Menu
Yokohama Geolandar G900 View Gallery (1)
215/55-60 R16-17 2 sizes 2003

Yokohama Geolandar G900

The Yokohama Geolandar G900 is a Touring Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.4
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
82%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
69%
Wear
72%
Comfort
70%
Buy again
67%
Snow Grip
70%
Ice Grip
70%
14 Reviews
74% Average
973,230 miles driven
Yokohama Geolandar G900

Yokohama Geolandar G900

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
6.4 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 14
Avg Rating: 73.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.91
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Yokohama Geolandar G900

Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
215/60R16 95 V D C 71
17 inch
215/55R17 94 V D C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Yokohama Geolandar G900 >>

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama Geolandar G900

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Yokohama Geolandar G900. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
215/55 R17 $200.96 - $200.96 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
215/60 R16 $165.97 - $177.96 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
Available in 2 tire sizes - View all.

Top 3 Yokohama Geolandar G900 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Subaru Forester (225/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I was very impressed by this tire (G95 ~ G900) while i drove it in almost every terrain, load, driving style. Road, sand, mud, icy snow, rain, on the limit, fully loaded, peaceful cruise... I can say this is a great ALL rounder. Predictable, versatile, well-balanced (all that added to my 2011 Subaru Forester).
March 24, 2021
Given 94% while driving a Subaru forester 158cv 2.0 auto (215/60 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 50 spirited miles
i am writing this because i see a lot of negative reviews about these geolanders, and poor milage, and blaming the tires, and not the car, or driving. on the originals, i had done klms 80,676 (miles 50,000 plus) i changed them because it was in the winter months, and i had driven more miles than expected , they would have lasted another 2000 miles at least. i am a bit of a heavy bracker. on motorways i nearly always drive at 80/85 mph. and i have driven as 100mph now and again, when road/traffic/ and weather permits. just to give it a clear out. i never had the first set rebalanced. when friends came for holidays i always increased the rear pressure by 2 pounds, and decreased when they went home. i check the pressure monthly when the tires are cold, (at home) before any journey. my second set, i have now driven 60,000 klms, and it is not time for a change yet. and i did have this set rebalanced at 40,000 klms. not driven on snow/ice/grass/ forest trails. yes they are noisy when worn. and YES the car STOPS it it has too.----in SPAIN
October 2, 2020
Subaru Outback (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 30,000 easy going miles
We have used this model tire exclusively on my wife's 2002 Outback. Whilst It performs well, except for one event of very serious aquaplaning in heavy rain, my biggest gripe is the tire longevity. I note that this model is a winter tire, which suggests a soft compound. The problem is that it is sold in sub-tropical South Africa as a general purpose, all terrain tire.

Needless to say, these tires do not give anything like the mileage that they should, when compared with other makes and they are the only make available in SA (subject to correction) talk about a grudge purchase!
July 23, 2017

How would you rate the Yokohama Geolandar G900?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Yokohama Geolandar G900 Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Subaru Outback (215/60 R16 V) on mostly country roads for 100 average miles
These tires are developed for the Subaru Outback and Forester - and they truly meet the Outback well.

This driver has driven thousands of kilometers using so-called premium tires from Nokian, Goodyear and Continental. All of those are much more noisy and uncomfortable, since they transfer any small dents in the road surface in a very unforgiving way, as a consequence of their stiff side walls. Worst of all is the tracking on the uneven and worn road surfaces we have everywhere in Norway.

All of the above mentioned issues were completely cured by installing the G900s - no tracking whatsoever with the Geolandars.
August 11, 2015
Given 90% while driving a Subaru Forester 2.0 XT (215/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 30 spirited miles
All three sets on my Subaru Forester have done 50,000+ kms with some off-road on mountain tracks; the only issue is road noise, I wonder if their C Drive tires are quieter.
August 7, 2014
Given 62% while driving a Subaru Outback (215/55 R17 V) on mostly town for 35,000 easy going miles
Just replaced them after ca 35000km on Subaru Outback driven mostly in the City. Almost worn out completely, which is major negative imho.
There is nothing to complain regarding grip, perhaps dry grip is superior to wet grip.
Relative to modern tires (Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance) these are noisy and noticeably less comfortable. Never felt so much difference after tire replacement.
July 23, 2014
Given 83% while driving a Subaru Outback (215/60 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
These G900s have been fantastic. My driving mixes suburban with country lanes, motorway and the rough gravel perimeter track of an airfield. It includes a fair amount of towing (caravan, glider or box trailer). After 30,000 miles in my ownership (and they weren't necessarily new when I purchased the car), the front tires are still going strong and probably have another 10,000+ worth of tread on them. The rears have just worn to the legal limit inwards from the wall but this is largely as a result of slow punctures in each that I was slow at getting fixed.
Trip computer shows average 33 MPG over the 30,000 miles and the 43 MPG I get sticking to 70 MPH on long motorway journeys (not towing) I consider astonishing for a 2.5 litre petrol engined permanent AWD and I am convinced that these tires are part of achieving that.
I would have no hesitation in paying the £129 fully inclusive price quoted by my local garage to replace, other than that they have said the can do an higher load rated Evergreen for £69 all-in. Money is tight so do I pay for the original equipment replacement or go value brand and risk loosing out on reduced fuel economy or safety risk over the next 30,000 miles?
February 8, 2014
Given 93% while driving a Subaru forester 158cv 2.0 auto (215/60 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 50 average miles
I don't think you can edit a previous review, so this is an addition to the 06 2.0 auto forester below (in spain). I have changed the tires today 17/1/14, at (80,767 kls)>50,186 miles. having the 2 front wheels off 3 days ago, for a look at the pads etc. I checked the tread depth. as I drive close to the kerb on roundabouts to keep a straight line. the nearside front had little on the outside 1/4. but the 3/4 of the tire, plus the offside tire, and the back 2, had 3 1/2 to 4mill. app 5000 more miles (I think). I have only ever done (1 ton) 100 mph, a few times, I think they stick to the road like s--t to a blanket. as I've just had another set fitted I can't say that I don't like them, cos I do. if there is any other news for these tires i'll be back.
January 17, 2014
Given 86% while driving a Subaru forester 158cv 2.0 auto (215/60 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 46,000 average miles
i drive an 06 forester auto. i have done 74000klms (45,981mls) in 7 years today (may/9/13)there is still about 4ml left on, but there is wear at the edges. ag, and the sun (live in spain)have taken there toll, there are hairline cracks in the sidewalls. time to change. i won't say i'm a hard driver, but i don't hang about either. i drive about 80% of the time without er indoors. our motorway speed limit is 120k about 75mph, i normally do 80/85mph without much noise. i have tried 160k 100mph a few times, and i must say it's not that bad. the best tire i have ever had
May 9, 2013
Given 61% while driving a Subaru Forester (215/60 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 500,000 easy going miles
The geolander makes a lot of noise when turning round especially in the underground parkings but overall it has. Served me very well for over 6 years
February 28, 2013
Given 57% while driving a Subaru Outback (225/45 R17 T) on a combination of roads for 45,000 spirited miles
I've covered 45000 miles, keeping to the original supplied Yokohamas untill the last change when I fitted Michelins.I've always thought them noisy on the motorway,the wear rate is poor averaging 16000 miles per pair, although I am hard on tires.
The price, now up to £160 each is horrific.
The grip is great, no complaints there.
Getting the tracking checked was money well spent as well.
Overall, the most expensive by mile/cost. There is something better on the market. Pay £20 more for Michelins & get £50 more value/wear
April 27, 2012
Given 53% while driving a Subaru Outback (215/60 R16) on mostly town for 25,000 average miles
Happy with the tires in every respect EXCEPT for the wear. 32,000km and they all need to be replaced. I got 74,000km out of my Michelins on my previous car (Subaru Impreza) so I know it's not my driving.
August 28, 2010
Given 53% while driving a Subaru Outback (215/55 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 20,000 easy going miles
Great tire in the February '09 snow, never had an issue with traction or safety. The tire is reasonably quiet but I am very unhappy with the wear. I have driven 16,000 miles on this set of tires and I have about 2,000 left at most - this is poor as I don't drive them hard and they cost ?150 each. I will not buy again
September 18, 2009
Given 73% while driving a Subaru Outback (215/55 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 240,000 average miles
Track work limited by tread. Same tire on Forester lasted 35,000 miles but these are done at 24,000.
Subaru's 4WD gives such good grip that most conditions feel 100% secure.
What are the options for replacement?
April 2, 2009
Rate the Yokohama Geolandar G900