Sadly Tire Reviews won't be conducting a studded tire test this year, but thankfully the excellent testers at the Swedish magazine Vi Bilagare have, and as they're some of the best Nordic drivers in the world, you can be assured this is the best studded tire test you'll see this year.

As always for a studded tire test, the tires were all tested in the dry, wet, snow and importantly ice, which is where studs really make a difference. To add another element to the testing this year Vi Bilagare bought a "joker" tire, a lightly used Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8 (the current version is the Hakkapeliitta 10) which was manufactured in 2015, making the tire both old technology AND 8 years old. The testers noted that the tire still had around 7mm of tread depth (compared to 9.1mm of the new Hakka 10) and that some studs had fallen out, and those which hadn't were somewhat blunted compared to new.

The inclusion of the old tire is really interesting, as they've also included a cheap Chinese, so we can answer whether an old premium studded to tire is better than a new budget!

In our coverage below we'll concentrate on how the old vs new perform, but overall this is an excellent in depth test and well worth checking out the full version on the ViB website.

Test Publication:

https://www.vibilagare.se/test/dacktest

Test Size: 225/45 R17

Tires Tested: 8 tires

Test Categories:
6 categories (15 tests)

View Test Summary

Similar Tests

---

Test Category	Best Performer	Worst Performer	Difference
Dry (2 tests)
Dry Braking	▲ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8: 31.4 M	▼ Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1: 33.32 M	1.9 M (5.8%)
Subj. Dry Handling	▲ Michelin X Ice North 4: 5 Points	▼ Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2: 2 Points	3.0 Points (150.0%)
Wet (3 tests)
Wet Braking	▲ Hankook Winter i pike RS2: 35.85 M	▼ Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506: 39.19 M	3.3 M (8.5%)
Wet Handling	▲ Continental IceContact 3: 41.1 s	▼ Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506: 42.6 s	1.5 s (3.5%)
Straight Aqua	▲ Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1: 59.1 Km/H	▼ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10: 55.1 Km/H	4.0 Km/H (7.3%)
Snow (3 tests)
Snow Braking	▲ Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506: 12.8 M	▼ Michelin X Ice North 4: 13.24 M	0.4 M (3.3%)
Snow Traction	▲ Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2: 4.79 s	▼ Hankook Winter i pike RS2: 4.9 s	0.1 s (2.2%)
Snow Handling	▲ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10: 74.8 s	▼ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8: 79 s	4.2 s (5.3%)
Ice (3 tests)
Ice Braking	▲ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10: 12.77 M	▼ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8: 19.03 M	6.3 M (32.9%)
Ice Traction	▲ Michelin X Ice North 4: 5.55 s	▼ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8: 8.66 s	3.1 s (35.9%)
Ice Handling	▲ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10: 39.3 s	▼ Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506: 44.1 s	4.8 s (10.9%)
Comfort (2 tests)
Subj. Comfort	▲ Continental IceContact 3: 5 Points	▼ Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1: 2 Points	3.0 Points (150.0%)
Noise	▲ Continental IceContact 3: 75 dB	▼ Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1: 76 dB	1.0 dB (1.3%)
Value (2 tests)
Price	▲ Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506: 1499	▼ Continental IceContact 3: 2669	1,170.0 (43.8%)
Rolling Resistance	▲ Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8: 5.05 kg / t	▼ Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2: 5.7 kg / t	0.7 kg / t (11.4%)

Dry

Dry braking started off with a win for the used tire! If you understand tires and braking tests, this won't be a huge surprise as lower tread depth really helps improve dry braking results, especially on siped tires like these.

The testers don't report lap time for this category of tire, but they do report subjective handling scores of which the Michelin X-Ice North 4 and Continental IceContact 3 lead the way.

Wet

The Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 had the best braking in the wet, closely followed by the new Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2. Surprisingly, the worn old tire finished fourth in wet braking, ahead of its new and "better" brother, the Hakkapeliitta 10. This is harder to explain, as the 8 year old rubber should have hardened up, however it's likely the lower tread depth was once again a factor on these very soft and highly siped tires.

Highlighting the tread depth vs tread compound factor, wet handling had the old tire second to last, only beating the budget tire which had disastrous wet braking. The Continental was back at the front.

