Menu
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 View Gallery (1)
205-305/30-60 R16-20 144 sizes 2021

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

This tire is also known as the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117.

9.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
76%
Road Feedback
76%
Handling
79%
Wear
66%
Comfort
72%
Buy again
63%
83 Reviews
74% Average
994,701 miles driven
35 Tests (avg: 5th)
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

Summer Premium
BETA
9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
83.8
0.32x / 7 tests
Value
81.3
0.42x / 10 tests
Wet
79.6
2x / 27 tests
Dry
74.4
1.8x / 21 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
79.6
22 tests
Handling
75.4
20 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 34
Publications: 11
Period: 2012 - 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 83
Avg Rating: 73.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.38
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tire Test Auto Bild 2020 265/35 R19 4/10 8 metrics
2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2019 245/45 R18 6/11 9 metrics
2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tire Test Gute Fahrt 2019 225/40 R18 5/12 4 metrics
2018 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express 2018 225/45 R17 8/10 0 metrics
2018 Ace 235/45 R18 Summer Tire Test ACE 2018 235/45 R18 4/11 0 metrics
2018 Test World Summer Tire Test Test World 2018 225/45 R17 7/16 7 metrics
2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2018 265/35 R19 2/6 8 metrics
2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tire Test Sport Auto 2018 265/35 R19 3/9 8 metrics
2017 Motor Mag UHP Tire Test 2017 235/35 R19 5/9 3 metrics
2017 EVO Summer Tire Test EVO 2017 225/40 R18 7/9 4 metrics
2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2017 245/40 R18 4/9 6 metrics
2017 AMS Summer UHP Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2017 245/45 R18 4/10 4 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2017 235/35 R19 2/9 4 metrics
2016 EVO Summer Performance Tire Test EVO 2016 235/35 R19 8/9 0 metrics
2016 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express 2016 225/40 R18 6/9 0 metrics
2016 Test World Performance Tire Test Test World 2016 225/40 R18 5/13 0 metrics
2016 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tire Test Sport Auto 2016 235/40 R18 3/8 0 metrics
2016 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2016 255/35 R20 2/6 0 metrics
2016 GTU Performance Summer Tire Test 2016 225/45 R17 9/14 0 metrics
2016 ADAC Tire Test - 225/45 R17 ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 5/16 0 metrics
2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tire Test EVO 2015 225/40 R18 7/10 0 metrics
2015 Auto Express Tire Test Auto Express 2015 225/45 R17 4/11 0 metrics
2015 Auto Review Summer Tire Test 2015 225/45 R17 4/9 0 metrics
2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire Test Auto Express 2015 235/35 R19 3/7 0 metrics
2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tire Test EVO 2014 225/45 R17 8/10 0 metrics
2014 Auto Review Max Performance Tire Test Auto Review 2014 255/40 R19 3/7 0 metrics
2014 ACE Summer Tire Test ACE 2014 225/45 R17 10/11 0 metrics
2013 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express 2013 225/45 R17 4/10 0 metrics
2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test Sport Auto 2013 225/40 R18 6/10 0 metrics
2013 European Summer Sports Tire Test ADAC 2013 225/45 R17 6/18 0 metrics
2012 EVO Summer Tire Test EVO 2012 225/45 R17 7/10 0 metrics
2012 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test Sport Auto 2012 235/35 R19 3/9 0 metrics
2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test Auto Bild 2012 225/45 R17 3/15 0 metrics
2012 Autobild 50 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2012 225/45 R17 3/45 0 metrics
35
Tests
5th
Average
2nd
Best
10th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
4th/10
Excellent tire with a balanced performance in all tests, stable in the dry and wet, low noise, low fuel use, good price to performance ratio.
Slightly slow steering response.
Recommended.
A well balanced tire, good wet handling, high aquaplaning resistance.
None mentioned.
Highly Recommended.
6th/11
Good aquaplaning resistance, short dry braking, good levels of comfort.
Relatively long wet braking.
Good.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/60R16 92 W C B 69
205/60R16 92 V C B 69
205/55R16 91 W C A 71
205/60R16 92 V C B 65
205/60R16 92 W C B 69
205/60R16 96 V XL C B 70
17 inch
225/50R17 94 W D A 71
225/50R17 94 W C B 71
225/50R17 94 W B B 69
225/45R17 91 W D C 70
225/50R17 94 Y C B 69
225/50R17 98 Y XL C B 69
225/45R17 91 W C A 71
225/45R17 91 W C A 70
225/50R17 98 W XL C A 71
225/50R17 98 Y XL C B 70
225/45R17 91 V C A 71
225/45R17 91 W C A 70
18 inch
245/45R18 100 Y XL B A 67
245/40R18 93 Y D B 70
245/45R18 100 Y XL C A 70
245/45R18 100 Y XL B A 70
245/45R18 100 Y XL C A 72
225/40R18 92 Y XL C B 71
245/45R18 96 W C B 68
245/40R18 93 Y D B 70
245/40R18 97 Y XL C C 68
245/40R18 97 Y XL D B 71
245/45R18 96 W B B 68
245/45R18 96 W B B 68
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 >>

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2

Ask a question
October 6, 2016

I've got the Hanhook Ventus S1 evo2 tires on a new Mercedes GLC 4matic - what can I expect driving in snow / ice conditions? What would be a good alternative winter tire?

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 is a summer tire, and as such will have very little snow and ice performance. There are many good winter tires, depending on your tire size and vehicle, have a read around TireReviews!
June 20, 2017

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV - Is it a run flat type of tire?

There are both runflat and non-runflat versions of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV.
May 1, 2023

Is the Hankook venous S1 evo2 SUV 235/50R19 99v the same as the Hankook ventus S1 evo2 three?

Generally the SUV variants of tires are the same or very similar to their non-suv version, but listed as SUV tires in SUV size and load ratings.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 75 user reviews

Drivers' feedback on the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 is mixed but leans moderately positive. Many high-scoring reviews praise strong dry and wet grip, confident handling/feedback, and good value, with several noting solid performance even on powerful cars and occasional track use. However, a significant minority report fast/uneven wear, increasing noise with age, and weaker wet grip for some fitments; a few mention vibration or sidewall/foam issues. Overall, the S1 evo2 suits drivers prioritizing performance and price, but longevity, noise, and wet consistency can be concerns.

Strengths
  • Dry grip
  • Wet grip
  • Handling/feedback
  • Value for money
  • High-speed stability
Areas for Improvement
  • Fast wear/tread life
  • Road noise as they age
  • Wet grip inconsistency
  • Comfort/harshness
  • Vibration or sidewall/foam issues

Top 3 Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 Reviews

Given 100% while driving a BMW 520i (245/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 60,000 average miles
these are the OEM tires on the BMW 520 year 2020. Amazing in everything. Had to change due after 5 years of fit.
I drove 70k km.
Excellent conditions in everything. Hightly recommended.
May 2, 2025
Given 53% while driving a Hyundai Santa Fe (225/55 R19) on mostly motorways for 11,000 miles
11000 miles since being fitted, and both front tires on my 2017 Hyundai Santa Fe are not far off the wear indicators. Would have expected a higher mileage from them, especially as the majority of the vehicles use is motorway driving.
September 5, 2025
Given 74% while driving a Mitsubishi Evolution X (275/35 R18) on mostly town for 5,000 spirited miles
Very impressed for the cost of the tire. Wear is weak
July 7, 2023

How would you rate the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 Reviews

