Menu
Bridgestone Alenza 001 View Gallery (1)
215-315/35-65 R16-22 240 sizes 2016

Bridgestone Alenza 001

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 is a Premium Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
79%
Wet Grip
72%
Road Feedback
66%
Handling
71%
Wear
67%
Comfort
58%
Buy again
39%
40 Reviews
65% Average
610,850 miles driven
Bridgestone Alenza 001

Bridgestone Alenza 001

Summer Premium
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 40
Avg Rating: 64.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Bridgestone Alenza 001

Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
235/65 R17 108 V XL C B 72
225/60 R17 99 V C B 71
225/60 R17 99 V A C 71
225/60R17 99 V C B 71
18 inch
235/60 R18 103 W C B 71
235/60 R18 107 W XL B B 73
235/60 R18 103 H B B 71
235/60 R18 103 H A A 67
235/60R18 103 H A A 67
235/60 R18 103 H B B 71
235/60 R18 103 H A A 67
235/60R18 107 W XL B B 72
235/60 R18 103 W C B 71
235/60R18 103 H A A 67
235/60R18 103 H B A 70
235/60R18 103 H A A 67
20 inch
275/55 R20 113 V C B 72
255/45 R20 101 W D A 72
275/55 R20 113 V C B 72
255/45 R20 101 W B B 71
255/45R20 101 W D A 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Bridgestone Alenza 001 >>

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Alenza 001

Ask a question
October 23, 2022

Hi, my 2022 X3 came with the Bridgestone Alenza much to my disappointment. Why did BMW elect to use what appears to be an unusual tire size of 245/50/19? Was it to provide Bridgestone with an advantage of corning that particular tire size? In that size, there really is limited other options, and nothing in an all season OEM spec, yet in the US they seem to much greater choice, especially for all seasons.

Vehicle manufacturers select their tire sizes based on many factors, at a guess this rather narrow tire will be to improve the rolling resistance for the co2 rating, but naturally it gives the OE tire manufactures an advantage when selling replacement tires too.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
235/55 R18 $371.99 - $371.99 (2 Prices) Compare Prices >>
245/50 R19 $149.99 - $238.99 (3 Prices) Compare Prices >>
275/35 R21 $508.96 - $508.96 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 21 tire sizes - View all.

Review Summary

Based on 37 user reviews

Driver feedback on the Bridgestone Alenza 001 is mixed overall, with many describing it as an acceptable OEM touring tire but not a standout for the price. Higher-scoring reviews often praise its secure, predictable on-road handling with decent dry/wet grip and good motorway stability, and some drivers report strong longevity. However, a large portion of users complain about high noise levels and a harsh, vibration-prone ride (especially with run-flat versions), along with frequent reports of fast or uneven wear and reduced wet traction/traction when pushed.

Strengths
  • Stable
  • Predictable on-road handling (touring-focused)
  • Generally good dry performance and overall grip for normal driving
  • Some owners report long tread life/high mileage in certain applications
Areas for Improvement
  • High road noise (often worsens as the tire wears)
  • Harsh ride/road vibration and reduced comfort (notably on run-flat fitments)
  • Reports of fast or uneven wear/short tread life for many drivers
  • Wet traction/launch traction can be weak
  • With slipping or reduced confidence when pushed

Top 3 Bridgestone Alenza 001 Reviews

Given 41% while driving a Mercedes Benz GL450 (275/55 R19) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
It’s a RFT !!! It’s not good to use a Mercedes gl ! It’s not for this suspension. Run flat tires ? I don’t know what for is that tires . All rft not recommended!!!
July 15, 2025
Given 81% while driving a Lexus UX (225/50 R18) on mostly motorways for 35,000 average miles
The tires came as standard on my Lexus UX250H in 2023. Now, after 55k/km, they still have 5mm treads. So they do last, but the drawback is the noise they produce as they are RFT. Now I'm looking for something quieter, as most of my kilometres are completed on the Motorway and at high speeds; the noise is important. If I were driving at low speeds up to 60km/h and a hint of a motorway, I would definitely stick to these tires as they perform exceptionally well in both dry and wet conditions, especially here in Ireland, with no extreme low temperatures or snow these are right on spot for city commuting.
July 3, 2025
Given 53% while driving a BMW X3m40i (245/40 R21) on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
The Bridgestone Alenza RFT in 245/40R21 front and 275/35R21 rear is a very average tire. It’s okay but not great. Grip is acceptable in dry conditions, but in the wet it can slip when pushed, although the AWD system helps manage it. Ride comfort is harsh, with noticeable thumping over bumps and poor handling of rough roads. This is typical of run-flats, but still disappointing at this price point. Feedback and progression near the grip limit are minimal, making spirited driving feel numb.

Wear has been reasonable. After around 40,000 km, the fronts have about 5 mm of tread left while the rears are down to 2 mm. The front tires show noticeable outer edge wear, likely from SUV weight transfer during cornering. Running higher-than-recommended front pressures helps mitigate this.