The Falken Winterpeak F-Ice 1 had the best aquaplaning resistance, and surprisingly the worn older tire out performed a number of the newer patterns, which was unexpected due to the lower tread depth. This is likely due to the newer tires prioritising more rubber on the road for improved grip, at the expense of aquaplaning performance.

Snow

The budget Goodride IceMaster Spike was the best in snow braking with the Hankook a close second. The older tire was once again near the back of the back, though confusingly it still managed to beat the Michelin.

Fortunately Michelin jumped back to the front of the group for snow traction, beaten only by the Goodyear. The older Nokian again beat the newer Nokian in what was a very close table.

Thankfully the (new) Nokian was back at the front for snow handling, with the old right at the back.

Ice

Ice is key for studded tires, and really shows where the older tire loses out. The new Nokian was best in the ice braking tests, and the old Nokian by far the worst.

Michelin snuck ahead of the new Nokian during ice traction testing but the old Nokian remained at the back.

Ice handling had the new Nokian back at the front, but this time the budget Goodride was the slowest by quite the margin.

Comfort

The Continental proved to have the highest level of subjective comfort.

The Continental was also the quietest.

Value

Lower tread depth favours rolling resistance results which meant the older tire was the best, with the Hankook the best of the new tires.

Results

1st: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
225/45 R17 94T Tread: 9.1mm 3PMSF: yes Price: 2513.00	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 5th 32.74 M 31.4 M +1.34 M 95.91% Subj. Dry Handling 5th 3 Points 5 Points -2 Points 60% Wet Braking 7th 38.58 M 35.85 M +2.73 M 92.92% Wet Handling 3rd 41.4 s 41.1 s +0.3 s 99.28% Straight Aqua 8th 55.1 Km/H 59.1 Km/H -4 Km/H 93.23% Snow Braking 4th 12.96 M 12.8 M +0.16 M 98.77% Snow Traction 5th 4.85 s 4.79 s +0.06 s 98.76% Snow Handling 1st 74.8 s 100% Ice Braking 1st 12.77 M 100% Ice Traction 2nd 5.74 s 5.55 s +0.19 s 96.69% Ice Handling 1st 39.3 s 100% Subj. Comfort 3rd 3 Points 5 Points -2 Points 60% Noise 6th 75.6 dB 75 dB +0.6 dB 99.21% Price 6th 2513 1499 +1014 59.65% Rolling Resistance 4th 5.35 kg / t 5.05 kg / t +0.3 kg / t 94.39% The Finnish winter specialist scores many points for its high level of grip on ice. It is also the best at handling slippery curves on both snow and ice without losing its course. A lightly oversteering rear end helps to rotate the car around corners. This makes the tire somewhat prone to skidding under pressure, but it remains easy to control at the grip limit. Its willingness to turn continues on asphalt rounds. However, its wet grip lags behind the best, and the steering feel on dry roads is nonlinear in character. Nokian is suitable for those looking for the best possible winter grip on snow and ice and who appreciate the joy of driving on curvy roads. A high baseline performance with peak winter features results in an overall test victory. Read Reviews
2nd: Michelin X Ice North 4
225/45 R17 94T Tread: 8.1mm 3PMSF: yes Price: 2435.00	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 4th 32.37 M 31.4 M +0.97 M 97% Subj. Dry Handling 1st 5 Points 100% Wet Braking 5th 37.56 M 35.85 M +1.71 M 95.45% Wet Handling 6th 41.8 s 41.1 s +0.7 s 98.33% Straight Aqua 6th 55.9 Km/H 59.1 Km/H -3.2 Km/H 94.59% Snow Braking 8th 13.24 M 12.8 M +0.44 M 96.68% Snow Traction 2nd 4.83 s 4.79 s +0.04 s 99.17% Snow Handling 4th 75.5 s 74.8 s +0.7 s 99.07% Ice Braking 2nd 12.93 M 12.77 M +0.16 M 98.76% Ice Traction 1st 5.55 s 100% Ice Handling 2nd 39.6 s 39.3 s +0.3 s 99.24% Subj. Comfort 3rd 3 Points 5 Points -2 Points 60% Noise 7th 75.8 dB 75 dB +0.8 dB 98.94% Price 5th 2435 1499 +936 61.56% Rolling Resistance 7th 5.5 kg / t 5.05 kg / t +0.45 kg / t 91.82% The Michelin tire exhibits short braking distances on all types of surfaces, especially on ice. It also has a high level of initial grip on winter roads. Compared to the best, it has slightly lower cornering grip and slower steering responses. The balance is clearly understeering, which also results in a stable rear that rarely breaks into a skid. On dry ground, Michelin impresses with a natural steering feel. A shallower tread depth than others and many small studs have previously resulted in low noise, but this time the road noise is on par with competitors. A good mix of high winter grip and fine asphalt characteristics brings Michelin close to winning a gold medal. This tire is suitable for those looking for a calm and safe option with good everyday comfort. Read Reviews
3rd: Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2
225/45 R17 94T Tread: 10mm 3PMSF: yes Price: 2277.00	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 2nd 32.11 M 31.4 M +0.71 M 97.79% Subj. Dry Handling 6th 2 Points 5 Points -3 Points 40% Wet Braking 2nd 35.94 M 35.85 M +0.09 M 99.75% Wet Handling 2nd 41.2 s 41.1 s +0.1 s 99.76% Straight Aqua 2nd 57.3 Km/H 59.1 Km/H -1.8 Km/H 96.95% Snow Braking 4th 12.96 M 12.8 M +0.16 M 98.77% Snow Traction 1st 4.79 s 100% Snow Handling 3rd 75.3 s 74.8 s +0.5 s 99.34% Ice Braking 3rd 12.97 M 12.77 M +0.2 M 98.46% Ice Traction 3rd 6.09 s 5.55 s +0.54 s 91.13% Ice Handling 2nd 39.6 s 39.3 s +0.3 s 99.24% Subj. Comfort 7th 2 Points 5 Points -3 Points 40% Noise 2nd 75.4 dB 75 dB +0.4 dB 99.47% Price 4th 2277 1499 +778 65.83% Rolling Resistance 8th 5.7 kg / t 5.05 kg / t +0.65 kg / t 88.6% The second generation of the UltraGrip Arctic has short braking distances on all types of surfaces. Despite having class-leading wet grip and the shortest braking distances on dry roads, Goodyear manages to match Nokian and Michelin when it comes to stopping on ice and snow. The initial grip on winter roads is also impressive. However, the lateral grip is not quite on par with the very best, and the tire also has vague steering precision, making it somewhat difficult to place under pressure. This applies to both winter and dry roads. Nevertheless, it doesnt cause any trouble and never puts the driver in a tight spot. Goodyear is suitable for those who often drive on dry roads but want studs for the treacherous black ice that lurks in the shadows. Read Reviews
4th: Falken Winterpeak F Ice 1
225/45 R17 94T Tread: 9.1mm 3PMSF: yes Price: 2124.00	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 8th 33.32 M 31.4 M +1.92 M 94.24% Subj. Dry Handling 6th 2 Points 5 Points -3 Points 40% Wet Braking 3rd 36.98 M 35.85 M +1.13 M 96.94% Wet Handling 3rd 41.4 s 41.1 s +0.3 s 99.28% Straight Aqua 1st 59.1 Km/H 100% Snow Braking 3rd 12.85 M 12.8 M +0.05 M 99.61% Snow Traction 6th 4.86 s 4.79 s +0.07 s 98.56% Snow Handling 5th 76.1 s 74.8 s +1.3 s 98.29% Ice Braking 4th 14.6 M 12.77 M +1.83 M 87.47% Ice Traction 5th 6.51 s 5.55 s +0.96 s 85.25% Ice Handling 5th 41 s 39.3 s +1.7 s 95.85% Subj. Comfort 7th 2 Points 5 Points -3 Points 40% Noise 8th 76 dB 75 dB +1 dB 98.68% Price 