Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 Reviews - Page 4

Suzuki (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 450 easy going miles
A very noisey tire on certain road surfaces. Too soon to comment on any other characteristics. Only 3 months old and 450miles.
Helpful 25 - tire reviewed on November 9, 2017
Given 50% while driving a Toyota Altis (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 15,000 average miles
I was so disappointed with this Japan made tires...I m definitely wouldn't buy it again
Helpful 147 - tire reviewed on July 1, 2017
Given 61% while driving a Suzuki CELERIO (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
Day to day the tire suits the car, with decent grip in both dry and wet conditions. At town speeds the steering feels direct but has little road feel. This becomes more acute when cruising at higher speeds on roads with curves and undulations.
The worst problem has been the rate of wear.
After 6000 miles the front tires have both lost a minimum of 2mm of tread across the full width of each tire and the outside edge of the nearside tire has lost 3mm.
The rear tires have lost 1mm generally but nearly 2mm on the outside edge of the nearside wheel. After a four wheel alignment showed the suspension was all within manufacturers tolerances, it was suggested that persistent high speed cornering around right hand bends was the possible cause!
A first example of such wear and suggested cause after 17 long term cars!
Suzuki's recommended 39psi at the front and 36psi at the rear, presumably to facilitate the incredible 66 mpg average we have obtained measured brim to brim, may well be part of the problem. Tire rotation is a short term remedy but long term a more enduring tire is needed such the legendary long lived Michelin products.
Helpful 19 - tire reviewed on April 4, 2017
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 51% while driving a Skoda Rapid TDI (185/60 R15) on mostly motorways for 31,068 spirited miles
These tires are economical and ecological but on the wet road are really dangerous.
If you cross the limit of the grip, you cannot stop sliding. Wear is bad also.
I don't recommend.
Helpful 72 - tire reviewed on November 8, 2016
Given 79% while driving a Volkswagen Passat 2.0TDI (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Grip, steering precision and comfort are premium-class, but wore out quite quickly (after 20,000km there is still 4 to 5mm left, so it's not too bad). Everything else was great. Driving has been "easy going" mostly, but sometimes I have pushed them harder on curvy country roads and I always accelerate quite fast.
Helpful 357 - tire reviewed on April 21, 2016
Given 96% while driving a Citroën C Elysee (185/65 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 9,000 average miles
For me it was a very good tire, on wet road tire has a good grip, also in dry. Will buy them again.
Helpful 14 - tire reviewed on April 2, 2016
Given 96% while driving a Toyota Avensis (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
Best summer tires for my avensis T22 so far, I ride aggressively, not avoiding wet/rain, no complaints, maybe only wear, I marked it for 7, because after 2 summers they are nearly out, hopefully they will survive upcoming summer which would be great, otherwise they are perfect. Will buy them again.
Helpful 14 - tire reviewed on February 4, 2016
Honda 1.8 VTi (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Very good tires on bad roads in Pakistan much more resistance than Yokohama Advan db.Would buy it again.
Helpful 11 - tire reviewed on October 20, 2015
Toyota 2014 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 5,000 average miles
Installed on my Toyota Corolla 2014 an year ago 205 65 15 ecopia ep150 satisfied with its performance but Yokohama Advan db on my other corolla of same model same size drive is much softer and comfortable pleasure
Helpful 12 - tire reviewed on June 17, 2015
Given 81% while driving a Toyota Yaris (185/60 R15 H) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
Aside from noise (not quieter, perhaps noisier than OE Dunlop SP 2030) and dubious fuel consumption claims (from our experience, fuel consumption is no better or worse than before), these Bridgestones are very good tires. Good grip in the dry and wet, and I can actually get some useful road and steering feedback through the otherwise wimpy Yaris steering system!
Helpful 11 - tire reviewed on June 10, 2015
Given 48% while driving a Nissan Pulsar Ti (195/60 R16) on mostly country roads for 0 average miles
Brand new tires fitted to Nissan Pulsar 2013. After only 17,000Km the both front tires had to be replaced. The rear tires are good for only about another 2,000Km. This is after only 6 months of driving. Very unhappy.
Helpful 10 - tire reviewed on September 28, 2014
Given 81% while driving a Hyundai Getz (175/65 R14) on mostly motorways for 31,000 easy going miles
I drove with them for about 50.000 km (3 years) mostly on main-roads but also on a variety of other type of roads (all in Greece).
I am very satisfied generally with them. Never had a flat tire or other malfunction (although I 've fallen on nasty potholes, climbed some pavements etc) which is an important aspect to consider. After all this use they sow their age but they still have some more miles to cover before i replace them. (Only) negative: quite noisy for my taste. Would by again: Yes!
Helpful 10 - tire reviewed on September 27, 2014