Toyota Wish Tires

On this page you will find the best real world tire reviews from owners of the Toyota Wish.

Do you Drive a Toyota Wish? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire! After all, who knows what the best tire for a Wish better than the owners?

Review Your Tires >>

Tire Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Minerva Radial 209 (2) 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 100%
Dunlop Direzza Sport Z1 Star Spec (6) 92% 83% 88% 88% 77% 82%
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax (6) 90% 90% 80% 82% 84% 82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 (302) 90% 88% 84% 84% 73% 82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 (115) 90% 81% 80% 79% 80% 81%
Michelin Energy Saver Plus (63) 83% 71% 78% 76% 91% 82%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 (66) 84% 79% 81% 81% 77% 75%
Michelin Energy Saver 4 (2) 75% 65% 65% 80% 95% 90%
Michelin Primacy 4 (165) 85% 81% 74% 76% 81% 83%
Kumho Ecsta PS31 (62) 82% 78% 74% 79% 74% 78%
Lassa Impetus Revo (12) 86% 77% 78% 75% 73% 73%
Kumho Ecsta KU31 (165) 83% 75% 77% 76% 72% 74%
Michelin Energy XM2 (52) 80% 74% 73% 74% 86% 73%
Continental Premium Contact 5 (117) 87% 83% 76% 77% 58% 78%
Nexen CP661 (10) 77% 71% 69% 72% 80% 76%
Three A P606 (47) 79% 73% 69% 69% 72% 76%
Kumho Solus KH17 (56) 76% 70% 70% 69% 67% 70%
Yokohama dB super E spec (6) 72% 55% 70% 68% 66% 80%
Triangle SporteX TH201 (27) 70% 52% 58% 56% 63% 65%
Hifly HF201 (34) 57% 43% 49% 43% 45% 56%

Toyota Wish Tire Review Highlights

Writing about the Michelin Energy XM2 given 91% (195-65-15-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 40000 easy going miles
One of the best tires, long lasting and supreme grip even in wet weather condition. Downside is it is noiser compare to cc6. But overall I am very satisfied with it performance.
tire reviewed on 2024-10-16 05:34:23
Writing about the Kumho Ecsta PS31 given 90% (205-55-16-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 0 spirited miles
After several years of using Toyo CR1 tires, I started looking for v-shape tires to make me more confident driving in the rain. 1st time using this tire, I'm quite excited, the feeling I get is the same as Toyo, comfort and not too hard. The most win when driving in the middle of the rain, even when the water stagnates even once, the tire never floats or runs to the side, even though the tire is a bit low.
tire reviewed on 2024-10-16 00:31:37
Writing about the Michelin Primacy 4 given 94% (195-60-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 358 average miles
This is a review comparing it to the summer tire Michelin Energy Saver that I used last time.
The vehicle installed is a late 2011 Toyota Wish 1.8S with a current mileage of approximately 270,000 km. The average annual mileage is approximately 22,000km, including 14,000km on summer tires.
Due to the snowy terrain, we used three types of tires: summer, all-weather, and studless. After use, they are cleaned, maintained, covered, and stored in a tire stocker in the garage.
In the summer (no snow season), it's summer tires ➔ In early winter (snowfall season - before the snow compaction road), it's all weather ➔ In the middle of winter (snow compaction road - icy road), it's studless ➔ In early spring (ice melting road - before the end of snowfall), it's open Ruler Weather➔In the summer Samataiya

Dry and wet grip: I felt that the grip of the Energy Saver had decreased after 40,000 km, but I felt that the grip of Primacy 4 was almost the same after 40,000 km as when I first started using it.
Tire wear rate: The mileage at which the slip sign appeared was 50,000 km for the Energy Saver and 55,000 km for the Primacy 4, which is 10% better.
Comfort: I felt that the Primacy 4 was superior in terms of comfort at the time of purchase, but after driving 50,000 km, I felt that both cars were noisy. Comfort seems to decrease in proportion to driving distance.
Repurchase: Currently, the plan is to repurchase Premacy 4 again. The reason is that the initial grip performance does not change for a long time, and it has high wear resistance and long life.
tire reviewed on 2023-10-15 08:13:39
Writing about the Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 given 69% (215-50-17-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 27000 average miles
Compared to Hankook Ventus V12 Evo2, these tire towards comforts, good for motorway (coasting) and eco-friendly. Bought in Jan 2020 and these tire still at my car with 60% thread available. At this age, the tires still give me a comfort driving, however it started to loose a grip during heavy rain (avg. speed 90-100km/h) on motorway. Elsewhere Hankook Prime 3 K125 is worth every penny you spend, but I missed the performance of Hankook Ventus V12 Evo2 (mehh for the noise level).
tire reviewed on 2022-09-09 06:13:41
Writing about the Michelin Energy Saver 4 given 74% (195-65-15-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 25000 average miles
No comments
tire reviewed on 2022-01-24 01:16:04
Writing about the Triangle SporteX TH201 given 80% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 49710 average miles
Best tires for it's price. Tires grip well both dry and wet on straights. steering does not get pulled when going through a puddle resulting in absolute control. Aquaplaning is minimal, you can speed on wet straights. Cornering is ok for dry, not a good idea to speed while wet cornering. Noise and comfort is good for the first 40k-50k kilometres. Used it till worn out at about 80k kilometres.
tire reviewed on 2021-12-06 01:04:44
Writing about the Hifly HF201 given 10% (205-65-15-)
Driving on mostly town for 2000 easy going miles
These would have to be the worst tire I have ever had. The road noise and vibration is like driving on off road 4 wheel drive tires. Even had to check wheel bearings to see the noise wasn't coming from them. Put on a set of half worn tires from a friends car and the problems dissapeared straight away. Put my wheels on his car and it had the same issue. I don't know how people can sell these and tell you they are a good tire and great value for money. Should be a crime to sell them. Tire shop didn't want to know about them . They have done approx 4,000 Kim's and will never get to do anymore on my car . Avoid them like the plague
tire reviewed on 2021-06-05 19:10:00
Writing about the Michelin Primacy 4 given 86% (205-55-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 100 average miles
I actually bought the primacy 4 ST version, pretty damn quiet comparing to my old michelin energy saver tires.softer, at least 75% quieter. more comfortable, has more grip, theres a split second once u start turning, where there is a lack of feedback from the tire, prolly due to the higher profile tires n softer compound. Overall pretty darn good
tire reviewed on 2021-03-15 20:07:42
Writing about the Three A P606 given 27% (225-55-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 0 average miles
THIS TYRE IS VERY NOISY, IM REGRET TO BUY THIS TYRE. I WANT TO CHANGE.
tire reviewed on 2019-09-16 21:37:59
Writing about the Kumho Solus KH17 given 99% (195-65-15-H)
Driving on mostly motorways for 120000 easy going miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2018-05-26 03:07:41
Writing about the Minerva Radial 209 given 86% (195-65-15-V)
Driving on mostly town for 5000 easy going miles
I feel like michelin tire
tire reviewed on 2018-04-18 22:39:21
Writing about the Continental Premium Contact 5 given 71% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly town for 12000 average miles
Have driven the CPC5's on my car for about 20000 km now, over the course of 1.5 years.

All of my tires have about 1mm of thread above the 3mm Continental Wear indicators (not the 1.6mm wear indicators; total 4mm thread left now, originally 8mm if I recalled correctly). This gives a wear rate of about 1mm per 5000km approximately on generally well-maintained asphalt roads. The wear rate aren't totally the same across one tires. Even after 3 tire rotation cycles, one particular tire seems to be worn a bit more than the other 3, leading me to believe there's a significant difference in rubber compound quality between batches.

Performance (grip and comfort) has been superb when new, but at about part midlife, the tires are getting noisy, transmit vibration and bumps to the cabin more than what I remembered initially, and squeaks more when turning in indoor carparks with smooth flooring. Did a couple of emergency braking on dry road and they performed admirably. Tires have never slipped when accelerating or hard-braking on wet road so far. I don't remember it aquaplaning too when driven at speed over puddles. I drive the car spiritedly at times, but most of its time on the road is for average work-home commute in busy traffic 40-70 km/hr.
tire reviewed on 2017-06-21 01:21:53
Drive this car? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire