2019 17 inch Track Day Tire Test

Test Publication:
Unknown
Test Size: 225/45 R17
Tires Tested: 5 tires
Test Categories:
2 categories (4 tests)
Similar Tests

Test Category Best Performer Worst Performer Difference
Dry (3 tests)
Dry Braking Yokohama Advan A052: 24.1 M Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R: 29.3 M5.2 M (17.7%)
Dry Handling Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R: 90.24 s Continental Premium Contact 6: 91.8 s1.6 s (1.7%)
Subj. Dry Handling Yokohama Advan A052: 10 Points Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222: 7 Points3.0 Points (42.9%)
Wet (1 tests)
Wet Braking Yokohama Advan A052: 16.55 M Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222: 20.15 M3.6 M (17.9%)
Track day tire tests are always a welcome read, as those of us who use our cars on track are often super switched on to the differences the tires can make. This year AutoMail.Ru have tested four track day tires in 225/45 R17 using a Mazda MX5 Cup car, and included the Continental PremiumContact 6 as a reference "normal" tire.

It's worth remembering the MX5 is a light, relatively low powered car, so the results from this test might be different on something heavier.

Dry

As proven in previous tests, for all out pace the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R is hard to beat, and it again sets the quickest dry handling time of the test. Curiously, even though the Russian track Magnitogorsk is a long lap, the road-bias PremiumContact 6 is on pace with the track tires, which they've said was due to the lower rolling resistance allowing a higher top speed on the straights... 

The dry braking tests were done when the tires were cold, to replicate how they'd be used on the road, not track. This is why the Continental PremiumContact 6 placed so well. Once warm, the track day tires should have a significant advantage over the road bias tire.

Subjectively, the Yokohama A052 scored the best, but again interestingly the Continental matched the Trofeo R and beat the other two track tires on test. A curious result, but then the PremiumContact 6 is proving to be an excellent handling tire.

Wet

The wet braking data wasn't conducted on a proper wet braking surface, and had very little water depth, meaning these results should be taken as a guide rather than gospel. With any actual water depth, the track day tires would have performed much worse, for example the A052 starts with 4.4mm tread depth where as the PremiumContact 6 is 7.4mm, with the lower tread depth vastly reducing the tires ability to clear standing water.

Results

1st: Yokohama Advan A052

Yokohama Advan A052
  • 225/45 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking1st24.1 M100%
Dry Handling2nd90.3 s90.24 s+0.06 s99.93%
Subj. Dry Handling1st10 Points100%
Wet Braking1st16.55 M100%
Forgiving of mistakes, greatest cornering grip, good wet grip.
Expensive, high wear, not designed for heavy rain.
Similar handling to the Trofeo R, but very novice friendly as it forgives over driving. The A052 doesn't require a strong warmup, and it keeps its peak grip for 2-3 laps before settling into its race pace. Even when worn to the limit the pace remains strong!

Very high treadwear for a 200 tire, 100-120 seems more realistic.

Read Reviews

2nd: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
  • 225/45 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking3rd25 M24.1 M+0.9 M96.4%
Dry Handling3rd91.53 s90.24 s+1.29 s98.59%
Subj. Dry Handling4th7 Points10 Points-3 Points70%
Wet Braking2nd17.35 M16.55 M+0.8 M95.39%
Universal tire for different weather conditions, less overheating than Hankook RS3.
Average feedback, high price, moderate lateral cornering.
Nicely balanced on the Mazda, but poor reactions to large steering lock so not ideal for beginners. The tire doesn't overheat much, and allows for constant laptimes. A good wet performance means this tire could be a good choice as an everyday tire, but for the price you could get the Hankook for track and Continental for road.

Read Reviews

3rd: Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222

Hankook Ventus RS3 Z222
  • 225/45 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking4th26.5 M24.1 M+2.4 M90.94%
Dry Handling3rd91.53 s90.24 s+1.29 s98.59%
Subj. Dry Handling4th7 Points10 Points-3 Points70%
Wet Braking5th20.15 M16.55 M+3.6 M82.13%
Steer reactions to steering, good lap time for a low price, good wear resistance.
Relatively quick overheating, softer sidewalls, low wet grip.
The Hankook is very good at high speed turning, but as the speeds decrease and the steering angle increases the softer sidewall shows itself.

A great time attack tire but overheats after a couple of laps.

Read Reviews

4th: Continental Premium Contact 6

Continental Premium Contact 6
  • 225/45 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking1st24.1 M100%
Dry Handling5th91.8 s90.24 s+1.56 s98.3%
Subj. Dry Handling2nd9 Points10 Points-1 Points90%
Wet Braking3rd17.65 M16.55 M+1.1 M93.77%
Lowest rolling resistance, good lap time, short braking in the dry and wet.
High wear on track.
While the tire has more understeer and less steering speed than the track day tires, it still provides an excellent laptime.

Read Reviews    Buy from £89.17

5th: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R

Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
  • 225/45 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
Test#ResultBestDifference%
Dry Braking5th29.3 M24.1 M+5.2 M82.25%
Dry Handling1st90.24 s100%
Subj. Dry Handling2nd9 Points10 Points-1 Points90%
Wet Braking3rd17.65 M16.55 M+1.1 M93.77%
Fastest dry lap time, good overheating resistance, quick steering speed.
Not good on the road, long wet braking.
The Trofeo R has the sharpest steering in all conditions, and unlike the other tires on test, showed no signs of overheating. Needed a lot of warm up, hence not being the ideal tire to also be used on the road.

Read Reviews

comments powered by Disqus