Menu

General AltiMAX HP

The General AltiMAX HP is a Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
75%
Wet Grip
64%
Road Feedback
60%
Handling
52%
Wear
55%
Comfort
61%
Buy again
48%
11 Reviews
59% Average
127,905 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 47th)
General AltiMAX HP

General AltiMAX HP

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 0
Period: 2013
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 59.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.15
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2013 54 Tire Braking Test 2013 195/65 R15 47/54 0 metrics
1
Tests
47th
Average
47th
Best
47th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2013 54 Tire Braking Test
195/65 R15 • 2013
47th/54

Questions and Answers for the General AltiMAX HP

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the General AltiMAX HP. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 General AltiMAX HP Reviews

Given 44% while driving a Renault Scenic (205/60 R16) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
Was persuaded to put these on when all my existing tires were near the wear limit. Now had two suffer catastrophic sidewall failure within a few thousand miles. Sidewalls seem to be made of tissue paper! Easily the worst tire I've ever come across.
October 14, 2019
Given 42% while driving a Volkswagen Passat (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
These tires offer good grip in the dry and average in the wet. They have very weak walls and I have had 4 damaged tires due to small pot holes. Very poor strength.
March 10, 2016
Given 79% while driving a Audi A4 (205/60 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 12,500 average miles
At the moment - good tires.
Silent, good grip in dry, on some dust, in the wet and puddle of water on the road. And even in the pouring rain.
Very good in gravel road. But not good on garden grass (a lot of wheelspin). Comfortable and easy to drive. Feedback is good, but it could be better (like Michelin, Pirelli etc.)
But the main plus is that the the full set of NEW tires (4 TYRES) costs 200 EUROS, so they are very CHEAP. For this reason, and for good grip and silent drive, I would buy them again, BUT,
I have only driven 20 000 km which is 12500 miles little over a year and tires are worn little bit too quickly. When I bought, there was 8 mm of pattern. Now there is little below 5 mm pattern. For safe use, under 3 mm I wouldn't go. So I can drive about 10 000 km (6250miles) more. So these tires last only 30 000 km/18750 miles and they are on 3 mm wear. Yes, you can drive them to 1,6mm, but this is too dangerous with rainy conditions.
They have m+s label on them, so you can use them in snowy condition too?
September 29, 2015

How would you rate the General AltiMAX HP?

Click a star to start your review

Latest General AltiMAX HP Reviews

Given 81% while driving a Opel Corsa (185/60 R14 H) on mostly motorways for 37,500 easy going miles
Good tires for those not interested in high performance tires and that has a easy going drive style.
If you are looking for a good tire that lasts very well, I think its a good choice. I used mine for 62.000km and still have rubber to do more 10.000km at least.
It has good grip on dry and curves and it could be a little bit better on wet, but nothing that bad.
October 17, 2013
Given 23% while driving a Ford S Max (225/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
Fitted by local Ford dealer as new replacements - done just under 8000 miles and they need replacing already - budget tires that really aren't worth the money.
Definitely not buying these again and not going to trust the dealership that sold them on!
June 16, 2013
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 86% while driving a Volkswagen Passat (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 26,875 spirited miles
Bought my tires (UHP version) and have religiously rotated at every 10000km. Currently doing 43000km. Not bad considering the treadwear indicator is only 280.
They replaced a full set of Bridgestone Turanzas that had 3mm-4mm on them. The reason being the car was very twitchy on wet roads and I definitely had no confidence on icy roads with them. That changed completely on these tires. Now before anyone says that this is an unfair comparison the tires now have 3mm in front and 2mm in the rear. They too became nervous (only in the wet with standing water) at 3mm. Otherwise I am very happy with them.

I use the car equipped with them in all conditions and now that I am getting ready to replace them will definitely consider getting another set. After all this is really a Continental subbrand that I have done over 40000km with.
November 26, 2012
Given 50% while driving a Audi A4 2.0 TDI 140 SLine (225/45 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 8,000 spirited miles
As member of the NTA and a general tire dealer I was interested in sampling the Altimax on my Audi A4 TDI, having sold a number of it's big brother the Grabber. BF Goodrich came off the car and replaced all with the General. Instantly I could recognise the difference in performance with the soft side walls giving the car a very juicey feel around the bends. Performance on front is struggling to make it to 10k miles. Very close to budget quality tire and will be trying the BFG G-grip in future.
June 13, 2012
Given 84% while driving a Citroën C4 (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 7,000 spirited miles
Very good tires for the price. Excellent dry and wet grip. Good resistance to impact and feedback. A bit noisy but I'd buy it again.
February 3, 2012
Given 79% while driving a Volvo V70 2.5 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I can not say many bad things about these tires, When it come to buying these they were a cheaper tire compare to other tire i.e bridgestone and continental's.

Not only are they cheaper they have performed much better then any other tire i have driven on they are very good when it come's to wet weather compared to other tires mainly because of there directional pattern. Also the very good feature i like is how if your not good with telling were the wear bars are or even understanding them it has a bit of text saying "Replacement Tire Monitor" Which once wore down turn into "Replace Tire" very neat extra.

But any way back to writing about the qaulity of the tire, now sadly they havent got the best comfort in the world but to be honest it isnt to noticble but i rather and a 4 star comfort tire and a 10 star wear tire then a 10 star comfort tire and a 4 star wear tire. That the main and only draw back i can find with in these tire now i found many people call this a mid range tire to be honest place that sold them to me told me there a premium tire and i 100% agree with them. I Highly recommend people to try these as i rate the highly and will carry on buying these over many other brands as like i said it says me alot of money and i get much better tire.
October 28, 2011
Given 46% while driving a Peugeot 307 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30 average miles
Guma je srednja zalost, vise zalost nego srednja, na mokrom lose skroz koci, proklizava pri kretanju, cak i u preticanju, 2-3 brzina zna pocet proklizavati..

Tire is very bad on wet road, breaking is really poor with this tires..
October 21, 2011
Rate the General AltiMAX HP