Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun Reviews - Page 3

Given 57% while driving a Fiat Bravo (225/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
Everything was OK at first but after 18 months / 30.000 km, the tires lost their softness and circularity. They got hard like a stone and made vibration since they are not circular anymore. Shame !!!
Helpful 27 - tire reviewed on August 11, 2018
Given 76% while driving a Audi A3 Sedan (8V) 1.4 TFSI (235/40 R18 W) on mostly town for 35 average miles
Positives: Handling, high comfort against pot holes, low rolling resistance, price
Negatives: High noise level even in slow speeds, bumpy on high speeds
I do not recommend unless you have tight budget
A3 Sedan (8V) 1.0 TFSI
Helpful 26 - tire reviewed on August 4, 2018
Given 77% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer EX 2.0 MIVEC (MAN) (205/60 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 0 miles
The big problem is the original dunlop 2050 nosiy harsh but give stability and nice grip when replaced with falken , first of all falken price is really affordable , car is mush smoother and quite , wet grip is acceptable but not perfect its not sporty it goes for quiet ride and comfort on corners not that mush confident comparing with dunlop but over all nice tire , braking is okay even the traction is B , not sure it will last or no but its nice value for money
Helpful 33 - tire reviewed on June 5, 2018
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 57% while driving a Suzuki swift sport (195/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 11,000 spirited miles
I can't be too hard on these tires as they were fitted to a Suzuki Swift Sport Mk1 and kept me on the road, with no skids or excessive wheel spin. And their wet grip is fine too.
However, once I succeeded them with Goodyear Eagle F1 DS G3 (same 195/45/R17 size), they were like chalk and cheese.
The Falkens, in comparison, are brutally hard with no real 'feel' at the steering wheel, just essentially lumps of rock hard mass. Whilst the car itself does have very firm, sport suspension, the Falkens exasperated this, and to the extreme.
As stated, once I eventually fitted Goodyear Eagle GS D3s to replace them, the difference in ride quality and steering feel, and just an overall better car feel, made the Falkens seem awful in comparison.
So, in summary, a 'safe' tire in terms of wet grip and no scary moments (thankfully), I would not buy again due to the ride quality and being devoid of feel at the steering wheel.
Helpful 33 - tire reviewed on March 13, 2018
Given 61% while driving a Vauxhall Insignia CDTI SRI 160 (245/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
OK tires, not the best, not the worst. Wet grip seems to deteriorate exponentially the more they wear down.
I'm shocked at only getting 15,000 miles from a front set on a Vauxhall Insignia. I'm by no means an "aggressive" driver so this wear rate seems unacceptably poor. For that reason I won't be buying these again.
Helpful 31 - tire reviewed on January 3, 2018
Given 76% while driving a Skoda Fabia vRS (205/40 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Fitted these to my Fabia vRS on the front. Got them for a very good price at my local tire fitter. Needed something which could put the power down and also take a corner without understeering into a kerb like a lot of the cheaper brands.
They grip very well in the dry and are progressive with good feedback. Wet grip is the most important for the UK especially over winter. They are impressive to say the least. Whilst the grip isnt as good as the much more expensive Goodyear eagle f1, its still very reassuring. The limits become obvious when you start to push on power whilst taking roundabouts in the wet but its easy to regain control by just easing off slightly. When the tires are starting to give you get a small amount of feedback then they just start washing out quickly after that. Only real negative is there is no rim protection at all, which on 17" wheels with low profile tires means any sort of kerb or obstacle must be carefully avoided.
Helpful 21 - tire reviewed on December 18, 2017
Given 81% while driving a Jaguar s type 2.5 (235/50 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
noise is less than Pirelli for sure..driving for 2000 km. No need to give much money..
Helpful 37 - tire reviewed on December 16, 2017
Fiat (195/60 R15 H) on mostly country roads for 22,000 average miles
Good tires, both dry and wet, I would say good length, I changed them to 22,000 km because the bumpy convergence made them to consume on the inside. To recommend.
Helpful 28 - tire reviewed on November 7, 2017
Given 100% while driving a Volkswagen Golf (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 0 miles
Excelent grip. It change the car
Helpful 35 - tire reviewed on August 29, 2017
Given 77% while driving a Mercedes Benz C180 (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 7,500 easy going miles
Bought these tires to replace my Nokian Line (see my review in the Nokian Line page) on my Mercedes C180. I had to change from the Nokian because there is no more dealership in my country, Singapore. Else, I would have just carry on with the Nokian.

I bought these tires after seeing the good reviews on here as well as the reasonable price offered by local dealers. In Singapore, it is summer all year with plenty of rain. After putting about 12000km on these tires on mainly town driving, I find that it has excellent dry grip and has low rolling resistence (good for people who likes to take pedal off and glide their cars). However, the wet grip is not exactly convincing. On wet smooth surface, such as metal drain covers or smooth cement floors used in carparks, these tires got ZERO grip. Once you step on the brakes on such surface, the car's ABS kicks in and the car skids forward. You can only pray that it stops.

On normal wet surface, most time the grip is pretty good. But there was an instance when i jammed my brake (and i usually keep my distance), my car was initially braking ok but suddenly, it seem to lose grip and started skidding forward. The final moments before the car stopped i thought i was going to collide with the car in front. So for me these tires are simply too unconvincing. It doesnt give me the feeling that i will be entirely safe on wet surface and i will not buy these tires again.
Helpful 84 - tire reviewed on August 16, 2017
BMW (265/35 R18) on mostly motorways for 9,000 spirited miles
A pretty standard tire but shocked at the wear rate on these.
Nothing to complain about and nothing outstanding about them either did the job.
These are in no way a value option. Fitted these all round to my e39 530D in October 2015 before the MOT. By the beginning of March the rears were down to were 3mm after only 8k. The driving was mostly spirited motorway.

Was shocked when it was pointed out to me during a service.

Got rid of the rears a month later and didn't want to keep the fronts. Replaced with nexen nfera su1 all around which are much better tires and even known to be soft but still did 13k on the rears.
Helpful 24 - tire reviewed on July 4, 2017
Given 69% while driving a Mitsubishi Proton Saga FLX (185/55 R15) on mostly town for 10,000 easy going miles
Very noisy tire...
Helpful 33 - tire reviewed on June 20, 2017