Opel corsa d 1.3 cdti Tires

On this page you will find the best real world tire reviews from owners of the Opel corsa d 1.3 cdti.

Do you Drive a Opel corsa d 1.3 cdti? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire! After all, who knows what the best tire for a corsa d 1.3 cdti better than the owners?

Review Your Tires >>

Tire Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Kormoran Snowpro (3) 90% 90% 75% 57% 67% 97%
Vredestein Sportrac 5 (98) 88% 85% 84% 83% 86% 84%
Michelin Energy Saver Plus (64) 84% 71% 78% 76% 91% 83%
Michelin CrossClimate (146) 88% 85% 82% 80% 84% 88%
Sava Eskimo HP2 (29) 83% 79% 76% 75% 82% 78%
Continental Premium Contact 5 (117) 87% 83% 76% 77% 58% 78%
Continental Eco Contact 3 (54) 80% 78% 73% 68% 74% 78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 (88) 79% 86% 77% 73% 61% 75%
Continental Eco Contact 5 (89) 80% 68% 68% 68% 74% 68%

Opel corsa d 1.3 cdti Tire Review Highlights

Writing about the Sava Eskimo HP2 given 34% (195-55-16-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 15000 easy going miles
I had used these eskimo hp2 tires four and a half winter season. Now I am using third set of winter tires and 4th set of summer tires all with the same little car so i think i can compare between them properly. Since i was not so experienced driver, i had never knew that how bad a tire could be! Because my previous winter set was the most famous french brand before eskimo hp2.
I would be pleased to say if only Eskimo HP2 have lost grip on the wet after 4 years which were already performed below an average tire before and gripping on dry with EskimoHP2 was not better on the wet, as risky as on the wet road also braking. They are absolutely not comfortable tires i could feel every gravel on the surface.
But not only these, we also match the snow. I went to a place on a dry cold night and it start snowing when i was coming back. On the main street 3 or 4 lanes, with almost an empty traffic luckly, i realize that it was hard to maneuver or braking like as using summer tires. That night... oh that night my fellas.. i had not had an accident.
The main reason about these EskimoHP2, motivates me to write all of these, that night my snow experience was not after 4 years of usage, only a few weeks after i start using them..
tire reviewed on 2024-10-17 09:35:19
Writing about the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 given 95% (185-60-15-T)
Driving on a combination of roads for 1864 easy going miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2020-02-11 02:38:20
Writing about the Michelin Energy Saver Plus given 93% (185-65-15-T)
Driving on mostly motorways for 50 average miles
Treadwear 400, Traction A, Temperature A

One of the most outstanding tires I have ever used.

Dry grip is phenomenal.

Wet grip is adequate for most normal driving conditions.

Road feedback, comfort and handling are on par with the everyday use orientation of the tire.

Wear is simply amazing. The tire loses 0.5mm of tread evey 10.000km.

What is worth commenting is the tire's performance throughout its lifespan. Even after 80.000km, with still 3.2mm of tread left, it performs the same as new. Almost same comfort, same noise, almost same dry and wet braking, and that is probably the best argument why to buy this tire. Reliable, efficient and same performance for around 80.000km. Of course, it could go beyond 100K to reach the legal limit, but what's the point?
tire reviewed on 2019-12-08 00:37:51
Writing about the Continental Eco Contact 5 given 79% (185-65-15-T)
Driving on mostly motorways for 40 spirited miles
These were the originals of the car when I bought it new. They did 63.000km of 90% motorway and 10% city driving before coming down to 3,3mm when I decided to replace them, because they couldn't drain (heavy) rainwater so easily anymore.

I agree with what people say here about these tires, except wet grip and wear. They never seem to have any problem whatsoever with wet conditions. The grip was always there, whether I faced a light drizzle or heavy rainfall or slippery roads, you name it.

Dry grip was very good, never faced a problem there. On feedback, comfort and handling, I think that they perform on par with their league, no surprises there. They do what they are supposed to do.

I left wear for the end because I just don't understand people who want their tires to outlive Highlander. Surely, I wouldn't be happy with my tires if I had to replace them every 15-20.000km, but this is not the case here according to my experience. And afterall, better grip affects longevity. How each of us defines better or worse wear is a matter of semantics.
tire reviewed on 2018-08-10 00:37:48
Writing about the Kormoran Snowpro given 80% (185-65-15-T)
Driving on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
I was very reluctant to use these tires due to the lack of extensive reviews and tests, and the...........well, not the best around, reputation Kormoran have.

