Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

Tire review data from 16 tire reviews averaging 81% over 347,656 miles driven, and 4 tests with an average result of 5th.

Dry Grip 86%
Wet Grip 86%
Road Feedback 78%
Handling 77%
Wear 75%
Comfort 79%
Buy again 82%

First On MarketMay 2021
Wheel Size17 - 22"
Width215 - 315mm
Profile30 - 65
Rolling ResistanceB - D
Wet GripA - C
Noise (dB)67 - 75
Winter RatingNot Winter Rated

The Ventus S1 evo2 SUV is ranked 10th of 28 Summer Ultra High Performance tires.

Tests Included

4

Best Result

2nd

Worst Result

7th

Average Result

5th

Latest Tire Test Results

2019 Auto Express SUV Tire Test
6th of 8 tires
  • Low noise and good in the wet, the dry grip could do with improving.
View Full Test >>
2017 Summer SUV Tire Test
3rd of 5 tires
  • A very well balanced all round tire, highest resistance to aquaplaning, excellent grip and behaviour in the dry and wet, low fuel consumption, most comfortable tire on test. Only lost out to two more expensive tires
  • None mentioned
View Full Test >>
2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tire Test
2nd of 10 tires
  • The best resistance to aquaplaning, high braking performance, high grip on wet surfaces, good results on dry roads
  • Average comfort, high rolling resistance
View Full Test >>

2019 Tire Tests

2017 Tire Tests

2016 Tire Tests

SizeFuelWetNoise
17 inch
235/65R17 104 VBB70
235/65R17 108 V XLBC70
235/65R17 104 WCC70
18 inch
235/60R18 103 WCB69
235/60R18 103 WCA72
235/60R18 103 WDA71
235/60R18 103 VBB70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV >>

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV

2018-12-02 - I drive a Porsche Macan S 2016. I am looking for summer tire in 19". I found a document from Porsche recommending the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2. But they do not specify the SUV model. Which model should I actually get ? Do I need the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo SUV or the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo will do ?

As long as the tire meets the correct size and load rating, you can use either. On a sporty SUV like the Mecan I imagine both will be suitable.

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Size Price Range  
235/60 R18 $263.99 - $263.99 (1 Prices) Compare Prices >>
245/45 R19 $157.99 - $157.99 (1 Prices) Compare Prices >>
275/45 R20 $309.99 - $309.99 (1 Prices) Compare Prices >>
Available in 15 tire sizes - View all.

Top 3 Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Reviews

Given 96% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan SE Nav 2.0 TDI 150PS 2WD 6spd Man (235/50 R19) on mostly country roads for 34,500 easy going miles
Just changed front two tires on 2019 Tiguan. 34500 miles covered. Rear tires still only half worn.
Helpful 28 - tire reviewed on March 1, 2023
Given 87% while driving a Volkswagen (B8) 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) DSG ACT (235/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 40,000 spirited miles
Amazing tires. Great in both wet and dry conditions. Handles well with superb roadfeedback. Also comfortable at the same time. No other words than to say hankook has nailed it with this model.
Helpful 30 - tire reviewed on December 25, 2022
Given 83% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan (215/65 R17) on for 80,000 miles
I have driven 80,000 km, road holding is very good. I think it could have been quieter in terms of noise.
Helpful 7 - tire reviewed on November 12, 2024
Have you driven on the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV tire?

Have YOU got experience with the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV? Help millions of other tire buyers

Review your Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV >

Latest Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan (235/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 40,000 spirited miles
Great set of tires! They have everything you would want from your tires. Excellent comfort and excellent handling. In heavy downpours it is never phased. Very impressive and confidence inspiring tires. Would highly recommend . Can't wait to get my hands on the latest s1evo3s considering how well it's predecessor performed
Helpful 17 - tire reviewed on July 13, 2023
Given 81% while driving a Audi Q5 (235/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 26,000 average miles
These SUV designated tires were audi oe on 2019 Q5 40 tdi. They have been good tires feeling safe in all conditions driven. They have lasted 26000 average driven mixed miles with the outer block now worn out with no groove left. The remaining 75% of the tire is just about on the wear marker. There are cracks appearing between some grooves now so we are getting the same again. All four to change as rotated tires and all have now lost outer blocks due to front wear. Have read that increasing tire pressure a bit can reduce outer block wear on audis so may try that.
Helpful 21 - tire reviewed on April 17, 2023
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Volkswagen (235/55 R18) on mostly motorways for 0 easy going miles
Done 33,000 km. Maybe another 6,000 km
Helpful 27 - tire reviewed on March 26, 2022
Given 81% while driving a Audi Q7 (285/35 R22) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
For the price these are a great tire, fitter was surprised they were Audi original equipment but they are a good tire in the dry and the wet, manage to keep my Q7 safe on the road without complaining. They are not very good in snow but they don’t claim to be and are a summer tire. Massive rim protector too which is a bonus with 22s. At around £100 a corner cheaper than the big names, I cannot fault these.
Helpful 29 - tire reviewed on October 26, 2021
Audi (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,156 average miles
used these tires on the Q7 for over 20k now, still have over 4.0 MM left on the rear tires, although the fronts are ready to replace.
Helpful 31 - tire reviewed on August 21, 2020
Given 80% while driving a Audi Q7 (285/35 R22 W) on mostly motorways for 26,000 average miles
26.000 miles and still enough on all 4 tires to do another 4300 miles, The tires came on a newly bought audi.
to my great surprise the tires a very comfortable, little road noise even not on cobblestone, good grip in rainy weather and enough grip when dry to keep up the pace. Wear &tear much better then expected. will buy this tire again.
Helpful 47 - tire reviewed on February 9, 2019
Given 90% while driving a Volvo XC90 (2) D5 momentum (275/45 R20) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
15000 miles and rear tires still 3my. For a very heavy car that’s really. These are much cheaper than Continentals ( even cheaper than VOL ones!) and I can’t tell the difference. Would buy again from my independent tire dealer
Helpful 42 - tire reviewed on September 22, 2018
Given 54% while driving a Rover Range Rover Sport (220/45 R21) on mostly town for 9,000 easy going miles
Put the Hankook Ventus on my Range Rover sport from tire specialist advice and got 9000km before tires were destroyed. Hankook have washed there hands on the matter. Never buy Hankook again there warranty and backup service is disgusting.
Helpful 34 - tire reviewed on March 27, 2018
Given 70% while driving a Kia Motors Sportage (245/45 R19 V) on a combination of roads for 14,000 average miles
Installed from new. Fronts changed at 14K, Was very disappointed with the wear and life.
Helpful 31 - tire reviewed on March 11, 2018
Given 87% while driving a Volvo XC90 (2) D5 momentum (275/45 R20 W) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
6000lbs car needs good rubber. These are better than the Continentals from the factory. Better grip and less noise. So far (6000miles) have good wearing qualities.
Helpful 37 - tire reviewed on March 8, 2018
Given 85% while driving a Kia Motors Sportage (245/45 R19) on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
On a 2016 Kia Sportage. Around 6mm after 5,000 miles so wearing well, surprising level of grip in both wet and dry. Not really up to much off road grip wise, but take the punishment without getting damaged.

An all round really good tire, would recommend
Helpful 75 - tire reviewed on September 19, 2016