3rd 2124 1499 +625 70.57% Rolling Resistance 5th 5.4 kg / t 5.05 kg / t +0.35 kg / t 93.52% Last year, the F-Ice 1 was disqualified after losing its studs from the unusually soft rubber. Falken identified a production error and promised new tires to all customers who received products from the affected production period. Was it just an excuse, or is Falken's claim true? Upon testing Falken's latest studded tire, we find that the studs are securely in place. The Japanese tire has the best winter grip, second only to the more expensive brands. It also has good grip on wet asphalt and resists hydroplaning better than any other. The downside is a vague steering feel on dry roads and elevated noise levels. Falken offers a slightly more affordable option with a good mix of wet grip and winter traction. Read Reviews
5th: Continental IceContact 3
225/45 R17 94T Tread: 8.4mm 3PMSF: yes Price: 2669.00	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 6th 32.77 M 31.4 M +1.37 M 95.82% Subj. Dry Handling 1st 5 Points 100% Wet Braking 6th 37.87 M 35.85 M +2.02 M 94.67% Wet Handling 1st 41.1 s 100% Straight Aqua 7th 55.2 Km/H 59.1 Km/H -3.9 Km/H 93.4% Snow Braking 6th 12.98 M 12.8 M +0.18 M 98.61% Snow Traction 3rd 4.84 s 4.79 s +0.05 s 98.97% Snow Handling 2nd 75.1 s 74.8 s +0.3 s 99.6% Ice Braking 6th 17.14 M 12.77 M +4.37 M 74.5% Ice Traction 7th 7.88 s 5.55 s +2.33 s 70.43% Ice Handling 4th 40.8 s 39.3 s +1.5 s 96.32% Subj. Comfort 1st 5 Points 100% Noise 1st 75 dB 100% Price 7th 2669 1499 +1170 56.16% Rolling Resistance 5th 5.4 kg / t 5.05 kg / t +0.35 kg / t 93.52% Continental has failed at the most important aspect for a studded tire: achieving grip on ice. The stopping distance on ice lags far behind other premium brands. Despite having the highest price, the tire's braking performance is on par with Goodride and is only marginally better than a used tire. However, the IceContact 3 communicates well with the driver about where the grip limit is and remains controllable when traction is about to be lost. This safe and easy-to-control behavior is consistent across all surfaces. Continental scores the most points in the asphalt categories with a nice driving feel, good stability during evasive maneuvers, and low noise. But with a high price and poor ice grip, it's difficult to recommend the tire to anyone, regardless of driving type. Read Reviews
6th: Hankook Winter i pike RS2
225/45 R17 94T Tread: 9.2mm 3PMSF: yes Price: 1878.00	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 7th 32.82 M 31.4 M +1.42 M 95.67% Subj. Dry Handling 6th 2 Points 5 Points -3 Points 40% Wet Braking 1st 35.85 M 100% Wet Handling 5th 41.5 s 41.1 s +0.4 s 99.04% Straight Aqua 3rd 56.8 Km/H 59.1 Km/H -2.3 Km/H 96.11% Snow Braking 2nd 12.82 M 12.8 M +0.02 M 99.84% Snow Traction 8th 4.9 s 4.79 s +0.11 s 97.76% Snow Handling 6th 76.7 s 74.8 s +1.9 s 97.52% Ice Braking 5th 15.87 M 12.77 M +3.1 M 80.47% Ice Traction 4th 6.41 s 5.55 s +0.86 s 86.58% Ice Handling 6th 42.2 s 39.3 s +2.9 s 93.13% Subj. Comfort 2nd 4 Points 5 Points -1 Points 80% Noise 2nd 75.4 dB 75 dB +0.4 dB 99.47% Price 2nd 1878 1499 +379 79.82% Rolling Resistance 2nd 5.15 kg / t 5.05 kg / t +0.1 kg / t 98.06% The South Korean tire is one of the oldest in the group. In previous tests, Hankook had prioritized winter road conditions, but this time we find that wet grip has been improved since the last test. It stops better than any other tire on wet roads and handles hydroplaning well. However, Hankook lags behind in the ice rounds. Under pressure, Hankook easily breaks into a skid with an erratic behavior that is consistent across all surfaces. On dry roads, the steering feel is vague and also lacks straight-line stability. However, it rolls more easily than the new tires and has an acceptable noise level. At the right price, this is a reasonable option for those who prioritize economy. Read Reviews
