2023 Tire Reviews Best Summer Tires

In this test, we'll be finding out what the best premium touring summer tires on the market are!

I'm going to try and keep this as condensed as I possibly can as we have 13 sets of tires in this test including the newest and best from Continental, Michelin, Hankook, Pirelli, Bridgestone, Vredestein, Kumho, Toyo, Nankang and more! This should also be the world's first test of the Continental PremiumContact 7!

So what are we testing? Premium touring tires are also called comfort bias tires, or normal tires, or high performance tires, but whatever you call them, they're the tires most people use day to day on their normal, non sports car, vehicles. They focus on high levels of safety in the dry and wet, good levels of comfort, low noise, and low energy use to save you money at the pumps, or extend your battery range. In fact, while none of these tires are EV specific, some of them are marked "EV ready" meaning they've been designed with both internal combustion and electric vehicles in mind.

Test Publication:
Tire Reviews
Test Size: 205/55 R16
Tires Tested: 13 tires
Test Categories:
4 categories (13 tests)
Similar Tests

Test Category Best Performer Worst Performer Difference
Dry (3 tests)
Dry Braking Continental PremiumContact 7: 35.27 M Double-Coin DC99: 39.62 M4.3 M (11.0%)
Dry Handling Kumho Ecsta HS52: 51.58 s Double-Coin DC99: 53.39 s1.8 s (3.4%)
Subj. Dry Handling Continental PremiumContact 7: 100 Points Double-Coin DC99: 30 Points70.0 Points (233.3%)
Wet (6 tests)
Wet Braking Continental PremiumContact 7: 31.58 M Double-Coin DC99: 46.04 M14.5 M (31.4%)
Wet Handling Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2: 84.81 s Double-Coin DC99: 96.27 s11.5 s (11.9%)
Subj. Wet Handling Continental PremiumContact 7: 100 Points Double-Coin DC99: 50 Points50.0 Points (100.0%)
Wet Circle Continental PremiumContact 7: 11.5 s Double-Coin DC99: 12.84 s1.3 s (10.4%)
Straight Aqua Vredestein Ultrac: 80.78 Km/H Double-Coin DC99: 64.55 Km/H16.2 Km/H (25.1%)
Curved Aquaplaning Vredestein Ultrac: 3.7 m/sec2 Double-Coin DC99: 2.28 m/sec21.4 m/sec2 (62.3%)
Comfort (2 tests)
Subj. Comfort Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 100 Points Double-Coin DC99: 90 Points10.0 Points (11.1%)
Noise Double-Coin DC99: 70.2 dB Hankook Ventus Prime 4: 72.8 dB2.6 dB (3.6%)
Value (2 tests)
Price Double-Coin DC99: 50.12 Continental PremiumContact 7: 99.69 49.6 (49.7%)
Rolling Resistance Bridgestone Turanza T005: 6.76 kg / t Nankang Econex NA1: 9.18 kg / t2.4 kg / t (26.4%)

Wet

Wet handling is both very important, and should be where premium tires really make the difference, and once again this has been the case.

The cheapest tire on test, the Doublecoin, was a disaster in terms of grip and steering and feedback. The Nankang was also pretty bad, it felt ok at first, and certainly had more grip than the Doublecoin, but there was a lot more oversteer with this tire than any other tire. It always amazes me how much a tire can change the balance of a vehicle, we have tires in this group which give huge amounts of understeer, all the way to oversteer at every turn, all on a 1.5 litre basic FWD Golf!

Now those two are out of the way, everything else ranges from good to excellent for both grip and subjective handling.

The GT Radial might not have been the quickest of the group, but subjectively it was up there with lovely steering and a nice predictable balance.

In the battle of the old school midrange brands, which i think of as Falken, Kumho, Toyo, Vredestein, Vredestein was the best as it was just a tenth of the very best round the lap and had a huge grip advantage when driving, even if the handling was a little numb. It wasn't the most fun to drive though, of the three in the wet, the most fun was the Toyo.

Hankook and Bridgestone finished close on time, but felt quite different to drive. The Hankook was enjoyable and predictable, but it just picked up a bit too much mid corner understeer, but the Bridgestone wasn't really an enjoyable tire to drive, good grip but just a lot of poorly communicated understeer mid corner. But understeer is safe, and is the balance the Michelin subscribes to too. 

