RoadX RXMOTION U11

The RoadX RXMOTION U11 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tire review data from 32 tire reviews averaging 49% over 198,210 miles driven, and 1 tests with an average result of 6th.

Dry Grip 62%
Wet Grip 37%
Road Feedback 46%
Handling 41%
Wear 74%
Comfort 53%
Buy again 32%

First On MarketDecember 2019
Wheel Size15 - 22"
Width185 - 325mm
Profile30 - 55
Rolling ResistanceB - D
Wet GripC - C
Noise (dB)70 - 73
Winter RatingNot Winter Rated

The RXMOTION U11 is ranked 139th of 147 Summer Ultra High Performance tires.

Tests Included

1

Best Result

6th

Worst Result

6th

Average Result

6th

Latest Tire Test Results

2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tires for Asia Test
6th of 6 tires
  • RoadX RXMotion U11 finished last, with notable weaknesses in wet performance. The tire needed 37.7m to stop in wet conditions and posted the slowest wet handling lap at 89.26s. Its only real strength was dry handling, where it performed better than expected for a budget option. The tire's low price point reflects its position as an economy option with significant performance compromises.
View Full Test >>

2024 Tire Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the RoadX RXMOTION U11. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top 3 RoadX RXMOTION U11 Reviews

Given 61% while driving a BMW 123d (245/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 1,500 spirited miles
For the price they are good summer tires, traction control light wasn't kicking in unless really pushing round bends, In the wet driving normally is fine but on roundabouts it felt far too easy to slide out, perfect if you are expecting it, again considering its a brand I've never heard of and the price I wasn't expecting them to be as good as the Goodyear asymmetric 5s I had on before, they were almost as good in dry but half as good in wet comparison
Helpful 109 - tire reviewed on November 2, 2021
Given 67% while driving a BMW X5 (315/35 R20) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
I put these on my x5 as a much cheaper option to the pirelli’s they replaced…half to price for 275/315 offsets. Would I put them on my m4? Probably not, but for any sport suv they are just fine. To expect these to perform the same as something twice the price is unrealistic. They doing the job I need them for and they look great. I’m not racing my x5 but they honestly don’t feel bad at higher speeds. I’d consider them again.
Helpful 43 - tire reviewed on August 2, 2023
Given 33% while driving a Audi TT MK2 TFSI (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Utter garbage...... average dry grip but absolutely horrific wet/damp road grip to a point of being dangerous.... there doesn't appear to be a limit to when they'll let go, it's like both fronts are flat and just want to go straight on. Spins the front wheel in 3rd gear on brisk acceleration. The car came with these on and I can see why the independent garage pit them on... theyre cheap! Avoid like the plague
Helpful 79 - tire reviewed on November 16, 2021
Have you driven on the RoadX RXMOTION U11 tire?

Have YOU got experience with the RoadX RXMOTION U11? Help millions of other tire buyers

