In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Continental UltraContact NXT and the Michelin e.Primacy to find out which tire is best for your own driving.
The good news is that both the Continental UltraContact NXT and Michelin e.Primacy are Premium Touring Summer tires designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tires is relatively simple.
Both tires are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tire tests.
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tires directly!
Out of these two tests:
While it might look like the Continental UltraContact NXT is better than the Michelin e.Primacy purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during one dry braking tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT stopped the vehicle in 1.35% less distance than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Dry Braking: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:36.3M | Michelin e.Primacy: 37.8M |
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Continental UltraContact NXT:36.6M | ✓ Michelin e.Primacy: 36.1M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT was 1.69% faster around a lap than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:52.5s | Michelin e.Primacy: 53.4s |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT was 0.93% faster around a lap than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:107.1Km/H | Michelin e.Primacy: 106.1Km/H |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT scored 11.27% more points than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:7.1 Points | Michelin e.Primacy: 6.3 Points |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT stopped the vehicle in 5.77% less distance than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:31.5M | Michelin e.Primacy: 35M |
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:50.2M | Michelin e.Primacy: 51.7M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT was 1.05% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:84.6s | Michelin e.Primacy: 85.5s |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT was 2.68% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:78.4Km/H | Michelin e.Primacy: 76.3Km/H |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT had 1.5% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Wet Circle: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:8.49m/s | Michelin e.Primacy: 8.39m/s |
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:0.841m/s | Michelin e.Primacy: 0.802m/s |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT floated at a 1.76% higher speed than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Straight Aqua: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
Continental UltraContact NXT:73.8Km/H | Michelin e.Primacy: 73.8Km/H |
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:74.1Km/H | Michelin e.Primacy: 71.5Km/H |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental UltraContact NXT slipped out at a 8.66% higher speed than the Michelin e.Primacy.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental UltraContact NXT
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:2.78m/sec2 | Michelin e.Primacy: 2.77m/sec2 |
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:2.75m/sec2 | Michelin e.Primacy: 2.28m/sec2 |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental UltraContact NXT and Michelin e.Primacy performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Continental UltraContact NXT:7 Points | Michelin e.Primacy: 7 Points |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during one noise tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy measured 0.3% quieter than the Continental UltraContact NXT.
Best In Noise: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
Continental UltraContact NXT:71dB | ✓ Michelin e.Primacy: 70.5dB |
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Continental UltraContact NXT:63.8dB | Michelin e.Primacy: 63.9dB |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin e.Primacy was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin e.Primacy had a 11.83% lower rolling resistance than the Continental UltraContact NXT.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin e.Primacy
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
2025 AMS Sustainability Tire Test 215/55 R17 |
Continental UltraContact NXT:6.1kg / t | ✓ Michelin e.Primacy: 5.7kg / t |
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Continental UltraContact NXT:6.58kg / t | ✓ Michelin e.Primacy: 5.48kg / t |
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Continental UltraContact NXT and Michelin e.Primacy.
In total the Continental UltraContact NXT has been reviewed 1 times and drivers have given the tire 93% overall.
The Michelin e.Primacy has been reviewed 13 times and drivers have given the tire 75% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin e.Primacy.
In conclusion the Continental UltraContact NXT performed better in dry braking, dry handling [s], dry handling [km/h], subj. dry handling, wet braking, wet handling [s], wet handling [km/h], wet circle, straight aqua and curved aquaplaning, while the Michelin e.Primacy performed better in noise and rolling resistance.
Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in subj. comfort, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Continental UltraContact NXT seems to be the best tire overall.
However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.
Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.