2024 All Season and Winter Tire Test

Auto Zeitung, a German automotive publication, has conducted a tire test comparing the performance of all-season and winter tires. The test features 10 premium touring tires in size 215/55 R17, including three all-season and seven winter options, across various driving conditions.

The test results highlight the difference differences between all-season and winter tires. In dry conditions, all-season tires consistently outperformed their winter counterparts, demonstrating shorter braking distances and faster handling times. This showcases their versatility in warmer weather.

The gap between all-season and winter tires narrowed in wet conditions. While some all-season tires still excelled, certain winter tires, notably the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, showed impressive wet performance, sometimes surpassing their all-season rivals.

As expected, winter tires generally dominated in snowy conditions. However, the test revealed that some high-quality all-season tires could compete effectively with winter tires in light to moderate snow, particularly in traction and lateral grip tests.

Winter tires seemed to have a slight edge in noise reduction, while results were mixed for rolling resistance, with both tire types represented at the top and bottom of the rankings.

The test underscores the improving capabilities of all-season tires, which are increasingly able to provide solid performance across a range of conditions. However, it also reaffirms the specialized advantages of winter tires in colder, snowier environments. For drivers in moderate climates with occasional snow, a high-quality all-season tire might suffice, while those facing frequent harsh winter conditions would still benefit from dedicated winter tires.

Dry BrakingBridgestone Turanza All Season 6: 38.3 MMichelin Alpin 6: 44.9 M
Dry HandlingGoodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3: 71.9 sVredestein Wintrac Pro: 74.5 s
Wet BrakingBridgestone Turanza All Season 6: 48.9 MHankook Winter I cept RS3: 53.7 M
Wet HandlingBridgestone Blizzak LM005: 86.5 sMichelin Alpin 6: 88.9 s
Wet CircleBridgestone Blizzak LM005: 12.18 sMichelin Alpin 6: 12.69 s
Straight AquaHankook Winter I cept RS3: 82.2 Km/HVredestein Wintrac Pro: 75.8 Km/H
Snow BrakingVredestein Wintrac Pro: 21.7 MGoodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3: 22.2 M
Snow TractionGoodyear UltraGrip Performance 3: 3259 NBridgestone Turanza All Season 6: 3119 N
Snow HandlingVredestein Wintrac Pro: 65.7 sGoodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3: 68.5 s
Snow CircleGoodyear UltraGrip Performance 3: 4.65 ms/2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6: 4.54 ms/2
NoiseGoodyear UltraGrip Performance 3: 72.2 dBBridgestone Turanza All Season 6: 73.8 dB
PriceHankook Winter I cept RS3: 585 Michelin Alpin 6: 915
Rolling ResistanceContinental AllSeasonContact 2: 6.58 kg / tBridgestone Turanza All Season 6: 8.45 kg / t

Dry

The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, an all-season tire, outperformed all others with a braking distance of 38.3 meters. In contrast, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 and Michelin Alpin 6, both winter tires, had the longest braking distance at 44.9 meters. This represents a significant difference of 6.6 meters or about 17% longer braking distance. Notably, all three top performers in this test were all-season tires, demonstrating their superior dry performance compared to winter tires.

The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, another all-season tire, achieved the fastest lap time of 71.9 seconds. The Vredestein Wintrac Pro, a winter tire, was the slowest with a time of 74.5 seconds, a difference of 2.6 seconds or about 3.6%. Again, all-season tires dominated the top spots, with the best winter tire (Continental WinterContact TS 870 P) placing fourth. 

Wet

In wet conditions, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 maintained its strong performance, stopping in 48.9 meters. The Hankook Winter I cept RS3, which also struggled in dry braking, had the longest wet braking distance at 53.7 meters, a difference of 4.8 meters or about 9.8%. Interestingly, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, a winter tire, came in a close second, showcasing that some winter tires can match all season tires in wet conditions.

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 excelled in wet handling with a lap time of 86.5 seconds, while the Michelin Alpin 6 was the slowest at 88.9 seconds, a difference of 2.4 seconds or about 2.8%. The best all-season tire, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, came in second, demonstrating that both winter and all-season tires can perform well in wet conditions.

Continuing its strong wet performance, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had the fastest wet circle time of 12.18 seconds. The Michelin Alpin 6, which also struggled in wet handling, had the slowest time at 12.69 seconds, a difference of 0.51 seconds or about 4.2%. The best all-season tire, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, was again second, further highlighting the competitiveness of all-season tires in wet conditions.

