2014 Auto Review Max Performance Tire Test

Test Summary
Wet BrakingPirelli P Zero Corsa
Dry BrakingHankook Ventus S1 evo2
NoiseMichelin Pilot Super Sport
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Snow BrakingMichelin Pilot Super Sport
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Snow HandlingMichelin Pilot Super Sport
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Pirelli P Zero Corsa
A 444bhp Mustang Boss 302 might not be the last word in car dynamics, but it's what the Russian magazine Auto Review have chosen to use for their 2014 Max Performance tire test. Wearing massive 255/40 R19 front tires, and 285/35 R19 rears, this was never going to be an "ordinary" tire test, and the inclusion of a drifting test only highlighted the testers were out to have fun driving while getting their data.

After the clinical nature of German tire tests, this is a great way of being different, and could put a different spin on the overall results. But it didn't.

The Continental still won thanks to a commanding wet performance, the Michelin Pilot Super Sport was still excellent in the dry and wear tests but lacked a little in the wet, the new Hankook had another a strong all round performance and the Goodyear was still a great all round tire... other than aquaplaning, which has never been a problem in smaller sizes.

The Results

1st: Continental ContiSportContact 5 P

Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
  • 255/40 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 99
  2. Dry: 28
  3. Wet: 46
  4. Comfort: 8
  5. Noise: 8
  6. Wear: 9
Braking in the wet and dry, handling in the wet
Low resistance to aquaplaning
In 2011 the 5P won our tire test on a Focus RS and Scirocco R, and the Continental is equally good on a Mustang! On the wet track the car has good grip, and starts to slide smoothly and predictably. In the dry, the tire doesn't quite have the control accuracy as the Michelin or Pirelli, but it has a good time none the less. No problems with wear, and good comfort make for a lovely tire for everyday use on high speed cars.

Read Reviews    Buy from £165.47

2nd: Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Michelin Pilot Super Sport
  • 255/40 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 99
  2. Dry: 29
  3. Wet: 42
  4. Comfort: 9
  5. Noise: 9
  6. Wear: 10
Handling in the dry, comfort, wear
Handling in the wet
The Michelin Pilot Super Sport has been created using technology from the 24 hour race at Le Mans, and you can tell on the track! It’s one of the best tires on the track and road in the dry, and even after drifting the tread shows very little sign of wear. In the wet, the tires prove slightly worse. Resistance to aquaplaning raises no objections, but on the road the driver is forced to work harder than with other tires once on the limit. Perfect for those who want to enjoy the fast ride.

Read Reviews

3rd: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
  • 255/40 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 96
  2. Dry: 26
  3. Wet: 47
  4. Comfort: 7
  5. Noise: 7
  6. Wear: 9
Traction on wet roads, handling on wet roads, high resistance to aquaplaning
Noise, low comfort, dry handling
The new Hankook S1 Evo 2 have a near flawless performance in the wet. They grip well and are backed by predictable behavior on a winding road. Though the laps are slightly slower than Goodyear and Conti, the tire has excellent control, with an excellence resistance to aquaplaning rounding out the wet performance. Slightly weaker in the dry, the performance is average, with good grip ruined by a snappy on-the-limit style and comparatively high noise and low comfort. An excellent choice for those who gives priority to safety on a wet road.

Read Reviews

4th: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
  • 255/40 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 98
  2. Dry: 26
  3. Wet: 46
  4. Comfort: 8
  5. Noise: 9
  6. Wear: 9
Braking in the wet and dry, handling in the wet
Low aquaplaning resistance
Last year the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 won the 17 inch UHP tire test, and they've proven to be excellent in 19” too - short braking distances, fastest time on the winding road test, and very nice to drift on too! The main drawback of these tires is puddles, where unlike their 17 inch counterparts, these seem to aquaplane earlier than the other tires on test, but subjectively they're a little number than the Michelin and Pirelli in the dry too. They're a quiet tire, with medium ride comfort, and while they wore slightly more than the best while drifting, the higher starting tread depth meant total cost is fine. Great tires overall, but beware of puddles with tires over 255 wide.

Read Reviews

5th: Bridgestone Potenza S001

Bridgestone Potenza S001
  • 255/40 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 95
  2. Dry: 25
  3. Wet: 42
  4. Comfort: 9
  5. Noise: 9
  6. Wear: 10
Aquaplaning, high treadwear, comfort
Handling on dry pavement
The Bridgestone S001 has a surprisingly poor subjective score, feeling numb in both the wet and dry and with only average grip, not feeling that sporty. Excellent wear and extremely comfortable makes it look like Bridgestone have taken this tire too far away from the sporty feel they often enjoy. Good tires for everyday driving, but for track days is better to choose something else.

Read Reviews    Buy from £189.72

6th: Pirelli P Zero Corsa

Pirelli P Zero Corsa
  • 255/40 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 88
  2. Dry: 30
  3. Wet: 36
  4. Comfort: 7
  5. Noise: 9
  6. Wear: 6
Braking performance on dry pavement, handling on dry pavement
Grip and control on wet pavement, low resistance to aquaplaning, low comfort
The Pirelli P Zero would have been the correct tire to have in this test, however as it’s not made in the sizes required, Pirelli opted to send the Corsa System, which is more an extreme performance / trackday combination of tires. The combination of a directional front and asymmetric rear just gave the tire the edge in the dry over the Michelin, but it struggled in the wet with braking, cornering and aquaplaning. Low comfort and high wear make these good track tires, but for everyday use is better to use more versatile tire.

Read Reviews

7th: Kumho Ecsta KU31

Kumho Ecsta KU31
  • 255/40 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 81
  2. Dry: 21
  3. Wet: 35
  4. Comfort: 8
  5. Noise: 8
  6. Wear: 9
Price
Grip and control on wet pavement, low resistance to aquaplaning, grip and handling on dry pavement
The Kumho KU31 looks smart, but unfortunately doesn't deliver in test. On wet roads the performance is mediocre with plenty of understeer and poor aquaplaning performance, and in the dry the braking distance from 62 mph is almost 4 meters longer than the best on test, which means when the Continental had stopped, the car would still be travelling at near 20 mph! Not the best option for road or track.

Read Reviews

comments powered by Disqus