Overall, it’s an expensive tire with no standout qualities. The limited run-flat alternatives in this size make that more frustrating.
August 5, 2025

How would you rate the Bridgestone Alenza 001?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Bridgestone Alenza 001 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 76% while driving a (255/50 R20) on for 1,000 miles
The original goodyear F1 Asymmetric 3, which had been driven for 16,000 kilometers, got a sidewall punctured after hitting a rock on a mountain road. With no other option in a remote area, I had to install the Bridgestone A001, which was originally equipped on the Li L6.

Now I've driven about 1,200 miles, mostly on paved urban roads. I feel the dry grip is slightly better than the Bridgestone, but both are acceptable, and there's no significant difference.

The downside is that the noise has increased, and more road vibrations are transmitted through the steering wheel, which reduces comfort. Also, the rolling resistance has increased, raising energy consumption by 1 kWh per 100 kilometers.

Overall, considering the price, I think it's still usable. For the next replacement, I hope to switch to a more comfortable and energy-efficient model. I've heard that Wanli e01 is well done, and I'd like to try it if the opportunity arises.
February 6, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 63% while driving a BMW X3 30e (245/50 R19) on for 14,000 miles
OEM tires on a BMW X3. Ok performance in dry and wet conditions. Let down by poor tire wear characteristics and vague handling.
February 5, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 88% while driving a BMW IX3 (245/45 R20) on mostly country roads for 1,000 average miles
Funny how specific tires seem to be made for specific cars. Bridgestone Alenza 001 (non run flat!) feel way better than Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 under my BMW iX3. Far more comfortable and silent and good grip.
December 29, 2025
Given 42% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (255/55 R19) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
very very noisy on 2023 Toyota Rav 4 and a rough ride. quicker I get rid of them the better. I have had Goodyear efficiency grip suv on a previous 2021 Rav 4 and they are superb.
Unfortunately these Bridgestone tires were on the car from new and the car has only done 8000 miles.
October 26, 2025
Given 57% while driving a Lexus NX 450h+ (225/50 R20) on mostly motorways for 36,000 average miles
Wearing well after 36k, should hit 50k (RFT). Major issue is noise at low speeds, horrendous. Had car back in garage twice believing it was brakes/bearings, but no - tire noise. Would never buy again.
October 11, 2025
Given 59% while driving a Mazda CX 5 (225/65 R17) on mostly town for 21,000 easy going miles
I bought these almost exactly 3 years ago (less than 35,000kms driven) and I just had a slow puncture which in itself isn't out of the ordinary. However, the tire repairer thought they looked 5 years old from the wear and cracks. He pointed out the side walls were getting dry and cracked so even though there's probably 1 year left of tread, the rest of the tire itself is showing the need for replacement.

Those were an upgrade from the good years I had on before, in terms of handling and road noise (Mazda CX5s are notorious for that) but I'm definitely disappointed in their longevity. Now looking at Pirelli Scorpions.
October 4, 2025
Given 37% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (235/55 R19) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
The Alenza 001 were fitted to my new RAV4, I really don't like these tires.

Poor feedback and grip in all weathers, plus they seem to understeer quite badly.
September 18, 2025
Given 22% while driving a Mazda CX 60 (235/50 R20) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Main problem with above tires on my CX 60 is that all four tires are splitting on the walls and treads at junction corners both externally and internally facing the floor panel, this problem has existed within a few months of purchase when the vehicle was new, Mazda say there is nothing wrong with them and are safe to drive on, the car has done less than 10k miles in 3years but driven regularly. Mazda local dealer has offered to change the tires at my expense and send them to Bridgestone for inspection and testing and depending on results may partly compensate me !! So I have to spend nearly £800 to go through this process while the vehicle is under the Mazda warranty. Mazda UK have not been helpful at all in recognising the problem.
September 13, 2025
Given 69% while driving a Subaru Outback (225/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Subaru Outback Touring XT: For many years Subaru fitted Yokohama Geolanders to Outback and Forester, they being the best compromise for bitumen and gravel roads. Those cars are "all road" cars, pitched at people who did a lot of touring, bush adventuring and so on - "See You Out There". Alenza a much quieter, softer, better handling tire than Geolander on bitumen but poor performance on gravel. Subaru have surrendered to the city drivers? The adventurers now relegated to also-ran's? I am replacing my Alenzas with Pirelli Scorpion.
August 5, 2025
Given 47% while driving a Honda ZR V SPORT e:HEV (225/55 R18) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
Very noisy tire
May 16, 2025
Given 48% while driving a Mazda CX9 (255/50 R20) on a combination of roads for 650 easy going miles
I replaced the oem falknen ziex on my Mazda CX9 with Bridgestone Alenza s001. I won’t buy them again even though they cost just a third of the price of the Falkens. The Falkens were very comfortable, quiet and had excellent wet and dry grip. I have only done about 1000 km on the Alenzas Road noise is unbearable.They are very bumpy, although that could be because the installer inflated them to 38 psi rather than 33psi as recommended by Mazda. I reduced the pressure to 34 and they seem a little bit better now. Wet grip is poor.
April 8, 2025
Given 75% while driving a Honda ZR V SPORT e:HEV (225/55 R18) on mostly motorways for 0 easy going miles
Very Noisy TIre on My Honda ZRV 2023 - IN UAE
March 3, 2025
Rate the Bridgestone Alenza 001