Continental UltraContact UC6 Reviews - Page 2

Given 60% while driving a Volkswagen Polo 6R 1.2 TSI MT (205/50 R16) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
Changed from CPC2 to UC6. Was on 215/45/16 with the CPC2, unfortunately couldn't get the same size so had to settle for the closest which is 205/50/16. Was extremely happy with the CPC2, ended up clocking 70,000 KM with it, pretty bald when I changed. Overall handling feels ok, I'm using them on my VW Vento 1.2 turbo. As it is still pretty new, dry and wet braking as well as handling all feels good, but the UC6 is definitely softer than my previous CPC2. The sidewall feels way softer, can feel it clearly during corners, somewhat wobbly feel. I initially thought it is due to the increased ratio but 45 on 215 is almost the same as 50 on 205, not that much different. I am still on 32PSI, will try increasing it to see if the sidewall hardens up. I still don't know if I'll buy again, but if it lasts more than 50,000 KM then it is a bang for bucks for this workhorse of mine.
Helpful 41 - tire reviewed on January 19, 2022
Given 63% while driving a Toyota Raize (225/50 R18) on mostly town for 100 easy going miles
I bought this tire because a lot of positive review how comfort this tire rating, i replace my stock tire dunlop enasave ec300 with tihis UC6. Im really dissapoint how very noisy this tire compare to dunlop because this tire almost 3 times more pricey than enasave.
Helpful 32 - tire reviewed on December 27, 2021
Given 81% while driving a Volkswagen Golf IV 1.9 TDI 110 (195/65 R15) on mostly country roads for 40 spirited miles
I live in Taiwan and drive a Golf with 15 inch rims. I drive up and down twisty, windy, mountain roads for fun. I had a pair of Michelin Energy Savers before, and they lasted only 30,000 kms before they started sliding around corners and needed to be replaced. There are few 15 inch replacements here, so when I saw the Continentals I bought them. These UC6's give awesome grip in the wet and the dry and I'm up to 40,000 kms and still have maybe another 5000 left before they need to be replaced. The noise level on the highway is similar to the Michelins but the performance upgrade is way better on these tires. I will definitely buy them again.
Helpful 27 - tire reviewed on December 26, 2021
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 99% while driving a Toyota Corolla Altis (205/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 13,000 average miles
I have been using these tires in my corolla from 20,000kms. To be honest, they are the best tires I have had so far. Dry grip and braking is just superb, and even on rain sometimes it grips so good that it feels like i'm on dry patch instead of a wet one. Soft and comfortable tires with pretty less noise. Noise has increased a little, but that's pretty common at this mileage. Make sure you protect sidewalls as they're pretty soft. 10/10 for this tire. Truly its ultra contact.
Helpful 29 - tire reviewed on September 10, 2021
Given 66% while driving a Mercedes Benz GLC 250 4 Matic (255/45 R20) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
I was looking for quiet and comfy tire for my SUV. This is it. So coming from that point of view. These tires meet the requirements and nothing more. Definitely not a sporty tire, installed on not a sporty car.