Of the remaining three tires we've not talked about, the Goodyear felt it had quite a lot of sidewall deflection on initial turn but the grip built up nicely and there was lots of grip from the front axle which made for a quick tire. The Pirelli and the new Continental were some of the most dynamic, fun, and the fastest. 

This is particularly good news for the new Continental as the previous tire, the PremiumContact 6 was always one of the best in the dry, but in my tests I never got on with it in the wet, so good job Continental on the new product, but also you have to be impressed by the Pirelli and Goodyear, which aren't the youngest tires anymore but still performing very well, and of course the outstanding grip of the Vredestein.

Continental had a small lead over the Michelin and Pirelli during the wet braking tests.

The impressive Vredestein Ultrac was the best tire in straight aquaplaning, closely followed by the Falken and Michelin. The curved aquaplaning results can be found at the bottom of the page.

Dry

Naturally dry handling isn't a key factor for these tires, and given it's quite a short course and the Golf doesn't have a huge amount of power, the times are very close. Subjectively, there are more differences.

Each set of tires was tested below the limit for steering response and linearity, and put through multiple aggressive lane change maneuvers to test the stability of the tires in emergency situations, and of course around the handling lap. The good news is that apart from the Doublecoin and possibly the Nankang, all the tires passed the lane change test with flying colors. The Doublecoin was a total mess all round, and the Nankang just had a little too much oversteer.

If we cross reference dry braking and dry handling, overall the Continental had a small grip lead in the dry, followed by Bridgestone, Kumho, Pirelli and Hankook.

As for the balance and driveability of the tires, well that's a bit more of a tricky as a lot of them are very similar, but there are still some standouts. 

If you want a cheap 16" track day tire the Nankang offers good grip, and while it had too much oversteer for perhaps the ideal balance on the road, it was a fun challenge on track. 

Like in the wet the GT Radial was very good dynamically, even if it couldn't match the fastest in terms of grip, and the Kumho and Pirelli were really really good all round. But, by the smallest of margins, I'm happy to report that the Continental PremiumContact 7 was once again my favorite in the dry as it had the crispest steering, the steering built up forces beautifully and it was of the tires you really enjoyed driving.

Environment

The rolling resistance, which is how much the tire impacts your energy or fuel use, was a huge win for the Bridgestone Turanza T005 - it was over 10% better than the next best tire. Given how well it performed in all other categories, this is a very impressive combination of abilities. Goodyear placed second with the EfficientGrip Performance 2 living up to its name, and Toyo was third.

Noise and comfort was, as usual, very close. The budget tire was actually the quietest on test with the lowest passby noise, but in the car it was less refined and the least comfortable of the group. While all the other tires were incredibly close, if noise and comfort is really your thing, the Michelin Primacy 4+ or Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 have the smallest of edges over the field in my opinion.

The Doublecoin was the cheapest tire on test and the new Continental the most expensive.

Results

1st: Continental PremiumContact 7

Continental PremiumContact 7
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • Weight: 8.61kgs
  • Tread: 7.5mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking1st35.27 M100%
Dry Handling2nd51.73 s51.58 s+0.15 s99.71%
Subj. Dry Handling1st100 Points100%
Wet Braking1st31.58 M100%
Wet Handling2nd84.85 s84.81 s+0.04 s99.95%
Subj. Wet Handling1st100 Points100%
Wet Circle1st11.5 s100%
Straight Aqua8th74.91 Km/H80.78 Km/H-5.87 Km/H92.73%
Curved Aquaplaning7th3.3 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.4 m/sec289.19%
Subj. Comfort9th92 Points100 Points-8 Points92%
Noise11th72.2 dB70.2 dB+2 dB97.23%
Price13th99.69 50.12 +49.57 50.28%
Rolling Resistance8th8.38 kg / t6.76 kg / t+1.62 kg / t80.67%
Highest level of wet grip overall, clear lead in wet braking with joint fastest wet handling, shortest dry braking and best dry handling.
Average rolling resistance, average aquaplaning resistance, increased external noise.
Once again Continental have dropped a new tire to the market, and seriously moved the game on, most noticeably in the wet. Last year it was the SportContact 7, this year it's the PremiumContact 7.

This tire had a huge lead in wet braking, was joint fastest around wet handling, and had the fastest wet circle lap. Thankfully, it also kept most of the dry handling character I loved of the PremiumContact 6 and was excellent on the brakes. It wasn't a flawless run, it was pretty average in aquaplaning resistance, external noise and rolling resistance, but the lead it had in the grip categories led it to a dominating win. Yes, it is the newest tire, and yes, based on this test, its also the best.


