Dry Braking

Looking at data from fourteen tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.16% less distance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.32% faster around a lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during three dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was 0.38% faster around a lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during zero subj. dry handling tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scored 1.01% more points than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from fourteen tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during eleven wet braking tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun stopped the vehicle in 1.66% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during two wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun stopped the vehicle in 2.96% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during four wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 1.31% faster around a wet lap than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was 0.77% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during zero subj. wet handling tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scored 0.58% more points than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 0.69% faster around a wet circle than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from eleven tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during ten straight aqua tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun floated at a 3.18% higher speed than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Straight Aqua: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun slipped out at a 2.19% higher speed than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during six noise tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 measured 0.86% quieter than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Noise: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one noise tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 measured 0.32% quieter than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Noise: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during three tire weight tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 weighed 10.95% less than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Tire Weight: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during zero wear tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is predicted to cover 34.32% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Wear: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 has a 14.74% better value based on dollars per 1000 warranted miles than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Value: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun was better during nine price tests. On average the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun cost 18.19% less than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.

Best In Price: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during eight rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 had a 17.07% lower rolling resistance than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 used 3.36% less fuel than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 emitted 23.36% less particle wear matter than the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun.

Best In Abrasion: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>