Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 83% · 72
- TR Score
- 9.0/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 130
In the 9 independent tests that ran both tires, the PremiumContact 7 finished ahead 9 times and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 not once. The PremiumContact 7 stopped 9.8% shorter in the wet; the EfficientGrip Performance 2 lasted 16.1% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Continental PremiumContact 7 if you want the strongest all-round safety and driving confidence-especially frequent wet-weather driving, motorway touring, and prioritizing the shortest braking distances. Choose the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 if you prioritize long tread life, lower noise, and better cost-per-kilometer, and you're comfortable giving up some wet-braking and ultimate dynamic sharpness versus the class leader.
Where the PremiumContact 7 is stronger
- Consistently shortest braking distances in both dry and wet across all shared tests (7/7 wins in dry braking and 7/7 in wet braking)
- Stronger wet-safety envelope: often better aquaplaning results and higher wet-grip metrics (e.g., ADAC 2026 straight aquaplaning 79.7 km/h vs 75.7 km/h; AutoBild wet circle 6.53 m/s vs 5.92 m/s)
- More dynamic and precise handling feel, with higher-limit control noted in multiple reports (better steering feedback and stability at the limit)
Where the EfficientGrip Performance 2 is stronger
- Outstanding wear/longevity performance: repeatedly higher predicted mileage (e.g., 57,800 vs 44,700 km in ADAC 2026; 45,250 vs 30,750 km in AutoBild)
- Quieter, comfort-leaning character: wins noise in most shared tests (e.g., AutoBild 72.3 vs 74.1 dB; Tire Reviews 70.8 vs 72.2 dB)
- Often stronger rolling resistance / running-cost orientation, depending on test (wins rolling resistance in 3 shared cases, including Tire Reviews 7.52 vs 8.38 kg/t)
Conclusion
On performance and safety, the Continental PremiumContact 7 is the more capable tire and the more consistent top-tier choice. It wins every shared dry- and wet-braking comparison (7/7 in both), often by meaningful margins-e.g., AutoBild wet braking 40.3 m vs 45.6 m, ADAC 2024 wet braking 28.5 m vs 33.3 m, and ADAC 2026 wet braking on concrete 34.9 m vs 38.1 m. It also tends to deliver more precise steering and stronger limit behavior, which aligns with the repeated professional notes about its high reserves and controllability.
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 makes the strongest case on ownership economics and comfort: it's typically quieter (it wins noise in 5 shared cases) and it delivers notably higher predicted mileage in the tests that measure wear-e.g., ADAC 2026 wear 57,800 km vs 44,700 km and AutoBild wear 45,250 km vs 30,750 km. It's also usually the better value pick when price and “cost per distance” are included (e.g., AutoBild value 8.29 vs 12.85 price/1000). The trade-off is that its wet grip and dry feedback are more “good/satisfactory” than class-leading, which is exactly why it tends to trail in overall rankings.
Practical takeaway: if your priority is maximum safety margin-especially in heavy rain, emergency stops, and confident high-speed touring-the PremiumContact 7 is the clear winner. If you rack up high annual mileage and want a quieter, longer-lasting tire with strong overall competence (but not the very best braking), the EfficientGrip Performance 2 is the rational value/comfort choice.
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
PremiumContact 7 vs EfficientGrip Performance 2 at a glance
| Category | PremiumContact 7 | Gap | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won9 shared tests | 9 | 0 | |
| Dry13 measurements | 13 | The PremiumContact 7 stopped 3.9% shorter in the dry (8 tests) | 0 |
| Wet28 measurements | 21 | The PremiumContact 7 stopped 9.8% shorter in the wet (8 tests) | 6 |
| Comfort6 measurements | 0 | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 1 dB quieter (5 tests) | 6 |
| Value16 measurements | 4 | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 lasted 16.1% longer in the wear tests (5 tests) | 12 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The PremiumContact 7 by 0.5 | 9.0/10 |
| Owner rating72 and 130 reviews | 83% | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 by 2 points | 85% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 74% | The EfficientGrip Performance 2 by 7 points | 81% |
| Pricein the 4 tests that listed prices | +3% | The PremiumContact 7 was dearer in 3 of 4 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 56 | 16 sizes made in both | 37 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 9 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | PremiumContact 7 | Field | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P1 of 16 | P3 of 16 | |
| 2025 DEKRA Wear Test of Michelin Primacy 5 Energy vs Rivals | P5 of 8 | P7 of 8 | |
| 2024 TUV and DEKRA Test of Michelin Primacy 5 vs Rivals | P1 of 5 | P3 of 5 | |
| 2024 Motorhome Summer Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test | P2 of 20 | P4 of 20 | |
| 2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P1 of 16 | P9 of 16 | |
| 2024 Summer Tire Market Overview | P1 of 55 | P13 of 55 | |
| 2023 Motor Summer Tire Test | P1 of 8 | P5 of 8 | |
| Tire Reviews Best Summer Touring Tires | P1 of 13 | P4 of 13 |
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 9 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
PremiumContact 7
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
PremiumContact 7
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
PremiumContact 7
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the PremiumContact 7 83% from 72 reviews and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 130. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | PremiumContact 7 | Gap | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 116 | 3.9% | 121 | 8-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 53.47 | 0.6% | 53.78 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60.5 | 0.6% | 60.1 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 11.1% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 111 | 9.8% | 124 | 8-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 110 | 12.4% | 125 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 84.33 | 0.5% | 84.76 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44.7 | 1.4% | 44.1 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.3% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.6 | 10.3% | 13.2 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.5 | 0.6% | 11.57 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 49.8 | 1.4% | 49.1 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17.5 | 2% | 18 | 2-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 3.3% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.9 | 1 dB | 69.94 | 0-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23,631 | 16.1% | 27,868 | 1-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.69 | 5% | 6.37 | 1-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.65 | 0.1% | 5.65 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 74.73 | 14.3% | 63.57 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,812 | 3.9% | 1,885 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the PremiumContact 7 scores 9.5 and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 9 out of 10.
| PremiumContact 7 | Category | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | Dry | 75 | ||
| 97 | Wet | 75 | ||
| 36 | Comfort | 86 | ||
| 67 | Value | 92 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| PremiumContact 7 | Category | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.2 | Dry Grip | 9 | ||
| 9.2 | Wet Grip | 8.6 | ||
| 8.3 | Road Feedback | 8 | ||
| 8.4 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 7.3 | Wear | 9.1 | ||
| 7.5 | Comfort | 8.5 | ||
Owners rate the PremiumContact 7 83% from 72 reviews and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 130. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Continental PremiumContact 7
- 83%from 72 reviews
- 74%would buy again
- 720,352 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners are largely impressed with the Continental PremiumContact 7, rating it 82.9% on average with no outright negative reviews, and the standout theme is strong, confidence-inspiring grip in both dry and wet conditions. Nearly half of owners mention excellent dry and wet grip, often backed up by praise for secure handling and stability. The main drawback is refinement: around a quarter to a third of owners report notable road noise, and a similar share are disappointed by tread life, with wear sometimes described as quicker than expected. Comfort is generally viewed positively overall, though opinions vary, and steering feel is more mixed than the outright grip levels suggest.
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Very confident wet grip
- Secure, planted handling in the dry
- Comfortable ride over bumps and on longer runs
- Noticeable road noise, especially on coarse surfaces
- Tread life can be disappointing for a premium tire
- Steering feel/precision can be inconsistent (some find it vague)
Summarised by AI from 58 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 72 PremiumContact 7 reviewsThe PremiumContact 7 offers a great balance of touring longevity, comfort, and sufficiently precise handling to keep you safe at higher speeds and in unexpected situations. These tires provide near-perfect grip across various conditions, performing exceptionally well on both dry and wet roads. On the other hand, they can get a bit noisy on rough surfaces.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
- 85%from 130 reviews
- 81%would buy again
- 1,861,837 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners largely describe the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 as a quiet, very comfortable touring tire with standout longevity, reflected in the strong average score (81.1%) and the high share of positive reviews (90 of 113). Around four in ten owners specifically praise its tread life, and many also report confident dry and wet grip for everyday road use. The main reservation is that a noticeable minority (around one in five) find the steering feel a bit vague, and a smaller group mention a soft sidewall or occasional stability/feedback issues at speed.
