Suzuki Splash SZ4 Tires

On this page you will find the best real world tire reviews from owners of the Suzuki Splash SZ4.

Do you Drive a Suzuki Splash SZ4? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire! After all, who knows what the best tire for a Splash SZ4 better than the owners?

Review Your Tires >>

Tire Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (19) 92% 86% 83% 74% 84% 88%
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 (9) 87% 83% 83% 88% 87% 80%
Michelin Energy Saver Plus (63) 83% 71% 78% 76% 91% 82%
Ovation W 586 (4) 77% 83% 75% 78% 87% 88%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance (247) 86% 84% 76% 78% 73% 85%
Nexen N Blue HD Plus (70) 83% 79% 77% 75% 76% 84%

Suzuki Splash SZ4 Tire Review Highlights

Writing about the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 given 84% (185-60-15-)
Driving on mostly town for 13000 average miles
Excellent tire in all conditions, minus snow and ice. V e r y silent and at a great price. Have it in my 3 family cars. I am not certain about the wear, it is still early. Otherwise, fully recomendable
tire reviewed on 2022-07-21 09:35:41
Writing about the Nexen N Blue HD Plus given 0% (185-60-15-)
Driving on mostly town for 17000 average miles
After 3 years and 25.000km, the braking distance has deteriorated and the handling in slippery tarmac needs attention.They haven’t become dangerous, not at all. But It seems that they are a little less durable than the average norm. I read on this site that the Chech made version of this Tire isn’t as good. Since the ones available were Chech made, I finally opted for the Kleber Dynaxer 4.
tire reviewed on 2021-05-03 06:25:35
Writing about the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 given 87% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 23000 average miles
Had these tires on three different cars, logan,sandero, now a splash,roughly 23000 miles,and still going good in the wet &snow.only gripe noisy.hey no worries,wood buy again. Great value.tc.
tire reviewed on 2020-09-27 07:21:47
Writing about the Nexen N Blue HD Plus given 85% (185-60-15-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 600 average miles
Excellent aquaplanning ! Plus, a low noise tire, with top dry grip and breaking ! Wet grip is good ,wet breaking seems average . Feedback is not on par with my previous Michelen Energy Saver + or with Contis . Value for money is excellent. !
tire reviewed on 2018-05-07 07:57:35
Writing about the Nexen N Blue HD Plus given 85% (185-60-15-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 600 average miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2018-05-06 12:31:56
Writing about the Michelin Energy Saver Plus given 89% (185-60-15-)
Driving on mostly town for 20 average miles
VERY durable tire and very reliable . Grips and handles great , ever after almost 4 years use. You pay premium price but the tire is of premium quality as well . I just feel that through time ,the tire has become a bit harder for my (already firm Japanese) suspension .
tire reviewed on 2018-04-02 10:21:32
Writing about the Ovation W 586 given 81% (165-45-16-)
Driving on mostly town for 1000 average miles
Put these tires on the car last winter, didn't really have any snow and the weather was fairly mild, so really didn't test the tires in bad conditions, didn't notice much difference in the dry weather, slightly better wet grip, and appeared good on ice as compared to factory fitted all season tires. Petrol consumption did suffer with a loss of approx 5 miles per gallon.
tire reviewed on 2014-12-01 10:02:18
Writing about the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance given 61% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly town for 14000 easy going miles
On a small hatchback, driven carefully, front tires lasted less than 14K miles. I had not expected this and was both appalled and very shocked to be told that the front tires were bordering on illegal after so few miles.
No, I will not be buying these again.
tire reviewed on 2014-11-08 08:18:38
Drive this car? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire