Menu
Nexen N2000 View Gallery (1)

Nexen N2000

Nexen Tires High Performance Summer

The Nexen N2000 is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
76%
Road Feedback
77%
Handling
68%
Wear
82%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
79%
14 Reviews
77% Average
199,000 miles driven
Nexen N2000

Nexen N2000

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 14
Avg Rating: 77.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Nexen N2000

Questions and Answers for the Nexen N2000

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nexen N2000. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nexen N2000 Reviews

Given 96% while driving a Renault twingo (185/60 R13) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
These tires are amazing, since the day I discovered them I only used in my car, the control in dry and wet make me feel so comfortable that I do not need to adjust much my driving style for any condition, I basically love those tires. Big fan
Helpful 663
November 22, 2022
Given 56% while driving a Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI (185/55 R14 H) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
These are not great, its not till I replaced these with about 50% tread left on them have I noticed how bad they really are.

The dry grip is nor bad and perfectly safe, but wet is not confidence inspiring and aquaplaning can be quite scary.

They are also quite a harsh ride and the rather noisy.
Helpful 538
January 4, 2016
Given 54% while driving a MG MGF VVC (195/55 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
good enough at the price but wore quickly and didnt inspire much confidence
Helpful 556
December 12, 2012

How would you rate the Nexen N2000?

Click a star to start your review

201 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Nexen N2000 Reviews

Given 87% while driving a MG MGTF (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 12,000 spirited miles
Running these for 18 months - good choice. Wear is barely visible, road feel is very good and the ride is good as well - note my car! Would certainly have Nexen again.
Helpful 539
November 28, 2012
Given 86% while driving a Vauxhall Corsa (185/55 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 23,000 average miles
Had these tires fitted all-round last summer. Impressed with the Eagle F1 look and the cheap price (on offer at the time for ?28.90 each, delivery only.
Living in the sticks they give good feedback on the country roads, and fare very well on the motorway (100+ miles a day).
Will be putting these on my car again...at the right price.
Had these inflated to 40PSI since new and the uneven wear that others have experianced has not affected me.
Helpful 456
December 2, 2010
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 54% while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/50 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Got these as an emergency replacement on the front of my '05 Fiesta. Great when new, plenty of grip and good in the wet. BUT as soon as they had worn enough for the side tread sipe to dissappear, the grip on wet roundabouts just disappeared! If you look at the tread, the middle is actually deeper than the edges, meaning they need changing well before they wear to the legal limit. having them changed wuth 4mm of tread left is not exactly good!
Helpful 483
November 25, 2010
Given 100% while driving a Opel Corsa D z12xep (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Excelent tires,
Helpful 486
October 9, 2010
Given 93% while driving a Renault Clio 1.5 DCi 65 (185/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
First bought these tires without knowing anything about them. Have now bought them again on 2 seperate occasions. The pair I have fitted to the rear of my clio still look almost new after 12 months and around 15,000 miles. Have just replaced the fronts after 20,000+ miles on a FWD 1.5DCi.
Got the new pair for a shade under ?94 all in. Absolute bargain and I definitely recommend them.
Helpful 520
August 5, 2010
Given 74% while driving a Mercedes Benz E240 Elegance (205/55 R15) on mostly motorways for 6,000 average miles
excellent value for money tire - compares well to previous continentals and dunlops used. would buy again
Helpful 494
August 3, 2010
Given 76% while driving a Rover 200Di (185/55 R15 V) on mostly country roads for 5,000 average miles
Was offered these to substitute Falkens just before Xmas and I think I was lucky to agree being suspicious about their low price. Was able to drive in snow in January on the roads where only tractors and 4x4 could be found. Not sure about the wear as too early. Wet grip is fine.
Helpful 491
March 26, 2010
Given 83% while driving a Vauxhall Corsa (185/55 R15 H) on mostly town for 7,000 average miles
Have these tires fitted on 2 Corsas. Are as good as the original factory fitted tires. Great value at around ?40 fitted.Have also proved good in snow.
Helpful 496
January 10, 2010
Given 72% while driving a Volkswagen Passat 1.9Tdi (205/60 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
FOR ?40 A PIECE FULLY FITTED I CANT COMPLAIN ABOUT ANY ASPECT OF THESE TYRES AND WOULD DEFINITELY GET THEM AGAIN
Helpful 515
May 29, 2009
Rate the Nexen N2000