Given 37% while driving a Audi A4 (245/35 R19) on mostly motorways for 0 easy going miles
Only driving to work on flat covered road including express road. One of new tires got completely flat so had to get replaced only after driven 4 month (under 300km) of new car. Two front tires completely worn out below legal limit with 25,000km. Absolutely rubbish in quality, and we feel A4 is lower in grade than other premium cars on the market.
December 1, 2025
Given 74% while driving a Volkswagen Golf Mk7.5 1.5TSI 150HP (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 16,500 average miles
I have this tires since 2020 and I drive with them around 27.000km and still they have 6mm tread thickness, but one tire is damaged, some wires inside him brake down and now I have an uneven rolling surface. At around 35kmh I have a bumpy ride and I have the feeling that the tarmac is waved and because of this problem, at 130kmh I have a vibration on the hole car. I would say that this tires are maximum OK. But I will go back to Continental and Michelin.
April 1, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 50% while driving a BMW X1 2.0d Sdrive (225/45 R18) on mostly town for 4,000 average miles
For such a premium expensive tire I'd expect more than 4mm left after only 4,000 miles waste of money - won't be buying these again.
March 27, 2023
Given 63% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan (215/65 R17) on mostly motorways for 4,000 average miles
They feel very hard and rough ride, and are very noisy, particularly on coarse bitumen.
March 9, 2023
Given 73% while driving a SEAT Leon 5F 1.0 TSI (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Overall good summer tires. They are now probably halfway their lifespan and still performing well in the "warmer" months of the year here in northeastern Europa (Netherlands & Belgium). Since I use Michelin Crossclimate+ tires from October to March I have been able to split the miles I've driven over two sets of tires. That being said, they are still doing well even though they are now getting on in mileage. There is still around 5,5-6.0 mm tread left on them. I usually drive in quite a conservative manner, but occassionally do like to hook some corners and look for the limits on quiet roundabouts. Must say, they definitely give confidence when pushed a bit. Since the allseason Michelins are a different size (205/55 R16) and obviously used in the colder months of the year, it is hard to compare them in terms of fuel usage. On average they seem to do about the same. I used to have 16 inch summer tires (Vredestein Sportrac 5) and those did give about 5% better mileage. But nowhere near as nice to drive and in most summer conditions these 17 inch Hankooks allow for more fun and speed before the inevitable understuur kicks in. There are probably better summer tires out there, but if you can get them relatively cheap (as I did) they're a great choice.
December 17, 2022
Given 51% while driving a Renault Laguna 3 (225/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 25,000 spirited miles
Second Hankook tires and a big disappointment. Grip in the dry is average while in the wet they are catastrophic. They slide in corners both fast and slow, there is simply no grip. Winter tires have far more wet grip. Never again Hankook.
October 21, 2022
Given 64% while driving a Lancia (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,500 average miles
After a bit more than 20.000 km these tires have noticeably less grip than at the start of their life. They have handled very strangely from the start. Car is acting like it was on rails on roads that are a bit tracked by heavy traffic. I've never felt this in my entire driving "career". These tires don't have wheel protection lip which, besides not having alloy wheel curb protection, also makes them look a bit strange. Not a bad tire, but I am much more satisfied with my winter set of Kleber Krisalps.
June 17, 2022
Given 64% while driving a Audi A5 2.0 TDi (2017) (255/35 R19) on mostly town for 15,534 easy going miles
(AO) In the 4th year there were cracks on the tires, especially visible between the blocks. In general, the condition is good. At the tire fitting they said, after 4 years of operation, change it, as it began to crumble during dismantling. Didn't take risks.
June 11, 2022
Given 76% while driving a Audi a5 3.0 tdi quattro sport (255/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 50,000 spirited miles
(fitted as default tires by manufacturer) tires provide excellent grip in dry + wet, good & sporty feedback on the steering. Tend to get a bit louder while aging over time
May 16, 2022
Given 79% while driving a BMW 330i M Sport Coupe (265/35 R19) on mostly motorways for 23,000 spirited miles
I’ve had these for about 35000km on the car and they were driven sporty, sometimes aggressively. Overall performance in the dry is very good, apart from road noise which could be even lower (it’s not bad at all!). Performance in the wet suffers from pronounced under steer in my setup with 245 at the front, 265 at the back. Never had any issues with that on the road, but trying to get the car into a controlled oversteer is not so easy with the lack of bite at the front in wet conditions. Furthermore the shoulder wears a lot quicker than the mid section of the tire which limits the lifespan. (Before you ask: yes I take a lot of highspeed ramps on and off the autobahn. And no, my chassis does not need alignment). Overall I think it’s been a good tire and I need a replacement by the end of this season. I’ll probably check the Ventus S1 Evo3
May 11, 2022
Given 51% while driving a Audi S5 (255/35 R19) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Fitted as stock to 2017 Audi S5, they’re ok performance wise (not great at anything in my view), but noisy on rough surfaces which is not great when driving a and B roads, I’m considering removing from the car before wear limit and replacing with eagle f1 asymmetric 5 which I’ve had on other and current cars without issues. I had hankook on a previous Skoda and regretted that purchase and changed to eagles again as soon as.
November 17, 2021
Given 84% while driving a Volkswagen 2.0 TDI 4Motion 16V (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 35,000 spirited miles
A little bit noisy especially at 3 - 4 mm tread depth. When hot they have a good traction, but high noise level,
October 12, 2021
Rate the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2