Helpful 70 - tire reviewed on March 22, 2021
Given 46% while driving a Honda Civic (215/55 R16 V) on mostly town for 0 average miles
I used these tires for only 2 days, there was a bad sway in my car soon after putting in those tires, lousy and heavy too, car became sluggish , there was a visible difference in accelerations, i did not expect continental tires to be this bad, i have used MC 5 , Primacy 4 but this sway was so bad that i changes the tires in just 2 days to primacy 4
Helpful 53 - tire reviewed on February 17, 2021
Given 74% while driving a Nissan Elgrand e52 (235/55 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
Fitted to replace the previous Michelin Latitude Your HP. Great improvement in dry traction, the Michelin would slip very easily when setting off. Wet traction is also better, and under hard braking abs never came on. There was plenty of dry grip, a welcome improvement over the previous set, much the same for wet grip which was very reassuring. Steering feel is more direct and intuitive providing a higher level of feedback from the road, but ride comfort overall was still on the softer side, not much changed here, except for how these tires make no squeals or scrubbing sounds when driven on painted parking lot surfaces like the Michelins did. The tire is also very predictable and stable at higher speeds. Overall tread noise stayed roughly the same level but with a slightly hollow tone compared to the gritty rumble from the Michelin, generated mostly from the contact to our rough roads, on smoother freshly paved sections there isn't any noticeable difference. These didn't last as long as the Michelins (25k miles vs 30k miles), but they were being driven much harder in comparison thanks to the improvement in handling and grip. I was forced to keep them on the car right down to the tread wear indicators, due to a tire shortage in our area caused by the pandemic. The tires did suffer from higher wear on the outer shoulder blocks, more severe on the tires mounted at the front (I tried to keep the tires inflated at 39-37 psi). However, I was very disappointed when one of the tires started causing steering vibrations. The problem slowly developed and got worse over time, and I ended up visiting the tire shop several times to rebalance the wheel. Finally found out that the tire was not wearing round; a section nearly two hand widths on the tire had worn down noticeably closer to the bottom of the tread grooves than the rest of the tire, which was clearly visible when the wheel was off the car at the time we identified it (the vibration leading up to that day was particularly severe). I doubt it was caused by a lockup. As mentioned earlier this tire handles hard braking just fine, especially with the rather undersized brakes on this car and on top of this there was a decent reduction in vibration which lasted temporarily with each balancing. So with the tire shortage we had to mount the tire back on the car after balancing, this time on the rear. There was no bulge in the actual carcass of the tire, even when inspected from the inside, and by the time I finally replaced this set of tires it had worn back to being round again. As far as I know, I am the only person who has had this problem with this tire in my area and I cannot find anything about this issue online. The tire mechanics said they hadn't seen anything like it, which was why they didn't suspect this as the culprit of the vibration for so long. I was previously considering the Continental MC6's for our Volvo S60 but decided against it since they are manufactured in the same location. On another note, I ended up replacing them with a set of the new Bridgestone RE004's (had no idea they existed until I visited my local Bridgestone distributor) and would like to leave a review of those as well, but they are not on the site yet and I've yet to receive an email response for the past 3 months now after using both 'suggest a tire' and 'contact tire reviews' (also had an inquiry about the Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2 tires which ended up on the aforementioned Volvo S60, as their tread pattern does not resemble any of the images found online).
Helpful 39 - tire reviewed on January 5, 2021
Given 74% while driving a Nissan Elgrand e52 (235/55 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
Fitted to replace the previous Michelin Latitude Your HP. Great improvement in dry traction, the Michelin would slip very easily when setting off. Wet traction is also better, and under hard braking abs never came on. There was plenty of dry grip, a welcome improvement over the previous set, much the same for wet grip which was very reassuring. Steering feel is more direct and intuitive providing a higher level of feedback from the road, but ride comfort overall was still on the softer side, not much changed here, except for how these tires make no squeals or scrubbing sounds when driven on painted parking lot surfaces like the Michelins did. The tire is also very predictable and stable at higher speeds. Overall tread noise stayed roughly the same level but with a slightly hollow tone compared to the gritty rumble from the Michelin, generated mostly from the contact to our rough roads, on smoother freshly paved sections there isn't any noticeable difference. These didn't last as long as the Michelins (25k miles vs 30k miles), but they were being driven much harder in comparison thanks to the improvement in handling and grip. I was forced to keep them on the car right down to the tread wear indicators, due to a tire shortage in our area caused by the pandemic. The tires did suffer from higher wear on the outer shoulder blocks, more severe on the tires mounted at the front (I tried to keep the tires inflated at 39-37 psi). However, I was very disappointed when one of the tires started causing steering vibrations. The problem slowly developed and got worse over time, and I ended up visiting the tire shop several times to rebalance the wheel. Finally found out that the tire was not wearing round; a section nearly two hand widths on the tire had worn down noticeably closer to the bottom of the tread grooves than the rest of the tire, which was clearly visible when the wheel was off the car at the time we identified it (the vibration leading up to that day was particularly severe). I doubt it was caused by a lockup. As mentioned earlier this tire handles hard braking just fine, especially with the rather undersized brakes on this car and on top of this there was a decent reduction in vibration which lasted temporarily with each balancing. So with the tire shortage we had to mount the tire back on the car after balancing, this time on the rear. There was no bulge in the actual carcass of the tire, even when inspected from the inside, and by the time I finally replaced this set of tires it had worn back to being round again. As far as I know, I am the only person who has had this problem with this tire in my area and I cannot find anything about this issue online. The tire mechanics said they hadn't seen anything like it, which was why they didn't suspect this as the culprit of the vibration for so long. I was previously considering the Continental MC6's for our Volvo S60 but decided against it since they are manufactured in the same location. On another note, I ended up replacing them with a set of the new Bridgestone RE004's (had no idea they existed until I visited my local Bridgestone distributor) and would like to leave a review of those as well, but they are not on the site yet and I've yet to receive an email response for the past 3 months now after using both 'suggest a tire' and 'contact tire reviews' (also had an inquiry about the Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2 tires which ended up on the aforementioned Volvo S60, as their tread pattern does not resemble any of the images found online).
Helpful 24 - tire reviewed on January 5, 2021
Peugeot 208 1.6 vti (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 18,000 miles
This tire is very well-balanced in terms of dry/wet performance and also overall comfort. I have used both Michelin PS4 and Primacy 4 tires in my car, so i could confidently say the UC6 outperforms the Primacy 4 in almost all aspects except for tire wear which i couldn't comment for now as it still has about 5mm thread depth left after 30k KM. (Primacy 4 lasted for 42k KM). In term of tire performance, for comparison purposes I set PS4 as the benchmark (100%), i would rate UC6 in relative to PS4 as following:- Dry - 85/100 Wet - 80/100 Handling - 80/100 However, this tire has a relatively softer side wall so it's definitely more comfortable and the noise level is lower compared to PS4. Taking into consideration of UC6 is not a high performance tire, so generally im happy with this UC6 and it's much cheaper than the Michelins, definitely recommended!
Helpful 70 - tire reviewed on September 2, 2020
Given 91% while driving a Volvo S40 2.4i 2007 (205/55 R16 H) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
This tire were fitted to replace an aging eco tires that were fitted to the car at purchase. Right away after fitment from the tire shop, the comfort and feedback were felt immediately despite being filled with lower pressure than I use usually (220 kPa vs 250 kPa as recommended for highway driving by manufacturer). Dry grip is more than satisfying but its wet grip that impresses more, standing water and torrential rain is easily navigated at decent speed. Wet braking is even more so impressive as there's no drama to the braking. While the tires were relatively softer, the noise level is quite audible but not disruptive or distracting and is more than adequate given its wet grip. The one department that could do better is wear levels as it is a little more than halfway worn after 2 years and under 30k miles covered. Still, its an impressive in my view for its price.
Helpful 41 - tire reviewed on August 7, 2020
Given 99% while driving a Toyota Corolla Altis (205/65 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
These are superb tires. They're super grippy whether its raining or dry. Hydroplaning is unknown to these tires. They grip and brakes really well. They are truly top of the line, and like a diamond in gems. Moreover they're soft, but they give much better handling/control wgen compared with many good hard tires. Will buy again any day.
Helpful 38 - tire reviewed on August 6, 2020
Given 84% while driving a Mercedes Benz GLC220d (245/45 R19 W) on mostly motorways for 10,000 average miles
Great all rounder, good grip and good comfort. Will drive more and update if I’ll buy again
Helpful 43 - tire reviewed on July 22, 2020