Dry Braking

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P stopped the vehicle in 1.24% less distance than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Dry Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was 1.62% faster around a lap than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was 0.49% faster around a lap than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.51% less distance than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.27% less distance than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was 2.14% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]:

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was 1.44% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Wet Circle: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P floated at a 1.41% higher speed than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Straight Aqua: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P slipped out at a 7.03% higher speed than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P stopped the vehicle in 2.68% less distance than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Snow Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P had 1.16% better snow traction than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 was 2.36% faster around a lap than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was 0.92% faster around a lap than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during zero snow circle tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P provided 0.44% more lateral grip than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was 2.12% faster through a slalom than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Snow Slalom: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 stopped the vehicle 3.94% shorter than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Best In Ice Braking: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during three noise tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P measured 1.24% quieter than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Noise: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during zero wear tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is predicted to cover 23.29% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Wear: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during one value tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 proved to have a 26.79% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Best In Value: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during one price tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P cost 7.65% less than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Price: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P had a 11.65% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin Alpin 6.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Best In Fuel Consumption:

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 emitted 28.17% less particle wear matter than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin Alpin 6

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>