Read Reviews    Buy from £93.43

2nd: Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/69
  • Weight: 8.6kgs
  • Tread: 7.3mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd35.74 M35.27 M+0.47 M98.68%
Dry Handling8th52.26 s51.58 s+0.68 s98.7%
Subj. Dry Handling2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Wet Braking3rd32.91 M31.58 M+1.33 M95.96%
Wet Handling4th85.31 s84.81 s+0.5 s99.41%
Subj. Wet Handling1st100 Points100%
Wet Circle5th11.68 s11.5 s+0.18 s98.46%
Straight Aqua6th75.33 Km/H80.78 Km/H-5.45 Km/H93.25%
Curved Aquaplaning10th3.19 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.51 m/sec286.22%
Subj. Comfort2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Noise3rd70.4 dB70.2 dB+0.2 dB99.72%
Price7th81.39 50.12 +31.27 61.58%
Rolling Resistance4th8.22 kg / t6.76 kg / t+1.46 kg / t82.24%
Very well balanced tire, excellent in the dry and wet, low noise, good levels of comfort, low rolling resistance.
Average aquaplaning resistance.
The Pirelli Cinturato P7 has clearly had a significant update since I last tested it, and boy it seems to have worked. While the tire didn't win any of the twelve categories we score on, its only real weakness was curved aquaplaning. In every other test it was within a few percent of the best, and subjectively a well balanced tire to drive too. It's a big step forward for the Italian brand, and one I'm happy to highly recommend.


Read Reviews    Buy from £88.09

3rd: Bridgestone Turanza T005

Bridgestone Turanza T005
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: B/A/71
  • Weight: 7.7kgs
  • Tread: 7.2mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking2nd35.29 M35.27 M+0.02 M99.94%
Dry Handling10th52.36 s51.58 s+0.78 s98.51%
Subj. Dry Handling7th85 Points100 Points-15 Points85%
Wet Braking8th34.94 M31.58 M+3.36 M90.38%
Wet Handling6th86.21 s84.81 s+1.4 s98.38%
Subj. Wet Handling10th90 Points100 Points-10 Points90%
Wet Circle3rd11.6 s11.5 s+0.1 s99.14%
Straight Aqua5th75.47 Km/H80.78 Km/H-5.31 Km/H93.43%
Curved Aquaplaning6th3.33 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.37 m/sec290%
Subj. Comfort2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Noise12th72.4 dB70.2 dB+2.2 dB96.96%
Price9th89.19 50.12 +39.07 56.19%
Rolling Resistance1st6.76 kg / t100%
Ok wet grip, good aquaplaning resistance, very good dry braking, extremely low rolling resistance.
Extended wet braking, sluggish dry handling, high external noise.
The Bridgestone lost a few points for wet braking, where it was pretty average, and dry handling where it felt sluggish and down on grip of the best, but this tire absolutely crushed the rolling resistance test, a full 15% better than the second best tire, which was the Goodyear. IF you drive an EV or plug in hybrid, this might be the best of the group. Highly recommended.


Read Reviews    Buy from £67.94

4th: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: B/A/69
  • Weight: 8.2kgs
  • Tread: 8.2mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking8th36.31 M35.27 M+1.04 M97.14%
Dry Handling4th51.85 s51.58 s+0.27 s99.48%
Subj. Dry Handling4th90 Points100 Points-10 Points90%
Wet Braking6th34.34 M31.58 M+2.76 M91.96%
Wet Handling1st84.81 s100%
Subj. Wet Handling5th95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Wet Circle2nd11.57 s11.5 s+0.07 s99.39%
Straight Aqua7th74.98 Km/H80.78 Km/H-5.8 Km/H92.82%
Curved Aquaplaning4th3.4 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.3 m/sec291.89%
Subj. Comfort2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Noise5th70.8 dB70.2 dB+0.6 dB99.15%
Price12th96.39 50.12 +46.27 52%
Rolling Resistance2nd7.52 kg / t6.76 kg / t+0.76 kg / t89.89%
Very well balanced tire, excellent wet handling, great dry handling, low noise, good levels of comfort, low rolling resistance.
Slightly average aquaplaning resistance, extended dry braking.
The Goodyear was fantastic in both handling tests, proving to be the joint fastest tire around wet handling. It was also quiet and comfortable, with a very low rolling resistance. highly recommended, another really well balanced tire from Goodyear.


Read Reviews    Buy from £70.62

5th: Michelin Primacy 4+

Michelin Primacy 4 Plus
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/69
  • Weight: 8.8kgs
  • Tread: 7.4mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking10th36.58 M35.27 M+1.31 M96.42%
Dry Handling12th52.6 s51.58 s+1.02 s98.06%
Subj. Dry Handling7th85 Points100 Points-15 Points85%
Wet Braking2nd32.88 M31.58 M+1.3 M96.05%
Wet Handling5th85.72 s84.81 s+0.91 s98.94%
Subj. Wet Handling5th95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Wet Circle11th11.89 s11.5 s+0.39 s96.72%
Straight Aqua3rd78.18 Km/H80.78 Km/H-2.6 Km/H96.78%
Curved Aquaplaning3rd3.42 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.28 m/sec292.43%
Subj. Comfort2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Noise2nd70.3 dB70.2 dB+0.1 dB99.86%
Price11th93.89 50.12 +43.77 53.38%
Rolling Resistance5th8.24 kg / t6.76 kg / t+1.48 kg / t82.04%
Excellent wet grip with very short wet braking and good wet handling, very high aquaplaning resistance, low noise, high levels of comfort, low rolling resistance.
Sluggish dry handling with limited grip in handling and braking.
The Michelin Primacy 4+ wasn't quite as sharp as the Kumho, or any of the tires around the dry handling lap, but it was excellent in the wet with the second best wet braking and great aquaplaning resistance. It also had a very low noise, great comfort levels and a good rolling resistance.


Read Reviews    Buy from £100.52

6th: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/67
  • Weight: 8.7kgs
  • Tread: 7.5mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking11th36.7 M35.27 M+1.43 M96.1%
Dry Handling5th52.04 s51.58 s+0.46 s99.12%
Subj. Dry Handling4th90 Points100 Points-10 Points90%
Wet Braking4th33.88 M31.58 M+2.3 M93.21%
Wet Handling8th86.58 s84.81 s+1.77 s97.96%
Subj. Wet Handling5th95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Wet Circle4th11.65 s11.5 s+0.15 s98.71%
Straight Aqua2nd78.92 Km/H80.78 Km/H-1.86 Km/H97.7%
Curved Aquaplaning2nd3.56 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.14 m/sec296.22%
Subj. Comfort1st100 Points100%
Noise7th71.6 dB70.2 dB+1.4 dB98.04%
Price10th89.39 50.12 +39.27 56.07%
Rolling Resistance11th8.72 kg / t6.76 kg / t+1.96 kg / t77.52%
Good wet braking, excellent aquaplaning resistance, good dry handling, good levels of comfort.
Average dry braking, high rolling resistance.
The Falken Ziex ZE310 combines a very high aquaplaning resistance with good wet braking and very high levels of comfort.


Read Reviews    Buy from £71.50

7th: Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/69
  • Weight: 9kgs
  • Tread: 7mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking5th36.09 M35.27 M+0.82 M97.73%
Dry Handling3rd51.78 s51.58 s+0.2 s99.61%
Subj. Dry Handling4th90 Points100 Points-10 Points90%
Wet Braking5th34.12 M31.58 M+2.54 M92.56%
Wet Handling7th86.47 s84.81 s+1.66 s98.08%
Subj. Wet Handling5th95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Wet Circle8th11.71 s11.5 s+0.21 s98.21%
Straight Aqua11th73.6 Km/H80.78 Km/H-7.18 Km/H91.11%
Curved Aquaplaning12th2.81 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.89 m/sec275.95%
Subj. Comfort2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Noise13th72.8 dB70.2 dB+2.6 dB96.43%
Price6th78.5 50.12 +28.38 63.85%
Rolling Resistance7th8.36 kg / t6.76 kg / t+1.6 kg / t80.86%
Short wet braking distances, very good dry handling, short dry braking, ok rolling resistance.
Low aquaplaning resistance, high external noise.
The new Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is very strong in the dry, has good wet handling and braking and reasonable rolling resistance, however it struggled in the deeper water of the aquaplaning tests and had a high external noise.