The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 showed impressive aquaplaning resistance with a float speed of 82.2 km/h, while the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had the lowest float speed at 75.8 km/h, a difference of 6.4 km/h or about 8.4%. The best all-season tire, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, placed third, indicating that some winter tires have an advantage in extreme wet conditions.

Snow

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro demonstrated excellent snow braking, stopping in 21.7 meters. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, an all-season tire, had the longest braking distance at 22.2 meters, a difference of 0.5 meters or about 2.3%. This small difference suggests that some all-season tires can approach the snow performance of winter tires.

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3, a winter tire, provided the best snow traction with 3259 N of pulling force. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had the lowest traction at 3119 N, a difference of 140 N or about 4.5%. The best all-season tire, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, ranked third, again showing competitive performance in snowy conditions.

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro excelled in snow handling with a lap time of 65.7 seconds. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was the slowest at 68.5 seconds, a difference of 2.8 seconds or about 4.3%. This test clearly favored winter tires, with all-season tires occupying the bottom three positions.

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 demonstrated the best lateral snow grip at 4.65 m/s². The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had the lowest grip at 4.54 m/s², a difference of 0.11 m/s² or about 2.4%. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was the best-performing all-season tire, ranking second overall and showing that some all-season tires can compete with winter tires in snowy conditions.

Comfort

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, both winter tires, were the quietest at 72.2 dB. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was the loudest at 73.8 dB, a difference of 1.6 dB or about 2.2%. The quietest all-season tire was the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 at 72.5 dB, suggesting that winter tires may have a slight advantage in noise reduction.

Value

The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had the lowest rolling resistance at 6.58 kg/t, while the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had the highest at 8.45 kg/t, a difference of 1.87 kg/t or about 28.4%. Interestingly, all-season tires occupied both the top and bottom positions, with the best winter tire (Continental WinterContact TS 870 P) ranking third overall.

Results

1st: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
  • 215/55 R17 98V
  • EU Label: C/A/71
  • Weight: 9.7kgs
  • Tread: 8.5mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking8th44.8 M38.3 M+6.5 M85.49%
Dry Handling7th73.8 s71.9 s+1.9 s97.43%
Wet Braking2nd49 M48.9 M+0.1 M99.8%
Wet Handling1st86.5 s100%
Wet Circle1st12.18 s100%
Straight Aqua7th77.1 Km/H82.2 Km/H-5.1 Km/H93.8%
Snow Braking2nd21.9 M21.7 M+0.2 M99.09%
Snow Traction7th3186 N3259 N-73 N97.76%
Snow Handling6th66.5 s65.7 s+0.8 s98.8%
Snow Circle5th4.59 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.06 ms/298.71%
Noise1st72.2 dB100%
Price7th750 585 +165 78%
Rolling Resistance5th7.6 kg / t6.58 kg / t+1.02 kg / t86.58%
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 excels in wet conditions with the shortest braking distance and responsive handling, while maintaining stability. It's easy to control even when pushed to its limits. On snow, it provides good traction and a balanced performance, although the steering feedback could be clearer. In dry conditions, it prioritizes comfort, providing the smoothest ride among the winter tires tested. However, it does have a slightly longer braking distance. It handles corners effectively but is not the most eager to turn. Overall, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 emerges as the top performer among winter tires, thanks to its exceptional wet grip. However, it delivers an average performance on dry surfaces.

Read Reviews    Buy from £156.42

1st: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Continental AllSeasonContact 2
  • 215/55 R17 98W
  • EU Label: B/B/72
  • Weight: 8.9kgs
  • Tread: 7.5mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking2nd40.4 M38.3 M+2.1 M94.8%
Dry Handling3rd72.8 s71.9 s+0.9 s98.76%
Wet Braking3rd49.8 M48.9 M+0.9 M98.19%
Wet Handling4th86.9 s86.5 s+0.4 s99.54%
Wet Circle3rd12.33 s12.18 s+0.15 s98.78%
Straight Aqua8th76.5 Km/H82.2 Km/H-5.7 Km/H93.07%
Snow Braking9th22.1 M21.7 M+0.4 M98.19%
Snow Traction4th3226 N3259 N-33 N98.99%
Snow Handling9th68.4 s65.7 s+2.7 s96.05%
Snow Circle2nd4.62 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.03 ms/299.35%
Noise3rd72.5 dB72.2 dB+0.3 dB99.59%
Price5th725 585 +140 80.69%
Rolling Resistance1st6.58 kg / t100%
The Continental AllseasonContact 2 is the most fuel-efficient among all tires and the fastest in the slalom test in dry conditions. It provides good cornering support and stability while remaining agile. In wet conditions, it matches the score of the Continental winter tire. It requires a bit more driver effort to achieve its full performance potential at the limit. On snow, it delivers a surprising performance by achieving slightly better results than the Continental WinterContact TS 870P. The Continental AllseasonContact 2 sets a new benchmark for all-season tires by providing more grip on snow than the Continental winter tire.

Read Reviews    Buy from £152.65

1st: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
  • 215/55 R17 98W
  • EU Label: A/B/71
  • Weight: 9.1kgs
  • Tread: 7.5mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd41.8 M38.3 M+3.5 M91.63%
Dry Handling1st71.9 s100%
Wet Braking6th51.9 M48.9 M+3 M94.22%
Wet Handling2nd86.6 s86.5 s+0.1 s99.88%
Wet Circle2nd12.21 s12.18 s+0.03 s99.75%
Straight Aqua8th76.5 Km/H82.2 Km/H-5.7 Km/H93.07%
Snow Braking10th22.2 M21.7 M+0.5 M97.75%
Snow Traction3rd3230 N3259 N-29 N99.11%
Snow Handling10th68.5 s65.7 s+2.8 s95.91%
Snow Circle7th4.57 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.08 ms/298.28%
Noise4th72.7 dB72.2 dB+0.5 dB99.31%
Price4th720 585 +135 81.25%
Rolling Resistance2nd7.1 kg / t6.58 kg / t+0.52 kg / t92.68%
The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 achieves the fastest lap time in dry conditions, thanks to its high grip levels and excellent handling. It delivers strong results across the board. In wet conditions, it demonstrates high grip levels, balanced performance, and clear transitions at its limits. However, its braking performance in wet conditions is only average. On snow, it surpasses some winter tires, excelling in grip, feedback, and balanced handling. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 once again proves its exceptional capabilities, securing the top position among all-season tires with a well-balanced performance.

Read Reviews    Buy from £144.24

2nd: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
  • 215/55 R17 98V
  • EU Label: C/C/71
  • Weight: 8.9kgs
  • Tread: 8.35mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking5th43.3 M38.3 M+5 M88.45%
Dry Handling6th73.4 s71.9 s+1.5 s97.96%
Wet Braking7th52.5 M48.9 M+3.6 M93.14%
Wet Handling7th87.6 s86.5 s+1.1 s98.74%
Wet Circle8th12.5 s12.18 s+0.32 s97.44%
Straight Aqua2nd79.4 Km/H82.2 Km/H-2.8 Km/H96.59%
Snow Braking2nd21.9 M21.7 M+0.2 M99.09%
Snow Traction1st3259 N100%
Snow Handling5th66.4 s65.7 s+0.7 s98.95%
Snow Circle1st4.65 ms/2100%
Noise1st72.2 dB100%
Price7th750 585 +165 78%
Rolling Resistance4th7.44 kg / t6.58 kg / t+0.86 kg / t88.44%
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 offers strong braking, good comfort, and efficient rolling in dry conditions. It maintains stability in corners but can be a bit slow to respond to steering changes. In wet conditions, it demonstrates stability and a tendency to understeer, making it predictable but slightly less agile. On snow, it performs nearly on par with the Pirelli, providing slightly better traction and lateral grip. The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 secures a strong position with its excellent snow grip and an overall well-balanced performance without any significant weaknesses.

Read Reviews

3rd: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
  • 215/55 R17 98W
  • EU Label: C/B/70
  • Weight: 9.6kgs
  • Tread: 7.35mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking1st38.3 M100%
Dry Handling2nd72.5 s71.9 s+0.6 s99.17%
Wet Braking1st48.9 M100%
Wet Handling6th87.3 s86.5 s+0.8 s99.08%
Wet Circle7th12.48 s12.18 s+0.3 s97.6%
Straight Aqua3rd79.3 Km/H82.2 Km/H-2.9 Km/H96.47%
Snow Braking2nd21.9 M21.7 M+0.2 M99.09%
Snow Traction10th3119 N3259 N-140 N95.7%
Snow Handling8th68.2 s65.7 s+2.5 s96.33%
Snow Circle10th4.54 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.11 ms/297.63%
Noise10th73.8 dB72.2 dB+1.6 dB97.83%
Price3rd650 585 +65 90%
Rolling Resistance10th8.45 kg / t6.58 kg / t+1.87 kg / t77.87%
The Bridgestone Turanza Allseason 6 outperforms the competition with the shortest braking distance in dry conditions. However, it has the highest rolling resistance. It offers a smooth ride but is a bit louder. In wet conditions, it demonstrates slightly less grip than its winter counterpart when cornering, but compensates with the shortest braking distance among all tires tested. Although it scores the fewest points on snow among the all-season tires, it still provides sufficient grip for winter conditions. The Bridgestone Turanza Allseason 6 is a strong all-around performer with good snow performance despite being the weakest in its category. However, it does have high rolling resistance.

Read Reviews    Buy from £152.34

3rd: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
  • 215/55 R17 98V
  • EU Label: B/B/71
  • Weight: 9.1kgs
  • Tread: 8.2mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking4th43.2 M38.3 M+4.9 M88.66%
Dry Handling4th73 s71.9 s+1.1 s98.49%
Wet Braking4th51.2 M48.9 M+2.3 M95.51%
Wet Handling5th87 s86.5 s+0.5 s99.43%
Wet Circle5th12.46 s12.18 s+0.28 s97.75%
Straight Aqua5th78.3 Km/H82.2 Km/H-3.9 Km/H95.26%
Snow Braking8th22 M21.7 M+0.3 M98.64%
Snow Traction8th3159 N3259 N-100 N96.93%
Snow Handling7th67.9 s65.7 s+2.2 s96.76%
Snow Circle7th4.57 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.08 ms/298.28%
Noise5th72.8 dB72.2 dB+0.6 dB99.18%
Price9th785 585 +200 74.52%
Rolling Resistance3rd7.26 kg / t6.58 kg / t+0.68 kg / t90.63%
The Continental WinterContact TS 870P boasts the lowest rolling resistance and shortest braking distance among the winter tires in dry conditions. It offers good comfort and handles corners with stability. In wet conditions, it is the second-best winter tire, providing smooth handling, balanced performance, and the ability to maintain control even under braking and steering simultaneously. Surprisingly, it exhibits a weaker performance in snow, with lower-than-expected lateral grip and limited self-stabilizing capabilities when it starts to slide. Despite its weaker snow performance, the Continental WinterContact TS 870P delivers a strong overall performance.

Read Reviews    Buy from £169.99

4th: Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
  • 215/55 R17 98V
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • Weight: 9.8kgs
  • Tread: 8.8mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking6th44 M38.3 M+5.7 M87.05%
Dry Handling9th74.4 s71.9 s+2.5 s96.64%
Wet Braking8th53 M48.9 M+4.1 M92.26%
Wet Handling3rd86.8 s86.5 s+0.3 s99.65%
Wet Circle4th12.39 s12.18 s+0.21 s98.31%
Straight Aqua4th78.7 Km/H82.2 Km/H-3.5 Km/H95.74%
Snow Braking2nd21.9 M21.7 M+0.2 M99.09%
Snow Traction2nd3257 N3259 N-2 N99.94%
Snow Handling2nd66.2 s65.7 s+0.5 s99.24%
Snow Circle2nd4.62 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.03 ms/299.35%
Noise7th73.3 dB72.2 dB+1.1 dB98.5%
Price6th735 585 +150 79.59%
Rolling Resistance8th8.28 kg / t6.58 kg / t+1.7 kg / t79.47%
The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 displays lively handling and responsive feedback in dry conditions, but it's not as balanced as on wet surfaces. It has commendably low noise levels inside the cabin. In wet conditions, it has longer braking distances but exhibits a balanced and responsive handling in corners. On snow, it leads the winter tire rankings, providing excellent grip and clear feedback. The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 is a good choice for snowy conditions, but its long wet braking distances and average dry performance hinder a higher overall ranking.

Read Reviews    Buy from £153.78

5th: Hankook Winter I cept RS3

Hankook Winter I cept RS3
  • 215/55 R17 98V
  • EU Label: C/B/72
  • Weight: 9.6kgs
  • Tread: 7.85mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking9th44.9 M38.3 M+6.6 M85.3%
Dry Handling4th73 s71.9 s+1.1 s98.49%
Wet Braking10th53.7 M48.9 M+4.8 M91.06%
Wet Handling9th88.5 s86.5 s+2 s97.74%
Wet Circle9th12.59 s12.18 s+0.41 s96.74%
Straight Aqua1st82.2 Km/H100%
Snow Braking2nd21.9 M21.7 M+0.2 M99.09%
Snow Traction9th3141 N3259 N-118 N96.38%
Snow Handling3rd66.3 s65.7 s+0.6 s99.1%
Snow Circle9th4.56 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.09 ms/298.06%
Noise6th72.9 dB72.2 dB+0.7 dB99.04%
Price1st585 100%
Rolling Resistance9th8.31 kg / t6.58 kg / t+1.73 kg / t79.18%
The Hankook Winter icept RS3 W462 has a firm ride on uneven roads in dry conditions. Its rolling resistance and braking performance are acceptable but are not the best in this test. While offering excellent protection against aquaplaning in wet conditions, it has the longest braking distance. It requires larger steering inputs when cornering. On snow, it delivers a decent performance, with good grip but less clear feedback near its grip limits. Although the Hankook Winter icept RS3 W462 performs well on snow, its long braking distances on wet and dry surfaces prevent it from ranking higher.

Read Reviews

6th: Michelin Alpin 6

Michelin Alpin 6
  • 215/55 R17 98V
  • EU Label: C/B/69
  • Weight: 9.2kgs
  • Tread: 7.8mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking9th44.9 M38.3 M+6.6 M85.3%
Dry Handling8th74.2 s71.9 s+2.3 s96.9%
Wet Braking5th51.5 M48.9 M+2.6 M94.95%
Wet Handling10th88.9 s86.5 s+2.4 s97.3%
Wet Circle10th12.69 s12.18 s+0.51 s95.98%
Straight Aqua6th78.1 Km/H82.2 Km/H-4.1 Km/H95.01%
Snow Braking2nd21.9 M21.7 M+0.2 M99.09%
Snow Traction5th3217 N3259 N-42 N98.71%
Snow Handling3rd66.3 s65.7 s+0.6 s99.1%
Snow Circle5th4.59 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.06 ms/298.71%
Noise9th73.5 dB72.2 dB+1.3 dB98.23%
Price10th915 585 +330 63.93%
Rolling Resistance7th8.14 kg / t6.58 kg / t+1.56 kg / t80.84%
The Michelin Alpin 6 exhibits pronounced understeer in dry conditions, limiting its sporty handling. Its braking distance is acceptable but on the longer side. It does offer a smooth ride over bumps. In wet conditions, it provides smooth transitions at its grip limits, but it tends to push wide in corners earlier than its competitors. On snow, it achieves a good rating, handling well but requiring larger steering inputs to maximize cornering grip. The Michelin Alpin 6's strong snow performance is overshadowed by its weaker performance on dry surfaces.

Read Reviews

7th: Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Vredestein Wintrac Pro
  • 215/55 R17 98V
  • EU Label: C/B/72
  • Weight: 9.5kgs
  • Tread: 8.2mm
  • 3PMSF: yes
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking7th44.4 M38.3 M+6.1 M86.26%
Dry Handling10th74.5 s71.9 s+2.6 s96.51%
Wet Braking9th53.3 M48.9 M+4.4 M91.74%
Wet Handling8th88.3 s86.5 s+1.8 s97.96%
Wet Circle6th12.47 s12.18 s+0.29 s97.67%
Straight Aqua10th75.8 Km/H82.2 Km/H-6.4 Km/H92.21%
Snow Braking1st21.7 M100%
Snow Traction6th3211 N3259 N-48 N98.53%
Snow Handling1st65.7 s100%
Snow Circle4th4.61 ms/24.65 ms/2-0.04 ms/299.14%
Noise7th73.3 dB72.2 dB+1.1 dB98.5%
Price2nd620 585 +35 94.35%
Rolling Resistance6th7.92 kg / t6.58 kg / t+1.34 kg / t83.08%
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro delivers an average performance in dry conditions. It's the slowest in the slalom test but offers a comfortable ride. In wet conditions, it exhibits low precision, strong understeer, and a long braking distance, resulting in the lowest ranking for this category. On snow, it achieves the shortest braking distance. However, its handling can be sensitive to weight transfer, which may not suit all drivers. The Vredestein Wintrac Pro prioritizes snow grip but falls short in wet conditions. Its dry performance is also unremarkable.

Read Reviews


Discussion:

comments powered by Disqus