SEAT Toledo Tires

On this page you will find the best real world tire reviews from owners of the SEAT Toledo.

Do you Drive a SEAT Toledo? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire! After all, who knows what the best tire for a Toledo better than the owners?

Review Your Tires >>

Tire Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Nokian WR D3 (42) 91% 88% 88% 87% 85% 87%
Vredestein Sportrac 5 (98) 88% 85% 84% 83% 86% 84%
Hankook Optimo 4S (32) 86% 86% 79% 78% 78% 88%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 (40) 82% 84% 78% 78% 87% 83%
Matador MP 46 Hectorra 2 (57) 88% 82% 79% 75% 85% 84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (322) 91% 88% 81% 84% 73% 78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun (101) 87% 83% 81% 80% 77% 79%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance (247) 86% 84% 76% 78% 73% 85%
Sava Eskimo S3 Plus (29) 76% 75% 71% 73% 78% 83%
Dunlop Sport BluResponse (183) 88% 84% 79% 76% 62% 83%
Lassa Snoways Era (12) 78% 76% 77% 75% 76% 79%
Bridgestone A001 (47) 91% 92% 89% 80% 84% 83%
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 (193) 83% 77% 77% 72% 78% 71%
Premiorri ViaMaggiore (7) 68% 58% 68% 68% 86% 55%
Federal Himalaya WS1 Winter (4) 70% 68% 58% 63% 73% 50%
Continental Premium Contact 2 (198) 84% 77% 75% 73% 62% 73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 (87) 78% 86% 76% 73% 61% 75%
Petlas Snow Master W651 (27) 77% 66% 64% 69% 86% 71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 (18) 84% 69% 69% 69% 81% 72%
Pirelli P 7 (85) 79% 69% 71% 68% 73% 65%
Bridgestone Turanza T001 (107) 80% 70% 69% 67% 63% 72%
Dunlop SP Sport Maxx (165) 79% 69% 69% 67% 63% 64%
Continental EcoContact 6 (112) 74% 57% 59% 61% 54% 69%
Zeta Alventi (16) 71% 64% 53% 53% 58% 51%
Durun A One (23) 71% 51% 62% 51% 51% 54%
Lassa Atracta (5) 62% 45% 50% 42% 78% 50%
Triangle TR918 (11) 65% 30% 57% 46% 76% 62%
Kumho Ecsta 712 (10) 69% 42% 51% 47% 74% 50%
Event GL695 (9) 60% 36% 58% 51% 50% 38%

SEAT Toledo Tire Review Highlights

Writing about the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 given 47% (185-60-15-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
First winter the tires were good. The next one almost crashed twice. Almost no grip on snow and ice. Wet was acceptable, but still bad. For 3 winters (probably ~15000 km), already below 4mm tread. I'll never buy them again.
tire reviewed on 2023-11-20 07:55:00
Writing about the Zeta Alventi given 94% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 13000 average miles
i had Pirelli tires fitted from new on my car and these lasted 35000 miles tread was great, good fuel low noise, good grip/ dry and wet, however side walls cracked on all four after 3yrs so was advised to change. I read reviews on the Zeta Aventi so tried them out,, half the cost of Pirelli and im now at 48000 miles and the tires are still like new. Zeta was never known to me in the past but i would even say they are better handling, less noise than Pirelli, only down side to these tires is the fuel economy, i am down around 4 mpg saying this i will only buy these tires for all of my vehicles if they have the size.
4.5 / 5, FIRST CLASS tire top end budget, but almost on par with top brand tires for at least half the price..
tire reviewed on 2023-08-20 10:30:22
Writing about the Federal Himalaya WS1 Winter given 83% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 10 miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2022-10-01 07:45:13
Writing about the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 given 76% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2022-05-10 13:35:36
Writing about the Bridgestone Turanza ER300 given 66% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 average miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2022-05-10 13:34:23
Writing about the Dunlop SP Sport Maxx given 80% (215-45-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 25000 average miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2022-05-10 13:32:36
Writing about the Durun A One given 0% (215-40-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 15 spirited miles
Brought them 2 year ago done abort 15,000 on the can Handel the speed and weight a good tire for the money 💰 and when I need more I will buy again
tire reviewed on 2020-05-08 12:56:21
Writing about the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun given 80% (215-45-16-)
Driving on for 0 miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2020-04-07 05:50:46
Writing about the Continental EcoContact 6 given 64% (195-50-16-H)
Driving on mostly town for 1000 easy going miles
My car a 2014 SEAT TOLEDO 1.6 TDI has a firm suspension (semi rigid axle on the back wheels) coupled with low profile oem tires (215/45/16) made for an uncomfortable ride. I tried changing to Falken ziex310 ecorun with deeper profile (205/50/16) but, although grip and road feedback were brilliant, comfort, noise and fuel consumption were bad. So i changed to contis ecocontact6. These tires do improve ride quality significantly over bumps and potholes. I also saw a 10% better fuel consumption compared to the Falkens. BUT road feedback is terrible. Nowhere near the Falkens. Can't imagine anyone using them for spirited driving. Depending on how fast or slow they wear, i will consider if i will buy them again.
tire reviewed on 2020-03-31 09:41:02
Writing about the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun given 79% (205-50-16-W)
Driving on mostly town for 6000 easy going miles
Positives: Grip both on dry and wet is superb. Especially on wet. These tires inspire confidence. When you are driving it feels like there is a huge invisible hand pressing the car down and the road feedback is phenomenal. Low wear. And of course the price. Value for money indeed. Negatives: High fuel consumption. I quess that superb grip comes at a price. Noise levels were also elevated. And lastly comfort. These tires provide a firm ride. My car has also a firm suspension and together made the ride uncomfortable. I drive 95% in the city on terrible roads, full of bumps and potholes, so i changed them to continentals ecocontact 6 which did provide a more comfortable ride, much better fuel efficiency and low noise. But the feedback is terrible and nowhere near the Falkens. So i would not buy again. But if i drove frequent long journeys, in twisty roads or long distances then i would pick the falkens again.
tire reviewed on 2020-03-31 09:14:56
Writing about the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun given 79% (205-50-16-W)
Driving on mostly town for 6000 easy going miles
Positives: Grip both on dry and wet is superb. Especially on wet. These tires inspire confidence. When you are driving it feels like there is a huge invisible hand pressing the car down and the road feedback is phenomenal. Low wear. And of course the price. Value for money indeed. Negatives: High fuel consumption. I quess that superb grip comes at a price. Noise levels were also elevated. And lastly comfort. These tires provide a firm ride. My car has also a firm suspension and together made the ride uncomfortable. I drive 95% in the city on terrible roads, full of bumps and potholes, so i changed them to continentals ecocontact 6 which did provide a more comfortable ride, much better fuel efficiency and low noise. But the feedback is terrible and nowhere near the Falkens. So i would not buy again. But if i drove frequent long journeys, in twisty roads or long distances then i would pick the falkens again.
tire reviewed on 2020-03-31 07:08:08
Writing about the Nokian WR D3 given 80% (185-60-15-T)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 spirited miles
I was trying to find WR D4s back in 2016, but as I needed the tires quickly, I bought the D3s.
I'm relatively happy with the tires. Almost no wear for 3 winters. This is their fourth season and they grip very well. I had issues with breaking on wet surfaces in the beginning, but never had problems with aquaplaning. I also had issues with higher speeds. The car feels a bit uncomfortable over 160km/h or over 140 in corners(a bit wobbly).
Noise is also a bit higher then I would like.

So, If you are a calm driver, this one is definitely a good choice.
tire reviewed on 2020-01-08 16:21:26
Drive this car? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire