Citroën C4 Picasso (2013 ) Tires

On this page you will find the best real world tire reviews from owners of the Citroën C4 Picasso (2013 ).

Do you Drive a Citroën C4 Picasso (2013 )? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire! After all, who knows what the best tire for a C4 Picasso (2013 ) better than the owners?

Review Your Tires >>

Tire Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Achilles Winter 101 (9) 84% 84% 86% 83% 84% 84%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season (23) 78% 82% 75% 78% 78% 84%
Michelin Primacy 3 (191) 85% 79% 76% 77% 69% 80%
Michelin Energy XM2 (52) 80% 74% 73% 74% 86% 73%
Uniroyal RainSport 5 (70) 76% 86% 69% 68% 76% 80%

Citroën C4 Picasso (2013 ) Tire Review Highlights

Writing about the Michelin Primacy 3 given 86% (205-55-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
When I bought a NEW C4 Picasso 1.6 BlueHDi 88/120 was year 2016 equiped with those Micheline Premacy 3 with DOTxx16 "first half of the year 16", and now I will replace them all with four (4) NEW Bridgestone Turanza 6. With Premacy 3I made mostly easy going driving through all 6 years of driving. First year I made 21000km mixed al roads and 70% was highway driving - summer season with averge fuel consumption 4.7l/100km through full diesel tank and mixed all type of roads. The rest 43000 kilometers I made in next five (5) years. For my style of driving, is that type of tire the best one, but the price for the NEW Premacy 4+ si to high for me...Bridgestone Turanza 6 is cheaper.
tire reviewed on 2023-03-22 12:47:09
Writing about the Uniroyal RainSport 5 given 57% (195-55-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 9000 spirited miles
I'm very disappointed about this tires. I regret my Michelin energy saver +. Avoid this tire definitely.
tire reviewed on 2021-04-03 08:50:51
Writing about the Nexen N Blue 4 Season given 80% (205-60-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 30000 average miles
I use the tires on a citreon c4 picasso II. Almost a year now i've driven on almost all conditions. I was impressed on the ice and snow performance. While on daily normal commute i never used snow chains except on heavy snowstorm at the mountains. I was really curious about the summer performance, because at my area gets really hot for a long period. The tire performed really good even at high speeds while the temperature was above 38 Celsius. I noticed a little problem on aquaplaning,maybe more than i expected. Overall a really honest tire that has nothing to be jealous from the high end brands. Definitely buy them again.
tire reviewed on 2019-10-06 17:43:23
Writing about the Achilles Winter 101 given 100% (225-45-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 5000 miles
great tire!
tire reviewed on 2018-02-13 06:12:58
Writing about the Michelin Energy XM2 given 74% (205-60-16-V)
Driving on mostly motorways for 1500 average miles
Fitted a pair to replace the stock Energy Saver when the front right sidewall was gashed by a kerb. I can be a bit of a lil' hoonigan sometimes, especially when turning right at junctions (we drive on the left here) and pulling out from side roads or at roundabouts. These are better under heavy acceleration, much more difficult to induce wheelspin on them than with the Savers (given the 270Nm of torque the engine can muster) and importantly the kerb protection is quite good compared to other tires I have tried. Cornering does not seem to be a strong point, press on and you will feel significant understeer and it seems quite hard to tell when the tires are approaching their limit. However noise and wear are my priorities and these tires seem to deliver on both fronts, especially when you can enjoy blissful silence at expressway speeds. I would fit them again to my next car, but they're kind of expensive here.
tire reviewed on 2016-12-22 02:54:10
Drive this car? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire