Minerva Ice+ S 110

The Minerva Ice Plus S 110 is a Touring Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tire review data from 3 tire reviews averaging 55% over 26,000 miles driven, and 1 tests with an average result of 51st.

Dry Grip 77%
Wet Grip 53%
Road Feedback 33%
Handling 50%
Wear 77%
Comfort 70%
Buy again 43%
Snow Grip 50%
Ice Grip 40%

The Ice+ S 110 is ranked 88th of 98 Winter Touring tires.

Tests Included

1

Best Result

51st

Worst Result

51st

Average Result

51st

Latest Tire Test Results

2015 Tire Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Minerva Ice Plus S 110

Questions and Answers for the Minerva Ice Plus S 110

2018-10-31 - I can't see the word rotation on them but the side wall has an arrow looking design. Are these tires directional?

The tread pattern looks like it should be Asymmetric, but you would need to see a better quality picture or speak to Minerva to confirm.


Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top 3 Minerva Ice Plus S 110 Reviews

Given 49% while driving a Suzuki Swift 1,2 2013 (175/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
These are 10 years old tires which were fitted on the car as winter tires when I bought it. I haven't had the chance to try them on snow. However, on some wet roads, even after the rain, they don't provide any traction. It's to a point where it's really dangerous. If I start uphill, the wheels will slip in both first and second gears during a mild acceleration. Braking on that kind of road with these tires is really bad. The same thing happens when on wet grass. I've had 10 years old Dunlop winter tires with my last car and they still were great in both conditions until I changed them because they were worn out. These Minerva still have 7-8 mm, so I'll keep them during this summer, hopefully they'll be better when it's warmer.
Helpful 38 - tire reviewed on March 29, 2022
Given 48% while driving a Toyota Paseo ST 1.5 (195/50 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 4,000 average miles
I was very surprised (in a bad way!) after getting these tires fitted (even after the break-in period). With the previous Firestone tires i had to try very hard to lock the wheels up under hard braking, with these Minerva tires i have to try very hard NOT to lock them up on wet roads. Even when moderately braking in corners, the cars starts to skid on wet roads. Aquaplaning resistance is average, i've had Michelins that were worse, but these Minervas don't give any confidence when hitting a puddle of water. When you want to pull out on a junction in a normal manner, the wheels start to spin as they simple don't get any traction, this gets very annoying after a while.. This tire is average on dry roads, it is stiffer than the previous Firestones so handling is ok, although this tire lacks 'feeling' when cornering. Comfort is good and so is the wear rate and they are not super noise either, so that's not too bad. The wear is a bit difficult to measure in an honest manner as you can not drive with these tires without spinning everywhere you go on damp/wet surfaces, so that will speed up the wear process. So to sum it up, a good tire for people that drive like an elderly 95 year old woman that never goes above 30mph and never drives any further than the local church. NOT RECOMMENDED!
Helpful 36 - tire reviewed on February 16, 2021
Given 92% while driving a Volvo S40 T4 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
I Find they are excellent Tires in all conditions and they last about 3 years constantly driving on !
Helpful 32 - tire reviewed on August 17, 2016
Have you driven on the Minerva Ice Plus S 110 tire?

Have YOU got experience with the Minerva Ice Plus S 110? Help millions of other tire buyers

Review your Minerva Ice Plus S 110 >

Latest Minerva Ice Plus S 110 Reviews