Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 to find out which tire is best for your own driving.
There are a few basic differences between the two tires. The Vredestein Ultrac Pro is an Max-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tires directly!
Out of these three tests:
- Vredestein Ultrac Pro finished ahead of the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 in two of the tests
- Yokohama Advan Sport V107 finished ahead of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro in one of the tests
While it might look like the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is better than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 3.94% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:35M | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 33.8M |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:36.6M | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 34.8M |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:35M | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 33.8M |
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 1.92% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:117.4Km/H | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 119.7Km/H |
Wet Braking
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 1.41% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:31.2M | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 31.8M |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:31M | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 31.2M |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:48.8M | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 49.6M |
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 0.53% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:37.5M | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 37.7M |
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 0.14% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:71.3Km/H | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 71.4Km/H |
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was 1.1% faster around a wet circle than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:15.24s | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 15.41s |
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro floated at a 3.19% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:79.1Km/H | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 75.9Km/H |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:80.7Km/H | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 78.8Km/H |
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro slipped out at a 2.52% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:3m/sec2 | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 2.9m/sec2 |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:3.35m/sec2 | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 3.3m/sec2 |
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 22% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:5 Points | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 3.9 Points |
Noise
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro measured 1.62% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:71.8dB | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 72.9dB |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:73.5dB | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 74.8dB |
Wear
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wear tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is predicted to cover 3.89% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wear: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:40100KM | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 34300KM |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:32930KM | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 35890KM |
Value
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one value tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro proved to have a 1.47% better value based on price/1000km than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Value: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:11.57Price/1000 | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 13.18Price/1000 |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:11.18Price/1000 | ✓ Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 9.92Price/1000 |
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro had a 13.47% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:9.19kg / t | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 10.62kg / t |
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
Vredestein Ultrac Pro:5.7l/100km | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 5.7l/100km |
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro emitted 20.53% less particle wear matter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/40 R18 |
✓ Vredestein Ultrac Pro:75.5mg/km/t | Yokohama Advan Sport V107: 95mg/km/t |
Real World Driver Reviews
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro and Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
In total the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tire 90% overall.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V107 has been reviewed 15 times and drivers have given the tire 75% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Wet grip is also very handsome. You really feel comfortable driving in heavy rain, and the grip is also very reassuring. Especially in the wet
Conclusion
In conclusion the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, subj. comfort, noise, wear, value, rolling resistance and abrasion, while the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [km/h] and wet handling [km/h].
Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in fuel consumption, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Vredestein Ultrac Pro seems to be the best tire overall.
However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.
Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Overall Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.
Best Tire Tests
Best UUHP Tires- Best Performance Summer Tires
- Best Summer Tires
Best All Season Tires- Best UHP All Season Tires
- Best All Weather Tires
Best Winter Tires- Best UHP Winter Tires
- Best SUV Winter Tires
- Best Studless Winter Tires
- Best All Terrain [AT] Tires
- Best SUV Summer Tires
Summer Tire Tests
- Best Performance Tires For 2025
- The Best Touring Tires for 2025 Tested
- 2025 Sport and Hypersport Motorcycle Tire Test
- 2025 Teknikens Varld Summer Tire Test
- 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tire Test
- 2025 Al Volante Summer Tire Test
- 2025 Sports Cars Tire Test
- 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tire Test
- All Summer Tire Tests
All Season Tire Tests
- The BEST All Terrain Tire for 2025
- The Best All Season Tires for 2024 / 2025
- The Best All Season Tires for 2024
- Best All Terrain Tires Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024]
- 2024 Sport Auto All Season Tire Test
- 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test
- 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tire Test
- 2024 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
- All All Season Tire Tests
Winter Tire Tests
- The BEST Performance Winter Tires for 2024 / 2025
- 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tire Test
- 2024 Studded Tire Test
- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test
- 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tire Test
- All Winter Tire Tests
Features
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2 - Real World Review
- Understanding The Tire Sidewall
- EU Tire Label
- Summer VS All Season VS Winter
- Road vs Track vs Slick Tires
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs 4S * (BMW)
- OE vs Aftermarket Tires
- Winter Tires Tested at 0c to15c
Tire Reviews
General
- Submit your review
- About Tire Reviews
- Tire Reviews Ethics
- Site Map
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Contact Tire Reviews
