Given
69%
while driving a
Honda CR Z
(225/45 R17) on
mostly motorways
for 1,000
easy going miles
I don't know why the tire is marked as UHP. it would probably fail my expectation for a UHP, but is impressive for a touring tire.
Noise level is decently low for a tire with such price, and it also provides nice bounce absorption to give you a comfort ride.
Rolling resistance is low and with the treadwear of 400, it is quite economic for prolonged usage.
Dry performance is more than acceptable regarding the above properties. However, the wet grip is just terrible when comparing to the dry grip.
My car just slid effortlessly on a slippy road when I turned with the speed I used to with my previous Nexen SU1, which is not one of the best tires on wet surfaces.
Bottom line, it is good for most drivers looking for comfort and low expenditure, but must be very careful when they are on a wet road.