Menu

Admiral 712

The Admiral 712 is a Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
50%
Wet Grip
39%
Road Feedback
47%
Handling
43%
Wear
51%
Comfort
41%
Buy again
27%
7 Reviews
43% Average
70,200 miles driven
Admiral 712

Admiral 712

Summer Budget
BETA
5.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 42.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.28
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Admiral 712

Questions and Answers for the Admiral 712

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Admiral 712. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Admiral 712 Reviews

Given 31% while driving a MG MGF NON VVC (205/50 R15) on mostly town for 4,000 average miles
Without doubt the WORST tires I have ever had on any car.

Had these fitted at £45 a wheel (all in). I know thats cheap, but I still expect a tire to be able to hold its own when dry and in a straight line.

At the time I had a RWD 130BHP MGF and these were put on the rear. After less than 4000 miles they had just 3mm of tread left which is astonishingly poor - I could understand it if they were a very soft compound on a powerful, heavy RWD but 65bhp a wheel is not that much on a car weighing 1000kg.

They span in the dry, the span in the wet (managed snow ok for some unknown reason), they aquaplaned like mad in anything other than a 1mm deep puddle. They lost traction and nearly span me out on a roundabout at 9 mph, 9!!!

Noise was not too bad and to be fair they did feel ok when driving around town in the dry with a smooth ride.

WHAT EVERY YOU DO - DO NOT TOUCH THESE WITH A BARGE POLE LET ALONE YOUR ALLOYS
January 19, 2012
Given 31% while driving a Ford Mondeo (205/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 40,000 easy going miles
Cheap and very nasty.

These were on the back of my car when I bought it. They are easily the noisiest tires I've ever had. In fact they were so noisy that I actually replaced my rear wheel bearings thinking they were at fault. One of them was also off balance despite being done three times at different garages.
When I replaced them with new Michelin Energys the car was transformed to what it should always have been.

My driving style has always been steady rather than fast, so grip has never been a problem. I would definitely never use these again.
September 20, 2011
Given 32% while driving a Citroën Saxo VTS (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 200 average miles
Wet grip is terrible, they nearly get you killed.

A cheap terrible tire, the khumo 712 that this is a copy of was a reasonable the.

Simply the worst !
September 15, 2013

How would you rate the Admiral 712?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Admiral 712 Reviews

Given 31% while driving a Saab Automobile 900S (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
My Mechanic installed 4 tires on my Saab. The front tire broke a bead only months after install. The car was hopping up and down until I replaced the tire.
June 18, 2013
Given 39% while driving a Honda Accord (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
Tires came with the car. I have done just under 30 000km's with little wear. Very noisey - Tire compound ver hard. Tires shudder under hard cornering. Unsure in the wet. Will be replacing these with NT5000's
September 21, 2011
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 34% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
when i bought my car in JAN 10, the previous owner had put these tires on the front, with about 50% usage,
I thought they were an ok tire, however after 5-6 months later it started getting sloppy, and the traction control kicked in more often ,even at slow speeds!
i carried on with them as it went thought a VW service fine in AUG 10 but "all needed replacing soon".
As winter came i just forgot about them and got used to it.. until the snow hit the UK and my car was absolutely useless.. cutting a long story short i had them replaced in jan 11 with horrified faces when they took them off, the whole inside of the tire had shredded, and the inner wall showing through, and could of blown out any day. very lucky!!

my driving i would class as average, with the occasional pedal to the metal, but shocked how quick they wore down in under a year! BAD

These tires should not be for front wheel drive cars with a high bhp. they should be suited to 1.1-1.6 only!! they cant handle anything above!
April 4, 2011
Rate the Admiral 712