Review your RoadX RXMOTION U11 >

Latest RoadX RXMOTION U11 Reviews

Given 69% while driving a Peugeot e208 (205/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
I’ve had these on my Peugeot E-208 for 4 months and they have been amazing. I drive it quite hard and have covered 10k in this time mostly on windy back roads around the Cotswolds. Although I am now down to no tread on the front, a lot of this can be out to the electric FWD car and heavy right foot. On the whole these tires have been brilliant, surprisingly amazing dry handling, brilliant grip off the line and they have really helped control any understeer the 1.6 Ton FWD 208 would otherwise have! They’re still good in the wet but you can’t push them quite as hard as you would a PS4 shall we say. All round really impressed and would highly recommend to anyone after a really good budget tire!
Helpful 11 - tire reviewed on July 30, 2024
Given 20% while driving a Volvo V40, 2013 D2 (225/45 R17) on for 0 miles
Do not buy these tires please !!
Dangerous tires, terrible grip in the wet. Understeer at 30kph in the wet on roundabouts.
Helpful 14 - tire reviewed on July 20, 2024
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 41% while driving a Mercedes Benz (225/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 20,000 average miles
These tires are built for one thing and one thing alone, longevity. At 20,000 miles, the tread was 4.5mm-5.2mm and they clearly had life left in them. They are marketed as a tire that can reach 60,000 miles but that is where the praise stops. The compound is hard. As such, spirited driving is not their forte. The traction light and skid noises could draw attention. The dry grip is average. In the wet they were below average. Forget heavy cornering and handling. Simply put, they cannot handle excitement. Wet braking was terrible. There is a reason these are cheap and cheerful. The car just felt broken and never drove properly. Similar to a previous detailed BMW review on here for these tires. If you are looking for a town/city hard waring tire though, then these could be for you. However, safety is not at the forefront so I could not recommend these on a motorway. They were replaced with Yokohama and the difference is night and day. As these Road-X tires are quite hard, the fuel saving was okay but not spectacular. I would rather face a very minor fuel penalty with more appropriate and safer tires than use these again.
Helpful 12 - tire reviewed on May 9, 2024
Given 47% while driving a Vauxhall Insignia CDTI SRI 130 (245/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Fine at normal speeds in the dry. Absolutely shockingly poor grip in wet or cold conditions. They spun up in 1st, 2nd and 3rd in the winter. One of the worst tires in the wet I've ever used. They wear fairly slowly. Replaced with Firestone Firehawk that grip exceptionally in the wet. I wouldn't reccomend them to anyone sadly.
Helpful 12 - tire reviewed on April 22, 2024
Given 71% while driving a BMW 218d Active Tourer (315/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 miles
Fitted on my BMW X5 with staggered 20 inch rims. First impression was horror. But......due to idiot fitters putting 52psi in , and not balanced correctly. Upon putting pressure correct, and getting rebalanced at a proper tire fitters, I don't know any difference from my previous Bridgestone Duellers. Or continentals. No problem whatsoever. Not Star rated for BMW X5 but no probs with transfer box ,so must be consistent on diameter. Look good , cheap, and as my X5 chews rears on inner tread making contis etc uneconomical , I think these harder compound half the price will last a lot longer. Most reviewers would know the difference if these were fitted without their knowing. There aren't many awful budget brands nowadays. Some are even the previous compound and tread / mould of big brands with different make on the mould
Helpful 11 - tire reviewed on April 15, 2024
Given 52% while driving a BMW 330d M Sport (225/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 3,500 average miles
Cannot stand all the reviews on tires like these by people who think they are professional racing drivers. These tire’s do a job, They are a budget tire. Wet grip isn’t amazing but dry grip is more than good enough for normal day to day driving, The only thing that really lets this tire down for me personally with my experience and the reason i am getting rid of them after a few thousand miles is the out edge tread has worn in such a way it now rumbles when driving at motorway speed.
Helpful 15 - tire reviewed on March 20, 2024
Given 28% while driving a SEAT Leon 5f mk3 2014 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Car came with these fitted on the rear with Michelin Primacy on the front. Dry grip seems ok but they are absolutely hopeless in the wet and even worse when the temperature drops.
Turning in to a bend outside my home town that I have taken a thousand times before, they completely failed to have any lateral grip and the car flashed its traction control light and threw its back end round. Wet weather, - yes but not standing water, temperature - probably around 9-10 degrees, "enthusiastically" chucked into the corner - NO. Feel the lack of grip in roundabouts to the point where it feels like I could quite easily flick the backend of a front drive car out with only mild encouragement.
Car is new to me and is more stiffly sprung that previous car (Mondeo) but the tires seem comfortable enough. Given the level of grip, I suspect that these tires will last forever... but not on this vehicle. My other half has H12's (205x55x16) on her golf and they are 100 times better than the U11's.
The U11's however will not be kept long enough for any mid life or end of life report. A pair of Bridgestones are on order and I expect this to make the car much safer to drive.
Helpful 13 - tire reviewed on March 13, 2024
Given 34% while driving a Ford Focus (245/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
These were new on the front of my Ford focus which I bought second hand in January. 16k on tje clock and rear tires still had factory original michelin pilot 4s on . These tires have to be the worst I have ever driven on in over 30 years of motoring. Horrible feedback and the grip is borderline dangerous. Ended up buying 4 goodyear asymmetric 6 tires and the car is like a different car. Full confidence going into a roundabout and don't have to judge if your goi g to slide or take someone out . These tires should be avoided at all costs. Spend more and stay safe.
Helpful 11 - tire reviewed on March 7, 2024
Given 46% while driving a Audi A1 (215/45 R16) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
I would definitely not recommend this tire unless you drive at snail speed in the dry with a car that has little power. The front lets go on cornering in the wet, with little warning. Bought a pre-owned Audi A1 with them on, and was it not for the car's handling capability and safety features and my driving experience and skill, these tires would have had me in trouble
Helpful 17 - tire reviewed on January 17, 2024
Given 46% while driving a Mercedes Benz W205 (225/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 15,000 average miles
These appear to be standard fit by Arnold Clarke on many of their approved used motors. I agree with previous comments on the traction light not kicking in unless pushed hard. Although they are allegedly low rolling resistance, I did not find them too fuel efficient. Dry handling is average. Dry braking is okay. Wet handling is average. Wet braking below average. The rule of 7°C applies for summer tires so they say. However, I found these were poorly gripping at 9°C. Cold conditions are a no for these. By 5mm tread depth, lateral grip was greatly reduced. You could be taking it slow and steady through a mini roundabout however, the car slides to the side. These tires cannot handle excitement but that is not what they are built for. Be prepared for fishtailing if you do excite them. Although, the tread feels like it could last an age, these tires just feel unsafe. There are tall claims of a 60k mile guarantee in their advertising. The more they wore out the worse they became. So bad, at 4mm, I was sick of the wheel spin and poor grip, I replaced them with something more sure footed. A budget brand. If you are on a budget and drive like a saint, these might work for you however, the more usage they see, the worse they get. Anti aqua planing abilities are non-existent. I purchased our car in the summer and they felt fine in the dry months. I thought I would see how things progressed. With weather changes and different conditions these proved they were not up to the job. To conclude, I do not think this is a safe tire and would not buy into the longevity claims.
Helpful 21 - tire reviewed on January 15, 2024
Given 30% while driving a Citroën (215/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
My Diesel Multispace came fitted with a set of these tires when I purchased the car last summer. In dry conditions the grip level is just about acceptable however the steering feel just off center is extemely poor with a strange dragging sensation during cornering they also feel as if the rubber is very hard but my tires had the wrong load rating of 97v they should be 93v for my car. Driving in the wet is a comedy both axles ready to slip out of line with zero warning on wet roundabouts at very low speeds I would class these tires as dangerous in any emergency situation. If the vehicle you are driving has these fitted get them changed now to a safer better tire! I am not using these tires now.
Helpful 21 - tire reviewed on December 30, 2023
Given 24% while driving a Skoda (205/50 R17) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
Terrible terrible tires. In the dry very average but in the wet these tires are very dangerous. Traction control light never off in the wet and as the temperature drops they get worse. They were fitted brand new from Arnold Clark on the car I bought. I have swapped them out after only 2000miles and fitted Goodyear vector 4all season tires and the car is transformed.
Helpful 22 - tire reviewed on October 29, 2023