- Low road noise for a touring tire
- Comfortable, supple ride over bumps and poor surfaces
- Excellent tread life and slow wear rate
- Strong dry grip with a safe, dependable feel
- Vague or less direct steering feel
- Soft sidewalls can feel imprecise or allow more movement in corners
- Wet braking can be underwhelming for some drivers
Summarised by AI from 113 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 130 EfficientGrip Performance 2 reviewsThe Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2’s were excellent. I like them so much that I’m onto my third pair across two cars. They improved my fuel efficiency significantly, were stubborn to wear away, all while providing reassuring grip whatever the weather. I’d driven over 40k miles on this set and have only just replaced them due to shoulder wear from needing an alignment. No doubt they’d have lasted over 50k miles otherwise! They’re not a budget tire but you soon recoup the added purchase cost through not having to replace as frequently and saving on fuel.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 56 sizes of the PremiumContact 7 and 37 of the EfficientGrip Performance 2, 16 of them made in both.
| Category | PremiumContact 7 | EfficientGrip Performance 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 56 sizes, 16 to 21 inch | 37 sizes, 15 to 21 inch |
| Made in both | 16 sizes 205/55 R16205/60 R16215/60 R16215/65 R16205/55 R17215/50 R17215/55 R17215/60 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17215/50 R18and 4 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A100% | A88%B12% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C74%B26% | A53%B34%C13% |
| EU label noise | 71-73 dB B100% | 67-71 dB B52%A48% |
| On the market since | 2022 | - |
| Replaced | Continental Premium Contact 6 | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance (2021) |
| Awards | Recommended: Best Tires for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Summer Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2024) | Highly Recommended: Best Tires for Large Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Commended: Best Tires for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2024/25) Winner: Summer Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2022) |
| Price in the shared tests | The PremiumContact 7 was the dearer tire in 3 of the 4 tests that listed prices, by 3% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Continental's PremiumContact 7 and Goodyear's EfficientGrip Performance 2 sit in the same “premium touring summer” bracket, but the test data shows they're tuned for slightly different priorities. Across seven shared comparative tests (ADAC, AutoBild, Motor and Tire Reviews), the Continental repeatedly targets outright safety and control-especially in the wet-while the Goodyear's headline is longevity, refinement and running-cost focus.
What makes this comparison particularly clear-cut is the consistency: the PremiumContact 7 outplaces the EfficientGrip Performance 2 in every shared overall ranking (including multiple #1 finishes), driven mainly by stronger braking and higher-limit handling. The Goodyear, however, keeps fighting back where real-world ownership can matter most: mileage/wear, noise/comfort, and frequently rolling resistance/value.
PremiumContact 7 vs EfficientGrip Performance 2: your questions
Is the Continental PremiumContact 7 or the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 the better tire?
In the 9 independent tests that ran both tires, the Continental PremiumContact 7 finished ahead 9 times and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the PremiumContact 7 scores 9.5 and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 9 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the PremiumContact 7 or the EfficientGrip Performance 2?
The PremiumContact 7 led 21 of the 28 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 9.8% shorter in the wet across 8 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The PremiumContact 7 led 13 of the 13 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.9% shorter in the dry across 8 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 lasted 16.1% longer in the wear tests (5 tests), had 5% lower rolling resistance (5 tests) and shed 14.3% less rubber in the abrasion test (3 tests). Owners rate wear 7.3/10 for the PremiumContact 7 and 9.1/10 for the EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The EfficientGrip Performance 2 was 1 dB quieter (5 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.5/10 for the PremiumContact 7 and 8.5/10 for the EfficientGrip Performance 2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the PremiumContact 7 83% from 72 reviews and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 85% from 130. 74% of PremiumContact 7 owners would buy it again, against 81% for the EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Which is more expensive?
In the 4 tests that listed prices, the PremiumContact 7 was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 3% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The PremiumContact 7 is made in 56 sizes (16 to 21 inch) and the EfficientGrip Performance 2 in 37 (15 to 21 inch). 16 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the PremiumContact 7 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the EfficientGrip Performance 2 A and A.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Michelin Primacy 5
9-2 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Continental PremiumContact 7
0-15 in 15 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
7-4 in 11 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
11-0 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
2-5 in 7 shared tests
Every Continental vs Goodyear test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the PremiumContact 7 Review the EfficientGrip Performance 2
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion