In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Michelin X Ice Snow and the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 to find out which tire is best for your own driving.
The good news is that both the Michelin X Ice Snow and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 are Premium Touring Winter tires designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars, which means comparing the two tires is relatively simple.
Both tires are hugely popular in the market place with drivers, and both have been featured in independent tire tests.
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tires directly!
Out of these four tests:
While it might look like the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 is better than the Michelin X Ice Snow purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 stopped the vehicle in 1.3% less distance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Dry Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:47.88M | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 47.45M |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:31.82M | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 31.12M |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:30.96M | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 30.65M |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was 0.07% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:73.01s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 72.96s |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 0.97% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:98 Points | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 100 Points |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:4 Points | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 3 Points |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow stopped the vehicle in 2.25% less distance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:35.59M | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 35.21M |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:41.98M | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 43.16M |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:38.4M | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 40.28M |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow was 0.57% faster around a wet lap than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:81.55s | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 83.2s |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:42.8s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 42.2s |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:42.1s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 42s |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 5% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:100 Points | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 95 Points |
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow floated at a 8.45% higher speed than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:80.11Km/H | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 71.46Km/H |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:65Km/H | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 61.4Km/H |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow slipped out at a 12.54% higher speed than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:63.8m/sec2 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 55.8m/sec2 |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 stopped the vehicle in 0.08% less distance than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:15.81M | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 15.51M |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:11.56M | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 11.52M |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:12.21M | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 12.52M |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 accelerated 0.82% faster than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Traction: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:5.66s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 5.55s |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:4.47s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 4.45s |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:4.57s | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 4.57s |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during three snow handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was 1.19% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:88.56s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 87.8s |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:84.04s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 83.04s |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:76.7s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 75.5s |
Best In Subj. Snow Handling:
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:95 Points | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 95 Points |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was 0.38% faster around a snow circle than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Snow Circle: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:29.09S | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 28.98S |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during two ice braking tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow stopped the vehicle 0.4% shorter than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Ice Braking: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:10.14M | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 10.18M |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:15.3M | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 15.02M |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:12.09M | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 12.49M |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during two ice traction tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 accelerated 1.03% faster than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Ice Traction: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Ice Traction winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:6.12s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 6.06s |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:7.01s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 6.68s |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:7.32s | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 7.52s |
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during two ice handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was 1.84% faster around a lap than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Ice Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Ice Handling winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:52.92s | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 53.5s |
2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:71.21s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 69.9s |
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:47.1s | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 44.7s |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one subj. ice handling tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow scored 5% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Subj. Ice Handling: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Subj. Ice Handling winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:100 Points | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 95 Points |
Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one noise tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 measured 0.27% quieter than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Noise: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:74.5dB | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 74.3dB |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one noise tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 measured 0.32% quieter than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Noise: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:62.1dB | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 61.9dB |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin X Ice Snow was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin X Ice Snow had a 1.23% lower rolling resistance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin X Ice Snow
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
2022/23 Tire Reviews Studless Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 |
✓ Michelin X Ice Snow:7.25kg / t | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 7.34kg / t |
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 used 4.85% less fuel than the Michelin X Ice Snow.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 |
Michelin X Ice Snow:5.15l/100km | ✓ Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5: 4.9l/100km |
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Michelin X Ice Snow and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
In total the Michelin X Ice Snow has been reviewed 12 times and drivers have given the tire 82% overall.
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 has been reviewed 8 times and drivers have given the tire 90% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5.
In conclusion the Michelin X Ice Snow performed better in wet braking, wet handling [s], subj. wet handling, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, ice braking, subj. ice handling and rolling resistance, while the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [s], subj. dry handling, snow braking, snow traction, snow handling [s], snow circle, ice traction, ice handling [s], noise, noise and fuel consumption.
Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in subj. snow handling, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 seems to be the best tire overall.
However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.
Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Overall Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.