7th: Goodride IceMaster Spike Z 506
225/45 R17 94T Tread: 9.2mm 3PMSF: yes Price: 1499.00	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 3rd 32.36 M 31.4 M +0.96 M 97.03% Subj. Dry Handling 3rd 4 Points 5 Points -1 Points 80% Wet Braking 8th 39.19 M 35.85 M +3.34 M 91.48% Wet Handling 8th 42.6 s 41.1 s +1.5 s 96.48% Straight Aqua 5th 56.4 Km/H 59.1 Km/H -2.7 Km/H 95.43% Snow Braking 1st 12.8 M 100% Snow Traction 7th 4.87 s 4.79 s +0.08 s 98.36% Snow Handling 7th 78.7 s 74.8 s +3.9 s 95.04% Ice Braking 7th 17.16 M 12.77 M +4.39 M 74.42% Ice Traction 6th 7.53 s 5.55 s +1.98 s 73.71% Ice Handling 8th 44.1 s 39.3 s +4.8 s 89.12% Subj. Comfort 3rd 3 Points 5 Points -2 Points 60% Noise 5th 75.5 dB 75 dB +0.5 dB 99.34% Price 1st 1499 100% Rolling Resistance 3rd 5.3 kg / t 5.05 kg / t +0.25 kg / t 95.28% Chinese brand Goodride boasts that their latest studded tire is developed in Finland and features 200 studs per tire. The studding is also unusually well-executed for a tire in the budget segment. However, Goodride performs worst of all the new tires on ice and is worse than the used tire in corners. One explanation is that the rubber compound is the hardest in the group. It is also the only tire with a speed rating of H for higher speeds. On snow, it performs better, where the tread pattern provides good braking grip, but the cornering grip remains low. From a harder winter tire, we would expect good performance on dry roads, but unfortunately, Goodride shows the worst wet grip in the test. This results in a modest overall point score, on par with the used tire. Read Reviews
8th: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 8
225/45 R17 94T Tread: 7.3mm 3PMSF: yes	Test # Result Best Difference % Dry Braking 1st 31.4 M 100% Subj. Dry Handling 3rd 4 Points 5 Points -1 Points 80% Wet Braking 4th 37.02 M 35.85 M +1.17 M 96.84% Wet Handling 7th 41.9 s 41.1 s +0.8 s 98.09% Straight Aqua 4th 56.5 Km/H 59.1 Km/H -2.6 Km/H 95.6% Snow Braking 7th 13.06 M 12.8 M +0.26 M 98.01% Snow Traction 3rd 4.84 s 4.79 s +0.05 s 98.97% Snow Handling 8th 79 s 74.8 s +4.2 s 94.68% Ice Braking 8th 19.03 M 12.77 M +6.26 M 67.1% Ice Traction 8th 8.66 s 5.55 s +3.11 s 64.09% Ice Handling 7th 42.6 s 39.3 s +3.3 s 92.25% Subj. Comfort 3rd 3 Points 5 Points -2 Points 60% Noise 2nd 75.4 dB 75 dB +0.4 dB 99.47% Price 2nd 0 1499 -1499 0% Rolling Resistance 1st 5.05 kg / t 100% How do eight-year-old tires with a reasonable tread depth hold up? A tire is said to improve on dry asphalt as it wears, something we can confirm. The used tire shows the lowest consumption and best stopping distance on dry roads. The rubber also performs reasonably well on wet roads with an acceptable braking distance and is not far behind in cornering grip. Snow grip is also not far off from the new tires. The major downside is a clear deterioration in ice grip. However, in icy corners, it communicates well with the driver about where the grip limit is and remains easy to handle under pressure. In fact, it holds up well compared to the budget tire even on ice. Investing in quality pays off for many years to come. Read Reviews