Menu

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

The Continental WinterContact TS 860 S is a Ultra High Performance Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.1
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
85%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
87%
Handling
88%
Wear
91%
Comfort
92%
Buy again
81%
Snow Grip
90%
Ice Grip
81%
12 Reviews
86% Average
64,100 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 4th)
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

Winter Premium
BETA
8.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Value
95.1
0.42x / 2 tests
Snow
93.3
1.5x / 2 tests
Comfort
78.4
0.32x / 1 test
Wet
70.8
1.93x / 3 tests
Dry
62.7
1.13x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
78.9
3 tests
Handling
73.5
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 2
Period: 2019 - 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 12
Avg Rating: 86.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
The Best Winter Tires for 2020 Tire Reviews 2020 205/55 R16 3/19 0 metrics
2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2019 255/35 R19 4/12 10 metrics
2
Tests
4th
Average
3rd
Best
4th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
3rd/19
The Continental WinterContact TS860S is a sporty winter tire with precise steering and high levels of grip in the dry.
Expensive to buy, extended wet braking.
Sporty dry handling, precise steering, good feedback, low rolling resistance.
Slightly long wet braking, average comfort, expensive.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/60 R 16 96 H XL C C 72
205/60 R 16 96 H XL C C 72
17 inch
215/45 R 17 91 H XL C B 72
20 inch
255/45 R 20 105 V XL C B 73
245/35 R 20 95 W XL C C 72
245/35 R 20 95 V XL D C 72
275/55 R 20 117 V XL B C 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Continental WinterContact TS 860 S >>

Questions and Answers for the Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

Ask a question
October 31, 2018

Would the new Continental WinterContact 860 S in 245/40/R19 be suitable for a Tesla Model S with a standard tire size of 245/45/R19? Is the new S tire as suitable as an all seasons tire as its predecessor 860?

The TS860S moves the balance of performance back towards dry even more, so in theory it's probably as good an "all season" as a winter tire gets but it will still be at a big dry braking disadvantage in the summer. As for changing the tire size, you'll have to see what other Tesla owners are doing as that's not something I can give advice on.
November 3, 2018

Love the winter tire review and found it very informative. My wife runs a e93 335i (225/35/19, 255/30/19) and I’d like to switch to the Conti ts860s for winter. My question is, do these come in runflats? I like the ability for her to be not stranded should there be an issue, and it’s happened a few times, hence why I’ve continued with runflats on her car. Alternatively, would you suggest some other run flat for London winter?

The good news is the TS860 S is offered in runflat in certain sizes, you would have to check with Continental or your tire retailer to see if you can get RFT versions for both your front and rear sizes!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 11 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Continental WinterContact TS 860 S very highly, praising its strong wet and dry grip in cold conditions, confident snow/ice performance, progressive handling, and comfort, often comparing it favorably to summer-tire feel. A minority noted slower scrub-in, higher noise, some wet/lateral grip limitations, and one outlier issue with circumference mismatch on staggered RWD setups. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with excellent all-round winter performance.

Strengths
  • Wet grip
  • Dry grip
  • Snow and ice traction
  • Progressive/forgiving handling
  • Comfort/ride
  • Low wear/durability
Areas for Improvement
  • Takes time to scrub in
  • Higher noise than average
  • Lateral grip limitations in wet

Top 3 Continental WinterContact TS 860 S Reviews

Given 58% while driving a Kia Motors Stinger 2.0 RWD (225/40 R19) on mostly motorways for 5,000 spirited miles
Warning! Do not buy the standard tires if you have a staggered setup and RWD. Only OEM spec (star, MO, GO, etc).

I had a combination of 225/40R19 front with 255/35R19 on the rear. This is the standard for my car. And yet, on dry roads, in a straight line, the TC would cut power under acceleration.

After measuring the circumference of fronts and rears I found a difference of more than 2% in circumference between fronts and rears. This means a difference of 3km/h between front and rear wheels at highway speed. And under acceleration the rears would slip just enough to trigger TC.

Continental did not care about this. They said it’s normal to have a tolerance between -2% and +1% in circumference in the normal tires. They only limit these differences for OEM tires.

If you have a RWD and care about your life, don’t buy these.
October 24, 2024
Given 91% while driving a BMW 340 m sport (245/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
As a fan of winter tires and a self confessed "Michelin fanboy" these are the best winter tires I've ever used. Mostly because snow and ice are quite rare even in Scotland. So it's wet and dry performance in cold conditions that matter most.
These tires just hang on to the road and give significantly more grip than you can reasonably expect for the conditions. Breakaway is progressive and not just controllable but fun and exploitable.
Due to unforseen circumstances (and because I have a second car) I've ended up using these throughout the summer. Grip levels reduce as expected in high temperatures but the progression and fun remain.
I'm definitely staying loyal to Continental in winter now. Long to see what their new winter tires can do
August 26, 2023
Given 86% while driving a Mercedes Benz E Class Estate (275/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Fitted to a 2017 E Class Mercedes estate. Really impressed with the wet / dry weather performance at low temperatures. Handles very similar to a summer tire and last season were left on until late spring. This is the second season running them and they have hardly worn at all. My car has different tire sizes front and rear so I was limited on choice for manufactures that can provide for both fitments. They were expensive but I have no regrets as they have proven faultless in all conditions and do not go off in warmer conditions like previous winter tires I have had on other vehicles. Highly recommended if you can find them as they have now been superseded by other models.
February 13, 2023

How would you rate the Continental WinterContact TS 860 S?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Continental WinterContact TS 860 S Reviews

Given 77% while driving a BMW 320D (225/40 R19) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
First and foremost if you buy these they can take an age to scrub in. Longer in the wet but quicker in the dry. Mine took 200 miles before grip improved. A previous reviewer commenter on grip failing in certain areas and that’s correct. Lateral grip is not their strong suit. In the wet, even accidental excitement in a corner can send you off track a little. Easy to correct with safety features such as traction control activated. It’s a progressive tire otherwise with good feedback. You can tell when they are losing grip. The noise is above average but thankfully vibration is not too bad. Dry grip impressive. Not immune to aqua planing by any means but pretty good if driving steady. In conclusion, a good all round tire, fails in some areas, excels in others, and not a sporty performance tire by any stretch of the imagination. Probably won’t outdo a dedicated winter tire but for occasional snow/ice/mud it is more than fine.
October 22, 2022
Given 71% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 5,000 spirited miles
They are not for my rainy city... 90% of driving takes place in the city. The tires look great, good road feedback, they wear normally, but they slipped where none of my previous tires did (Dunlop, Michelin, Cont 860). Maybe that tire is for slightly heavier cars... I drove it for two (not really) winters.
August 17, 2022
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 84% while driving a Opel Astra H OPC (235/45 R18 V) on mostly motorways for 100 spirited miles
Basically, my review is about the brand-new Continetal WinterContact TS 860 S vs old TS 850 P with less than 3mm of tread depth remaining. I felt no need to replace them earlier as we have not had much snow (i.e. no snaw at all) up until now. Today, with the snow depth measuring some 10 to 15 centimetres, I found it next to impossible to drive out of my apartment bloc to a high street (relatively well-groomed). I my put snow chains on, which gave me confidence in deep snow but were a nuisance on the more or less clean road. In short, the TS 860 S is a real upgraded version of its predecessor. First, it is no-way as wobbly as TS 850 P used to be. When your drive a hot hatch brandishing 280 horse powers and then have to change from summer to winter tires, you notice immediately that a part of those powers is suddenly gone at the expense of some added comfort. The TS 860 S is closer to a summer tire. For me it is a much better trade-off (compared to 850 P) as far as its ability to navigate wintery roads is concerned. The brand-new TS 860 S coped decently with snow, sleet and even occasional ice, let alone clean black tarmac. Quite importantly, it was manageable on ice (just drop you speed a bit to regain control). Surprisingly, I could not notice any benefits of its much-advertised low rolling resistance. Subjectively, the same route (about 90km) has taken me as much fuel as when I had my good old Continental TS 850 Ps. To be consistent with winter tire test results, I will assume that my driving style has become sportier 😊. Otherwise, I am happy. Not least because I did not need snow chains to park my car at my apartment. We are expected to have a week of the real, pre-climate-change, winter! Safe winter motoring to all!
January 15, 2021
Given 100% while driving a Skoda Rapid TSI (185/60 R15) on mostly motorways for 10,000 easy going miles
What a tire, extremely satisfied, mainly Iam driving on motorways 70% and 30% in the city. Till now I have done approx 9-11k Km.
Excellent handling on wet, dry or snow conditions, never worried or felt a fear, I am so comfortable that I really drove the same way like I have a summer tire.
Exceptional performance on snow, usually going for a week at alps for skiing and have to say they shine, exceptional grip control and very good road feedback, you totally know when you can push more or you are pushing too much.
Few times I had to break hard on highways I felt comfortable and confident.
No wear issues till now.
Deff would buy it again and I would recommend it 100%

Please note, generally Iam an easy going driver with gentle foot.
November 30, 2019
Given 90% while driving a BMW M5 (295/30 R20 W) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Tremendous winter tire. Been driving in deep snow, ice, and they just grip for days.
February 14, 2019
Given 99% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
The best winter tire money can buy
December 17, 2018
Given 95% while driving a BMW M2 (275/35 R19 V) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
TS 860 S is an amazing performance winter tire. I went a size bigger than OEM with 255/275 35 19 on my manual BMW M2. So far the best winter tire I ever had. On dry roads there is not much difference between these and summers. Feedback is great, I had TS850P on my previous car and they were a bit squishy during cornering, but TS860 S have stiffer sidewalls and you can feel it. Wet grip is also great, didn't test them on snow yet. Great plus is comfort, as the rubber is softer it absorbs more bumps and overall ride is more comfortable without sacrificing performance, a win-win in my books. Would defo by again and highly recommend.
December 13, 2018
Given 100% while driving a BMW 330d (235/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Outstanding winter tire in every area
September 12, 2018
Rate the Continental WinterContact TS 860 S