Read Reviews    Buy from £73.99

8th: Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho Ecsta HS52
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • Weight: 9kgs
  • Tread: 7.7mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking4th35.9 M35.27 M+0.63 M98.25%
Dry Handling1st51.58 s100%
Subj. Dry Handling2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Wet Braking7th34.36 M31.58 M+2.78 M91.91%
Wet Handling10th87 s84.81 s+2.19 s97.48%
Subj. Wet Handling10th90 Points100 Points-10 Points90%
Wet Circle5th11.68 s11.5 s+0.18 s98.46%
Straight Aqua4th76.18 Km/H80.78 Km/H-4.6 Km/H94.31%
Curved Aquaplaning10th3.19 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.51 m/sec286.22%
Subj. Comfort11th90 Points100 Points-10 Points90%
Noise6th71.3 dB70.2 dB+1.1 dB98.46%
Price5th71.8 50.12 +21.68 69.81%
Rolling Resistance9th8.48 kg / t6.76 kg / t+1.72 kg / t79.72%
Very good dry handling, short dry braking distances, good aquaplaning resistance, low external noise.
Average wet grip.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 was the fastest tire of the group around dry handling, though the margins were so small in the dry it didn't really affect the overall result. It was also very good in dry braking, and had great aquaplaning resistance. A very impressive tire, and it would have finished higher if it wasn't for a high rolling resistance and average wet performance.


Read Reviews    Buy from £68.75

9th: Vredestein Ultrac

Vredestein Ultrac
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/69
  • Weight: 8.2kgs
  • Tread: 6.6mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking7th36.26 M35.27 M+0.99 M97.27%
Dry Handling11th52.4 s51.58 s+0.82 s98.44%
Subj. Dry Handling7th85 Points100 Points-15 Points85%
Wet Braking9th35.29 M31.58 M+3.71 M89.49%
Wet Handling3rd84.91 s84.81 s+0.1 s99.88%
Subj. Wet Handling1st100 Points100%
Wet Circle9th11.74 s11.5 s+0.24 s97.96%
Straight Aqua1st80.78 Km/H100%
Curved Aquaplaning1st3.7 m/sec2100%
Subj. Comfort2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Noise10th72 dB70.2 dB+1.8 dB97.5%
Price8th85.59 50.12 +35.47 58.56%
Rolling Resistance12th9.02 kg / t6.76 kg / t+2.26 kg / t74.94%
Excellent wet handling, the best aquaplaning resistance on test, good dry braking.
High rolling resistance, high external noise.
One again the Vredestein Ultrac proves to be a wet specialist, having one of the fastest wet handling laps and amongst the best aquaplaning resistance. Unfortunately all that wet performance leaves the Vredestein a little behind the group both in dry and rolling resistance tests.


Read Reviews    Buy from £77.42

9th: Toyo Proxes Comfort

Toyo Proxes Comfort
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/70
  • Weight: 8.2kgs
  • Tread: 7.8mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking6th36.15 M35.27 M+0.88 M97.57%
Dry Handling9th52.28 s51.58 s+0.7 s98.66%
Subj. Dry Handling7th85 Points100 Points-15 Points85%
Wet Braking10th36.51 M31.58 M+4.93 M86.5%
Wet Handling9th86.67 s84.81 s+1.86 s97.85%
Subj. Wet Handling1st100 Points100%
Wet Circle7th11.69 s11.5 s+0.19 s98.37%
Straight Aqua9th74.33 Km/H80.78 Km/H-6.45 Km/H92.02%
Curved Aquaplaning8th3.28 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.42 m/sec288.65%
Subj. Comfort9th92 Points100 Points-8 Points92%
Noise4th70.7 dB70.2 dB+0.5 dB99.29%
Price3rd63.49 50.12 +13.37 78.94%
Rolling Resistance3rd7.69 kg / t6.76 kg / t+0.93 kg / t87.91%
Low noise, very low rolling resistance, good dry braking.
Extended wet braking, average dry and wet handling.
The Toyo Proxes Comfort was a fun tire to drive in the wet, but sadly had longer wet braking distances than expected. It excelled in the rolling resistance testing, and was good in the dry.


Read Reviews    Buy from £62.82

11th: GT Radial FE2

GT-Radial FE2
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/A/70
  • Weight: 8.7kgs
  • Tread: 8mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking9th36.35 M35.27 M+1.08 M97.03%
Dry Handling6th52.16 s51.58 s+0.58 s98.89%
Subj. Dry Handling7th85 Points100 Points-15 Points85%
Wet Braking11th38.23 M31.58 M+6.65 M82.61%
Wet Handling11th87.27 s84.81 s+2.46 s97.18%
Subj. Wet Handling5th95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Wet Circle12th12.01 s11.5 s+0.51 s95.75%
Straight Aqua12th72.92 Km/H80.78 Km/H-7.86 Km/H90.27%
Curved Aquaplaning5th3.37 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.33 m/sec291.08%
Subj. Comfort2nd95 Points100 Points-5 Points95%
Noise8th71.8 dB70.2 dB+1.6 dB97.77%
Price4th71.15 50.12 +21.03 70.44%
Rolling Resistance6th8.34 kg / t6.76 kg / t+1.58 kg / t81.06%
Good wet and dry handling with nice subjective balance, low rolling resistance.
Extended wet braking distance, average aquaplaning resistance.
The Gt Radial FE2 in eleventh was another step on from the Nankang. Once again GT have made a tire that's enjoyable to drive, has good rolling resistance and good levels of comfort, and while it was only a few percent off in dry and wet handling, it did lose out a little in wet braking. But it was still 8 meters better than the budget.

Read Reviews    Buy from £71.26

12th: Nankang Econex NA1

Nankang Econex NA1
  • 205/55 R16 94V
  • EU Label: C/B/70
  • Weight: 9.2kgs
  • Tread: 6.9mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking12th38.45 M35.27 M+3.18 M91.73%
Dry Handling7th52.23 s51.58 s+0.65 s98.76%
Subj. Dry Handling12th75 Points100 Points-25 Points75%
Wet Braking12th39.61 M31.58 M+8.03 M79.73%
Wet Handling12th89.36 s84.81 s+4.55 s94.91%
Subj. Wet Handling12th70 Points100 Points-30 Points70%
Wet Circle10th11.88 s11.5 s+0.38 s96.8%
Straight Aqua10th74.13 Km/H80.78 Km/H-6.65 Km/H91.77%
Curved Aquaplaning9th3.25 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-0.45 m/sec287.84%
Subj. Comfort11th90 Points100 Points-10 Points90%
Noise9th71.9 dB70.2 dB+1.7 dB97.64%
Price2nd58.29 50.12 +8.17 85.98%
Rolling Resistance13th9.18 kg / t6.76 kg / t+2.42 kg / t73.64%
Fun tire to drive, reasonable grip during dry handling.
Low wet grip overall, long wet and dry braking distance, oversteer balance in the dry and wet which is not ideal for the road, poor aquaplaning resistance, high rolling resistance.
The Nankang Econex NA1 was next up, considerably better than the Doublecoin but perhaps not a tire that could be classified as great as it had long braking distances in the dry and wet, poor aquaplaning resistance, high noise and a high rolling resistance. It would however make a fun 16" dry weather track tire if you don't want to fit a semi slick.

Read Reviews    Buy from £69.88

13th: Double Coin DC99

Double-Coin DC99
  • 205/55 R16 91V
  • EU Label: C/C/70
  • Weight: 8.9kgs
  • Tread: 7mm
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking13th39.62 M35.27 M+4.35 M89.02%
Dry Handling13th53.39 s51.58 s+1.81 s96.61%
Subj. Dry Handling13th30 Points100 Points-70 Points30%
Wet Braking13th46.04 M31.58 M+14.46 M68.59%
Wet Handling13th96.27 s84.81 s+11.46 s88.1%
Subj. Wet Handling13th50 Points100 Points-50 Points50%
Wet Circle13th12.84 s11.5 s+1.34 s89.56%
Straight Aqua13th64.55 Km/H80.78 Km/H-16.23 Km/H79.91%
Curved Aquaplaning13th2.28 m/sec23.7 m/sec2-1.42 m/sec261.62%
Subj. Comfort11th90 Points100 Points-10 Points90%
Noise1st70.2 dB100%
Price1st50.12 100%
Rolling Resistance10th8.63 kg / t6.76 kg / t+1.87 kg / t78.33%
Low external noise.
Dangerously low levels of grip in the wet with extremely long wet braking distances, worst aquaplaning resistance, very low grip in the dry with poor balance, high rolling resistance.
In last place by a landslide was the Doublecoin DC99. If you want a tire that is extremely quiet for the people you drive past, this is the tire for you. For anything else, this is not the tire as it lost every other category we tested it in, most noticeably taking 14 meters longer to stop the car from just 80kph in the wet. That means when you were stopped on the Continental, you were still doing 45kmh on the Doublecoin. Go run into a tree at 45kmh and tell me that's worth saving a bit of money on your tires.

Read Reviews

comments powered by Disqus