Falken Azenis FK510

Name: Falken Azenis FK510
Brand: Falken
Rating: 4.1 (147 reviews)

The Falken Azenis FK510 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tire review data from 147 tire reviews averaging 81% over 1,346,938 miles driven, and 38 tests with an average result of 5th.

Dry Grip 88%

Wet Grip 88%

Road Feedback 82%

Handling 82%

Wear 72%

Comfort 77%

Buy again 82%

Add Your Photos View All

The Falken Azenis FK510 has been tested by Tire Reviews! Click here to view the in depth tire test>>

First On Market	March 2016
Wheel Size	17 - 22"
Width	205 - 305mm
Profile	25 - 55

Rolling Resistance	B - D
Wet Grip	A - A
Noise (dB)	69 - 73
Winter Rating	Not Winter Rated

The Azenis FK510 is ranked 24th of 147 Summer Ultra High Performance tires.

This tire replaced the Falken FK453 and this tire has been replaced by the Falken Azenis FK520.

In Depth Tire Comparisons

Falken Azenis FK510 VS Continental Premium Contact 6

Tests Included

Best Result

1st

Worst Result

15th

Average Result

5th

Latest Tire Test Results

2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tire Test

9th of 10 tires

Moderately dynamic summer tire with good aquaplaning reserves, good comfort.
Weak grip and long braking in the wet, oversteer balance.

View Full Test >>

2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tire Test

3rd of 11 tires

Good performance potential, excellent aquaplaning resistance, stable handling the wet, sporty dry dynamics.
High price level.

View Full Test >>

2022 AMS Performance Summer Tire Test

8th of 10 tires

Acceptable wet braking performance, good grip in the wet and dry.
Limited aquapaning resistance, poor balance in the dry, limited sportiness.
Well priced and essentially safe in the wet.

View Full Test >>

Size	Fuel	Wet	Noise

View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Falken Azenis FK510 >>

Questions and Answers for the Falken Azenis FK510

Ask a question

September 19, 2018

Please can you tell me if it is safe to have an FK453 on nearside rear and FK510 on offside rear, on a Ford Mondeo Estate?

It is always recommended to change tires in axle pairs, so mixing them isn't advised. There would be nothing inherently unsafe, but it could cause vehicle balance issues, especially in the wet.

November 2, 2018

Putting these Falkens on a 2007 911, are these tire able to be rotated from right to left?

The Falken FK510 is an asymmetric tire so yes you can rotate it left to right.

June 8, 2019

Are Falken tires (FK510) suitable for a Porsche Boxster S?

Assuming you can find the correct size and load rating you need in the FK510, there's no reason you shouldn't use them on a Boxster.

October 21, 2019

Are falken azenis fk510 tires all season tires?

The Azenis FK510 is a summer tire.

November 4, 2019

Hi, I have Mazda 6 2.5 2008. I ride mostly 90% city + 10% curved countryside roads (I like enjoy them). The best solution is buy Michelin Pilot Sport 4, I know, but it is 50-60% more expensive then FK510. I decide between FK510 and Goodyear F1 Asym 5. Question is - Should I pay 15 % more for Goodyear or there isn't too much better behavior for that higher price?

Have a watch of our big tire test on YouTube, it should answer your question. In short, if you like handling, then the Asym5 is worth the extra.

April 5, 2021

I have a suv 4x4 with Bridgestone Dueler on front and rear axles. The rears have worn to 3.4mm in 15000 miles the fronts are on 5mm. I tow a caravan. Would Falken FK510 tires be any better?

There is almost no wear testing for highly loaded tires for reference, however the Bridgestone Dueler range of tires have traditionally be good wearing tires so I would be surprised if the Falken gave you extra treadlife. There would likely be improvements in wet performance and comfort.

May 12, 2021

Looking to put falken fk510 on my vauxhall gtc with 19" rims, new pair onto go on the front only. However, load rating for the falkens is 99, car already has 95 load tires on the back which will stay on, and 95 is the norm for this vehicle. Will there be any difference with the 99 load on the front? Thanks

In theory the 99 load could have a slightly stiffer construction, but given they're different brand tires front and rear that will be a bigger difference than the different load ratings fitted.

November 3, 2021

Is the Falken f510 suitable for rear drive wheels of a mercedes e250cdi amg convertable

Yes it is.

November 22, 2021

Are FALKEN AZENIS FR510 18” run flats

Falken do make the FK510 in certain runflat sizes.

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

Size	Price Range
215/45 R17	$151.00 - $151.00 (1 Prices)	Compare Prices >>
225/40 R18	$180.00 - $180.00 (1 Prices)	Compare Prices >>
225/45 R17	$161.00 - $161.00 (1 Prices)	Compare Prices >>
255/35 R19	$211.00 - $211.00 (1 Prices)	Compare Prices >>
Available in 76 tire sizes - View all.

YouTube Review

Top 3 Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews

Given 100% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles

Better than Pirelli

Helpful 760 - tire reviewed on July 6, 2016

Given 81% while driving a Ford S Max (225/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 0 miles

I have been driving 225/50 17 98 XL FR tire for three years. Amazing wet grip, maybe not so amazing in the last season - the tire became hard...

Helpful 315 - tire reviewed on April 1, 2020

Given 91% while driving a Volvo XC60 (255/50 R19) on mostly country roads for 30,000 spirited miles

THE BEST TIRE I EVER HAD.
BUT TIRES MADE IN JAPAN
THE SAME TIRE MANUFACTURED IN TURKEY IS GARBAGE!

Helpful 48 - tire reviewed on April 23, 2024

Have you driven on the Falken Azenis FK510 tire?

Have YOU got experience with the Falken Azenis FK510? Help millions of other tire buyers

Review your Falken Azenis FK510 >

Latest Falken Azenis FK510 Reviews

Given 77% while driving a SEAT Leon 5F 1.0 TSI (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 35,000 spirited miles

I used the tires in Singapore where it’s hot throughout the year with the seasonal monsoon, and occasional drive up to Malaysia (300km+ one way).

Got these tires because of the good pricing with good reviews and it did not disappoint. The dry grip and handling is really good, can really feel the car sticking to the roads especially when taking corners at higher speeds. However, for wet weather grip, it is just slightly less grippy, but still does well with the handling.

Road feedback wise is average but better than my previous tires. Did around 50k km with the tires and was overall really satisfied. After a year of usage then I started to feel the grip losing out a little.

Would recommend the FK510 over FK520 as the grip feels better and I feel more confident taking corners on the FK510. Additional bonus is that it is one of the more affordable set of good tires.

Helpful 2 - tire reviewed on March 7, 2025

Given 63% while driving a Lexus IS350 (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 19,457 average miles

Pretty average, nothing special, staggered fitment front tires on my Lexus IS350, they replaced the Japanese Bridgestones that were on the car when I bought it (it's a Japanese import car) -- NZ roads are pretty hard on tires, and very noisy roads, since most here are chip-seal, the tires didn't really seem that amazing from a handling perspective but I don't drive super hard-out so who knows if they're great, the FK510s wore out after 31,314kms... replaced by some Nexen Nfera AU5 so we'll see how those go when they wear out.

Helpful 4 - tire reviewed on February 25, 2025

Look after your tires, check out our favourite tire inflation tools!

Given 87% while driving a Mercedes Benz C200 w205 (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles

I have fk510 on a c200 2020
The dry grip is good but in the wet the grip is super solid, in difficult rainy conditions i really felt safe with it.
We have another car with the Goodyear oem original mercedes ones ( c200 2021) and the driving experience is the same although the GY ones are more expensive
Maybe the only negative thing is that I don't think they're helping the mileage since they're very grippy.
Highly recommened

Helpful 9 - tire reviewed on February 9, 2025

Given 77% while driving a BMW 520i (245/40 R19) on mostly town for 25,000 spirited miles

Using this tire for my BMW 520 for almost 2 years with around 26k KM. Road noise is acceptable. Love the grip in dry. It give you confidence to take corner.

Helpful 29 - tire reviewed on June 6, 2024

Given 56% while driving a Hyundai Coupe 2.0L (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10 spirited miles

Do not buy this tire or ANY hard compound tire if you drive a Hyundai Coupe, especially a TSIII with factory lowered suspension, you will feel every single imperfection in the road and the ride comfort is absolutely abysmal. This car cannot handle hard compound tires, fit a soft compound like Bridgestone Turanza.

Helpful 41 - tire reviewed on January 29, 2024

Given 81% while driving a BMW 320D xDrive Gran Turismo (225/45 R19) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles

Good tires, maybe little too soft but overall very good. Good and stable in the rain.

Helpful 56 - tire reviewed on December 8, 2023

Given 96% while driving a Mercedes Benz C220 cdi (255/35 R19) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles

I’ve driven Pirelli Cinturato P7 and Goodyear aswell on Mercedes C class and I can say that Pirelli is the worst especially in the wet. Comparing Goodyear and Falken they are both worth the money, the only difference is the wear where Falken is not that good. But since Goodyear and other high end price tires can be double of Falken price, I would definetely recommend Falken.

Helpful 58 - tire reviewed on October 24, 2023

Given 64% while driving a Citroën C5 (245/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 22,000 spirited miles

The tires were fitted to the car since I bought it (used). They were 1.5 years old when I bought the car, with 15000 km (8000 miles) fitted beginning of 2020. I have done 20k km with the car since, so tires changed at 35k km.
From 15-20000 km they were performing really good, dry and wet conditions. At around 20k I had swapped front and back ones as wear was pretty high at the front, and from 20-25k wet grip was fading. I had also experienced balancing issues (around 120+ km a mild rattling of the steering wheel).
I would say that for the first 20k it's a really high performance tire, as grip was amasing, dry and wet, but as it wears out it starts becoming more and more slippery. At the end of their life they were kind of dangerous in the wet, and 35k kilometers (~28k miles) it's not that high for the price of 18 inch tires (rears were at the same level as the legal limit indicators). I have gone to something completely different (higher profile 17 inches to try how my hydractive suspension behaves) so I cannot give a direct comparison, obviously the new tires are grippier than the almost slick falkens :p

Helpful 58 - tire reviewed on August 21, 2023

Given 73% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI 7.5 (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles

Just had these fitted on my 300HP tuned MK7.5 Golf GTI. So this review will be initial impressions after a few hundred KM of city and highway driving. I will not be able to comment on the tire wear right now. I will be comparing the FK510 to the Bridgestone RE004 that I was using prior.

Dry grip is good. Very close to the RE004. Definitely more than adequate for daily driving. Even when cornering at speed, the tires grip well and don’t squeal much. Wet grip is slightly better than the RE004. The RE004 felt a bit nervous when driving quickly on wet roads. But on the FK510, there is less aquaplaning and the car feels more planted.

Feel wise, the RE004 is noticeably stiffer than the FK510. As a result, the FK510 just doesn’t feel as sharp or darty through corners. A nice handling tire but just not sharp enough to compete with the best in this mid-range UHP segment. However the FK510 is more comfortable and absorbs bumps better.

Overall, a good UHP tire for daily driving but definitely not the best in the segment in terms of handling. I wouldn’t buy these again as I prioritise driving enjoyment over all else but for someone who wants a jack-of-all-trades tire for their daily driver. The FK510 is a good choice.

Helpful 52 - tire reviewed on August 7, 2023

Given 78% while driving a Subaru BRZ (245/40 R17) on mostly motorways for 2,000 average miles

I bought these after about a month of searching for 245 wide tires that won't explose my budget, since I wanted some more meat under my BRZ. The sidewall feels softer than my previous set, but it's probably only due to the increased size (going from 215 on a 7in to a 245 on a 9in). Overall the tire has great grip, wether its cold, warm or wet. Tried a single session on them at a local racetrack, and they held very well! No understeer or oversteer even after pushing. I do have a slightly aggressive alignment, which may help. Overall its a great tire for a fun daily driver, maybe not as good as the top dogs in the UHP category, hopefully after some more miles they still shine.

Helpful 51 - tire reviewed on June 11, 2023

Given 67% while driving a Volkswagen Passat B7 (235/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 20,000 spirited miles

Bare in mind before you read this review, I had these tires on a 170 HP VW, so I might not have the most fair review... but man these tires rock. I can never break traction in the dry, and almost never do in the wet. Only complaint is they don't last at all.

Helpful 56 - tire reviewed on May 5, 2023

Given 87% while driving a Alfa Romeo 159 (225/50 R17) on mostly motorways for 30,000 easy going miles

I had these tires on my previous car (2011 Alfa Romeo 159 SW 2.0 JTDm). I sold it about 1 month ago. As it is still fresh in my memory, a wrote this review. The Falken Azenis FK510 is fantastic! Maybe not the best for rolling resistance so fuel economy, but not bad either. If my new car (2018 Mazda 6 SW 2.0 Skyactiv-G 165) needs new tires, chances are it will be Falken. Maybe I will try the new FK520 then.