Menu

Riken UHP

The Riken UHP is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

3.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
81%
Wet Grip
67%
Road Feedback
69%
Handling
72%
Wear
73%
Comfort
74%
Buy again
65%
17 Reviews
72% Average
99,600 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 42nd)
Riken Riken UHP

Riken Riken UHP

Summer Economy
BETA
3.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Dry
66.4
1.8x / 2 tests
Wet
65.1
2x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
65.7
4 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 1
Period: 2023 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 17
Avg Rating: 71.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.26
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 45/52 2 metrics
2023 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 38/48 2 metrics
2
Tests
42nd
Average
38th
Best
45th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
45th/52
38th/48

Questions and Answers for the Riken UHP

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Riken UHP. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 15 user reviews

Most drivers find the Riken UHP offers strong dry grip, solid wet traction for the price, and a comfortable, relatively quiet ride, making it a high-value choice. Higher-scoring reviews frequently praise stability and confidence in both wet and dry conditions, with some noting decent wear. A minority of users report inconsistent wet grip-especially when worn or at the limit-and a few mention weak sidewalls on pothole-heavy roads.

Strengths
  • Dry grip
  • Wet grip for the price
  • Value/price
  • Handling stability
  • Comfort/low noise
Areas for Improvement
  • Inconsistent wet grip when worn or at the limit

Top 3 Riken UHP Reviews

Given 47% while driving a BMW 330i (225/45 R18) on mostly town for 2,000 easy going miles
Total disaster. Lowest quality of material
June 25, 2025
Given 59% while driving a Lexus GS450h (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
When I purchased my Lexus GS450H it came with rear only Riken UHPs and in the dry with roughly 4mm remaining tread very grippy hard to destabilise the car without turning off TCS.
Performed well in wet conditions with essential tread levels BUT, be careful on wet conditions and especially when at legal limit tread levels the car can destabilise without too much effort. Otherwise quite solid.

I got around 6000 miles from around 4mm when I got the car so 12000 miles estimated when new.
December 6, 2024
Given 63% while driving a Ford Fiesta Zetec S (205/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
The tires have a very soft sidewall, even with my low 40 profile tire, this meant that they are comfterable and pretty good in the dry and wet. I had only had budgets or random tires on my car before these and so when I went on a country road drive the front end felt much better (well duuhh). For the money these have decent performance but there is a major downside to these tires... If you hit a pothole these tires will just go, I went through both of my fronts in about 2 months doing a lot of town driving. For this reason I dont' recommend these tires if you live in an area with bad road (ie the entire of the UK)
November 22, 2023

How would you rate the Riken UHP?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Riken UHP Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 71% while driving a Honda Civic 1.8 (225/45 R17) on for 20,000 miles
Despite the unusual first-season slipperiness, the Riken UHP develops into a reliable and capable tire. I was satisfied with its performance, and in terms of price-to-value, it’s absolutely worth it.
January 14, 2026
Given 55% while driving a Skoda Yeti (225/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Those tires were on the car when I bought it. There is some tread left, but I decided to get all seasons (Michelin CC3). They are good on dry road, but I cant trust them on wet...
November 11, 2025
Given 86% while driving a Audi quattro (225/55 R18) on mostly country roads for 25,000 average miles
Excellent tire made by Michelin price is excellent I put these on my Audi Coupe S2 tires lasted well excellent grip wet or dry a little noisy but still ok the car is 230 bop 4x4 comfort is good although sport suspension well recommend tire definitely but again
August 21, 2022
Given 87% while driving a Vauxhall Astra SRi (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Purchased these tires 2 months ago as replacement for hankook Ventus. I’ve tried my best to push them to let go in wet and dry conditions and have never lost grip enough to feel in any way out of complete control. Sport mode with driver aids disabled can barely elicit wheelspin before the grip asserts itself and launches the car very satisfactorily. Quiet comfortable ride. Best value tires I’ve had in years £250 fully fitted on four corners with nitrogen inflation. Will definitely be buying again in future. Premium tire performance at budget tire price. Get some on your motor and rag them if you can or dare to. Because despite my best efforts I cannot find any real fault. Can’t speak for long term wear but they still look off the rack pristine after 1000+ miles.
March 16, 2022
Given 90% while driving a BMW 320 (255/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 9,000 average miles
Brought these for me rear wheels and I really think they are brilliant. I have now done 9k miles and still have about 4.5mm tread. I have driven on dry and torrential weather and have never spun, this is a really underrated tire and I will be buying again.
February 26, 2022
Given 76% while driving a Fiat Bravo (225/50 R17 W) on mostly town for 0 average miles
That's it F/P
May 25, 2020
Given 85% while driving a Audi 1.8T Quattro (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 600 spirited miles
Tire is great in wet or dry and comfortable BUT they have a very weak side wall. I have replaced 2 inside 1000 miles due to side wall damage hitting a pothole and now a 3rd has a bulge after 600 miles. I will not buy them again for British roads
March 23, 2020
Given 87% while driving a BMW E38 7 Series (225/45 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Riken UHP-on my heavy Bmw E38 this tires performs very well,good grip wet and dry.I'm done it one trip from Bristol to London in a heavy rain,BRILLIANT!I've been very confident with this tires,realy recommended.Cheap,good performance,good handling,low noise
December 15, 2019
Given 78% while driving a Volkswagen Scirocco 2.0 TSI 201 (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Bought these tires at £75 each fitted to replace Pirelli P Zero tires. In the dry they are about the same as the Pirellis and in the wet I have found them to be slightly better. However, these tires seem quite hard which takes away some of the road feedback and comfort, although still not far off the Pirellis. I haven't had them for long enough to test wear or long term degradation. Initial impressions are very good and they are overall close to premium tires in terms of performance but at a much cheaper price.
November 18, 2019
Given 33% while driving a Volvo s60 D5 (163) (235/40 R18 W) on mostly town for 1,500 average miles
The worst tires I have been used in my life. I have tried this brand after my old Continental tires. Pricing of this tires were very close to Petlas, Kumho and Falken but the vehicle doesn't stop while braking, even at low speeds. I made a big mistake to choose this new brand. Also handling is so weak too. I have to lower my speed more down as usual before cornering. Noise level is same as my old tires. For safety on road, be aware to use this brand. Lastly, I will never buy it again.
June 9, 2019
Given 79% while driving a Audi A3 2.0 TDI 140 (225/45 R17 W) on mostly town for 5,000 average miles
Fine for a daily town car, used on motorway a handful of times over the past 3000 miles and they have been fine. Wet is ok, not amazing but a cheap tire so to be expected. Will buy again though as they are half the price of Avon's and seemed just as good.
May 30, 2019
Given 44% while driving a Renault Megane Sports Tourer (225/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Tires are definitely a cheap end of the market, on the wet there is no way to tell when they will give up. Unpredictable in the wet. In the dry they are ok, but again they give up very quickly and suddenly. For the price difference of 20£ per tire between them and reasonable brand I don't recommend these. Mine were made in Serbia 03/2019.
May 25, 2019
Rate the Riken UHP