68 - 75
Winter RatingNot Winter Rated

The N Fera Sport SU2 is ranked 91st of 145 Summer Ultra High Performance tires.

This tire replaced the Nexen N Fera SU1.

Tests Included

14

Best Result

1st

Worst Result

17th

Average Result

8th

Latest Tire Test Results

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
17th of 21 tires
  • Short dry braking distances, quiet rolling noise, moderate price.
  • Understeering handling behavior, only average mileage.
View Full Test >>
2023 AZ UHP Summer Tire Test
7th of 10 tires
  • The Nexen N'Fera Sport SU2 doesn't set any highlights, but it delivers decent results and shows no major weaknesses. That's not enough for a good placement, but considering the price it's ok.
View Full Test >>

SizeFuelWetNoise
17 inch
225/60R17 99 YAB69
215/45R17 91 Y XLAB69
225/45R17 91 YBA69
225/45R17 91 WBA69
225/45R17 94 W XLAB71
225/45R17 91 YCA71
18 inch
225/40R18 92 Y XLBA71
235/60R18 107 V XLAB72
225/40R18 92 Y XLCA69
225/40R18 92 Y XLCA71
20 inch
255/45R20 105 Y XLAB69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 >>

Questions and Answers for the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

2019-09-28 - Does this tire even exist ? An internet search refrences a global launch and there is a video on YT. My local Nexen supplier (the Nexen brand seeming[y his biggest seller) states he has never heard of the SU2.& the next performance orientated nexen tire for release in 2020 will simply be called "sport" I have emailed nexen europe but no reply as yet.. Could do some digging using your industry contacts ?

The tire was announced in Germany this year, but I'm not sure if / when it's due to go into production. I'll drop Nexen a message!


Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top 3 Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Reviews

Given 93% while driving a BMW 318d M Sport Touring (E91) (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Insane dry handling and wet handling! Very good tire for cool amount of money :D
Helpful 132 - tire reviewed on August 10, 2020
Given 90% while driving a Hyundai i30 (215/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 1,500 spirited miles
+ Being 40-50% cheaper than michelin and continental +good dry grip trashing the car around the corners until it overheats
Helpful 63 - tire reviewed on March 17, 2022
Citroën (245/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Bought my ds5 180 auto with these on it, I was a little bit unsure of what to expect as I had no experience of the brand but they're excellent, I'd definitely buy them next time. Quiet, grippy, not sure how they'll wear but that's a secondary consideration as the quality is there at a much lower price than original fitment.
Helpful 83 - tire reviewed on November 4, 2020
Have you driven on the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 tire?

Have YOU got experience with the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2? Help millions of other tire buyers

Review your Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 >

Latest Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Reviews

Given 64% while driving a Volkswagen Golf MK8 1.5 Style (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
The tires came with the car out of the factory and let me start with saying that they are OK, especially at the price point. I have driven better tires, however.

Dry grip is adequate, however, the rubber compound is extremely soft, for a summer performance tire and they squirm a bit under hard cornering. On the other hand the carcass is rather stiff on W speed rated tires and it rides badly. Comfort is pretty mediocre, both ride quality and tire noise are, well, bad.

Wet performance seems to be better than dry - I guess the soft compound is better in the wet when temperatures are lower, which again is strange for a summer performance tire.

Tire wear seems to be normal so far - about 1 mm of wear in 12 000 km, which is about what I get with most tires.

Overall the tire is decent for how cheap it is and it's certainly far better than some chinese ditch finder, but don't expect best in class performance for 1/3 of the price.
Helpful 0 - tire reviewed on September 1, 2024
Given 80% while driving a Peugeot 308 1.6 e HDI (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 5,000 average miles
Good tire as usual Nexen and Kumho are great choices for tires, my theory is buy a new tire every 2max 3 years to be on safe properties otherwise risk not worthed in case of emergency.
Helpful 17 - tire reviewed on October 29, 2023
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 63% while driving a SEAT LEON 1.8TSI (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10 easy going miles
When I bought my car was with Conti 5. I changed them with Bridgestone Potenza and the last change was with Nexen.
In first I was excited! There was no noise. The handling was very good and when I thought that I spend 280 euros (400+ was needed for premium tires) for a vfm buy.
After 20.000km with speeds never exceed 120km, economy and safe driving (no hard accelerations, brakes or cornering) because of a newborn I saw that almost I need new tires. Spinning, ABS and TCS engagement occurs too often and you can see why in the tires. And the finally verdict against them was a huge crack in the internal side of the one tire which was discovered when the warning light for tire pressure light up and I move to the tire shop to check it.
For me it's a "never again" it's a dangerous tire and this kind of failure as I can read is something almost common.
Helpful 30 - tire reviewed on September 14, 2023
Given 56% while driving a Audi A3 Sportback (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 7,000 average miles
This tire was fitted on my Audi A3 8Y Sportback from factory. Handling on dry and wet was 'good', but nothing mindblowing. Wear was really bad though. What's even worse, tire got serious damage at its shoulder ribs after ~7000km which ended up being just "bad material / quality control from factory", as it was explained to me by the guy who replaced them. I would never buy them again, for safety reasons.
Helpful 23 - tire reviewed on August 8, 2023
Given 39% while driving a SEAT Leon (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 2,150 easy going miles
Had them straight from car factory started to crack between the tread after 2150 miles
Helpful 23 - tire reviewed on August 6, 2023
Given 76% while driving a Nissan Qashqai (215/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Compared to Michelin they are "OK".. Not sth fancy. Cornering is good , braking is medium but comfort and economy is bad. In an suv I can feel every road imperfection. Bad performance when it's cold.
Helpful 34 - tire reviewed on March 8, 2023
Given 59% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI (225/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 9,000 spirited miles
Decided to buy a set to replace some Falken, pushed by dealer . They are OEM on Porsche and very cheap. Don’t know how they managed to get factory fitted on the german supercars, as they are “just ok”. At the orice point, probably a few other brands I would have considered. And wear seems to be horrible. Cheap yes, but I feel in the long run it is going to cost me more. Not recommended.
Helpful 29 - tire reviewed on November 26, 2022
Given 84% while driving a Audi 1.8T Quattro (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
240kmh in rain no problem, 200kmh cornering in dry also not a problem.(understeer is easily controlable and predictable). Wear is a bit quicker but not a big problem since tire is not that expensive
Helpful 43 - tire reviewed on April 28, 2022