Riken UHP
WatchThe Riken UHP is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
17
Reviews
72%
Average
99,600
miles driven
2
Tests (avg: 42nd)
All Tests
View Test Results2
Tests
42nd
Average
38th
Best
45th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout
45th/52
225/40 R18 • 2025
2023 Summer Tire Market Overview
38th/48
225/45 R18 • 2023
Alternative Tires
9.1/10
8.5/10
7.8/10
7.7/10
6.6/10
86% 4 reviews
Questions and Answers for the Riken UHP
Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Riken UHP. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Review Summary
Based on 15 user reviews
Most drivers find the Riken UHP offers strong dry grip, solid wet traction for the price, and a comfortable, relatively quiet ride, making it a high-value choice. Higher-scoring reviews frequently praise stability and confidence in both wet and dry conditions, with some noting decent wear. A minority of users report inconsistent wet grip-especially when worn or at the limit-and a few mention weak sidewalls on pothole-heavy roads.
Strengths
- Dry grip
- Wet grip for the price
- Value/price
- Handling stability
- Comfort/low noise
Areas for Improvement
- Inconsistent wet grip when worn or at the limit
Top 3 Riken UHP Reviews
Given 47%
while driving a
BMW 330i
(225/45 R18)
on mostly town
for 2,000 easy going miles
Given 59%
while driving a
Lexus GS450h
(245/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 6,000 average miles
When I purchased my Lexus GS450H it came with rear only Riken UHPs and in the dry with roughly 4mm remaining tread very grippy hard to destabilise the car without turning off TCS.
Performed well in wet conditions with essential tread levels BUT, be careful on wet conditions and especially when at legal limit tread levels the car can destabilise without too much effort. Otherwise quite solid.
I got around 6000 miles from around 4mm when I got the car so 12000 miles estimated when new.
Performed well in wet conditions with essential tread levels BUT, be careful on wet conditions and especially when at legal limit tread levels the car can destabilise without too much effort. Otherwise quite solid.
I got around 6000 miles from around 4mm when I got the car so 12000 miles estimated when new.
Given 63%
while driving a
Ford Fiesta Zetec S
(205/40 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 2,000 spirited miles
The tires have a very soft sidewall, even with my low 40 profile tire, this meant that they are comfterable and pretty good in the dry and wet. I had only had budgets or random tires on my car before these and so when I went on a country road drive the front end felt much better (well duuhh). For the money these have decent performance but there is a major downside to these tires... If you hit a pothole these tires will just go, I went through both of my fronts in about 2 months doing a lot of town driving. For this reason I dont' recommend these tires if you live in an area with bad road (ie the entire of the UK)
Latest Riken UHP Reviews
Initial Impressions Review
Given 71%
while driving a
Honda Civic 1.8
(225/45 R17)
on
for 20,000 miles
Despite the unusual first-season slipperiness, the Riken UHP develops into a reliable and capable tire. I was satisfied with its performance, and in terms of price-to-value, it’s absolutely worth it.
Given 55%
while driving a
Skoda Yeti
(225/55 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 0 average miles
Those tires were on the car when I bought it. There is some tread left, but I decided to get all seasons (Michelin CC3). They are good on dry road, but I cant trust them on wet...
Given 86%
while driving a
Audi quattro
(225/55 R18)
on mostly country roads
for 25,000 average miles
Excellent tire made by Michelin price is excellent I put these on my Audi Coupe S2 tires lasted well excellent grip wet or dry a little noisy but still ok the car is 230 bop 4x4 comfort is good although sport suspension well recommend tire definitely but again
Given 87%
while driving a
Vauxhall Astra SRi
(225/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 1,000 spirited miles
Purchased these tires 2 months ago as replacement for hankook Ventus. I’ve tried my best to push them to let go in wet and dry conditions and have never lost grip enough to feel in any way out of complete control. Sport mode with driver aids disabled can barely elicit wheelspin before the grip asserts itself and launches the car very satisfactorily. Quiet comfortable ride. Best value tires I’ve had in years £250 fully fitted on four corners with nitrogen inflation. Will definitely be buying again in future. Premium tire performance at budget tire price. Get some on your motor and rag them if you can or dare to. Because despite my best efforts I cannot find any real fault. Can’t speak for long term wear but they still look off the rack pristine after 1000+ miles.
Given 90%
while driving a
BMW 320
(255/35 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 9,000 average miles
Brought these for me rear wheels and I really think they are brilliant. I have now done 9k miles and still have about 4.5mm tread.
I have driven on dry and torrential weather and have never spun, this is a really underrated tire and I will be buying again.
Given 76%
while driving a
Fiat Bravo
(225/50 R17 W)
on mostly town
for 0 average miles
That's it F/P
Given 85%
while driving a
Audi 1.8T Quattro
(225/40 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 600 spirited miles
Tire is great in wet or dry and comfortable BUT they have a very weak side wall. I have replaced 2 inside 1000 miles due to side wall damage hitting a pothole and now a 3rd has a bulge after 600 miles. I will not buy them again for British roads
Given 87%
while driving a
BMW E38 7 Series
(225/45 R18 W)
on a combination of roads
for 1,500 average miles
Riken UHP-on my heavy Bmw E38 this tires performs very well,good grip wet and dry.I'm done it one trip from Bristol to London in a heavy rain,BRILLIANT!I've been very confident with this tires,realy recommended.Cheap,good performance,good handling,low noise
Given 78%
while driving a
Volkswagen Scirocco 2.0 TSI 201
(235/40 R18 W)
on a combination of roads
for 1,000 spirited miles
Bought these tires at £75 each fitted to replace Pirelli P Zero tires. In the dry they are about the same as the Pirellis and in the wet I have found them to be slightly better. However, these tires seem quite hard which takes away some of the road feedback and comfort, although still not far off the Pirellis. I haven't had them for long enough to test wear or long term degradation. Initial impressions are very good and they are overall close to premium tires in terms of performance but at a much cheaper price.
Given 33%
while driving a
Volvo s60 D5 (163)
(235/40 R18 W)
on mostly town
for 1,500 average miles
The worst tires I have been used in my life. I have tried this brand after my old Continental tires. Pricing of this tires were very close to Petlas, Kumho and Falken but the vehicle doesn't stop while braking, even at low speeds. I made a big mistake to choose this new brand. Also handling is so weak too. I have to lower my speed more down as usual before cornering. Noise level is same as my old tires. For safety on road, be aware to use this brand. Lastly, I will never buy it again.
Given 79%
while driving a
Audi A3 2.0 TDI 140
(225/45 R17 W)
on mostly town
for 5,000 average miles
Fine for a daily town car, used on motorway a handful of times over the past 3000 miles and they have been fine. Wet is ok, not amazing but a cheap tire so to be expected. Will buy again though as they are half the price of Avon's and seemed just as good.
Given 44%
while driving a
Renault Megane Sports Tourer
(225/40 R18 W)
on a combination of roads
for 2,000 spirited miles
Tires are definitely a cheap end of the market, on the wet there is no way to tell when they will give up. Unpredictable in the wet. In the dry they are ok, but again they give up very quickly and suddenly. For the price difference of 20£ per tire between them and reasonable brand I don't recommend these. Mine were made in Serbia 03/2019.