I haven't used them in snow or ice, so I cannot comment on these areas. Also, I cannot comment on the Handling section as defined here, because I didn't take them to their limit. In general though, their handling is pretty decent with a progressive feeling as you enter a turn with ever more speed.

They have done approximately 2000km on mostly wet surface and with temperatures averaging 7 degrees C.

Through heavy rainfall, with water at 2-3cm depth and speed at 70km/h, they just cut their way through like a knife on butter. No pulling, no insecurities whatsoever. Very impressed there.

I tried emergency braking from 90km/h to a complete stop on semi-wet surface. ABS did not engage, a praise to the traction of the tires in my opinion.

Their real con in wear I think. They were at 8.6mm on installation and after 2000km the fronts are down to 8.1 and the rears at 8.3mm. So, the rubber forecast isn't favourable.

I consider myself a normal-and-a-bit--spiritied kinda guy. With these things in mind, I found the tires very satisfying on both dry and wet surfaces, although I did not get the "What? Is that all you got?" provocation that PS3 used to give me in the past.......

For normal driving, I'd say there is nothing wrong with them. I also drove them to my car's max speed, 190km/h for 20km. No shaking, no weird instabilities or sounds. All ok here.

On consumption now, I get the same consumption, 4.6lt/100km, that I had with Energy Savers+ (but keep in mind that the latter have 63000km on their clock AND 5.4mm of tread!!!)

To sum up now: according to ME, the tires outperform their label F consumption, E wet, and 69db in both dry and wet surfaces for the average driver. I have no idea about their behaviour on snow and ice. Wear does not seem promising (although these are my first ever set of winter tires and I have no idea how long top ones last). Low price for them (180 euros an installed 4 set).

Would I buy them again? Yes, unless my biases beat the facts. I'll return with more info as I use them more.

tire reviewed on 2017-01-20 10:37:28
Writing about the Michelin Energy Saver Plus given 84% (185-65-15-T)
Driving on a combination of roads for 39000 average miles
As an experienced driver with more than 600.000km on my clock, I think I can quite confidently comment on these tires.

As you can see here, https://youtu.be/WyeAZYL5o6c , after 56.000km I don't know of any, if any, other tire would still have 4.5mm of rubber.

I drive in a combination of motorway and country road (not dirt). They grip well on dry roads, are satisfactory on the wet and fare well on aquaplanning.

Mileage is excellent. I almost always get 4.5lt/100km on mixed journeys and 5.8 in pure city driving conditions with heavy traffic.

Never had any problems whatsoever, they give you a feeling of safety and trust.

All this if you drive like a normal human being.......BUT if you're looking for sport driving.......no, they won't satisfy you. Yes, they will keep you safe under all conditions, but for sporty driving, look elsewhere. They weren't made for this type of driving. There is the PS4 for that.

As for the price, it's only 5 euros per set more expensive than all the rest premium brands, so money is no issue here.

I expect to get at least 70.000km before I decide to replace them (if I wait for the TWI to be reached, they should be around 110.000km!!!!) .

All in all, I highly recommend there tires for normal, everyday and a bit spirited driving under all conditions, except pure winter ones.

Thank you Michelin, I know I can entrust you with the safety of my family.
tire reviewed on 2016-11-19 01:33:35
Writing about the Michelin CrossClimate given 100% (195-55-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 2000 average miles
Replaced set of Falken tires. Immediately noticed how quiet these tires are. Definitely much better grip in wet, especially very wet conditions. Too early to comment on wear, but hoping they wear well which will justify higher price than Falkens.
tire reviewed on 2016-04-18 15:37:40
Writing about the Continental Premium Contact 5 given 73% (195-55-16-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 35000 average miles
this came original from the factory
i am pleased with the grip both in wet and dry of course problematic withy icy roads or snow
the wear is not a problem as i read in the reviews here
down side is i had to change one after i hit a bump toughly while 15k
tire reviewed on 2015-10-24 15:31:43
Writing about the Vredestein Sportrac 5 given 84% (195-65-14-V)
Driving on a combination of roads for 13000 spirited miles
very good in dry and wet road. i have them for 20k km and i heve no complaint. i am going to buy it again
tire reviewed on 2015-01-07 06:17:17
Writing about the Continental Eco Contact 3 given 91% (185-65-15-H)
Driving on a combination of roads for 40000 average miles
i made 63000km. i guess i ll make 10000 more with the same tires. little bit noisy but both wet and dry performance is so sufficient.
tire reviewed on 2012-10-17 18:27:26
Drive this car? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire