Menu
Hifly HF805 View Gallery (2)
165-295/30-55 R15-21 95 sizes 2021

Hifly HF805

The Hifly HF805 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.4
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
74%
Wet Grip
61%
Road Feedback
65%
Handling
64%
Wear
54%
Comfort
63%
Buy again
51%
66 Reviews
62% Average
547,965 miles driven
4 Tests (avg: 28th)
Hifly HF805

Hifly HF805

Summer Budget
BETA
6.4 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Value
62.9
0.42x / 2 tests
Wet
49.3
2x / 5 tests
Dry
48.4
1.8x / 3 tests
Comfort
40
0.32x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
53.9
4 tests
Handling
40
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 4
Publications: 2
Period: 2014 - 2022
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 66
Avg Rating: 61.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.22
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2022 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 28/44 2 metrics
2021 ViBilagare Summer Tire Test Vi Bilagare 2021 225/45 R17 8/8 10 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Shootout Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 29/43 0 metrics
2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tire Shootout Auto Bild 2014 225/50 R17 45/50 0 metrics
4
Tests
28th
Average
8th
Best
45th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
28th/44
8th/8
Cheapest tire on test.
Very poor wet braking, low grip in all conditions, high noise and low levels of comfort.
29th/43
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
195/55R15 85 V D C 71
16 inch
205/55R16 94 W XL D C 72
205/55R16 94 W XL C C 72
205/55R16 94 W XL C C 72
205/55R16 94 W XL C C 72
205/55R16 94 W XL C C 72
205/55R16 94 W XL C C 72
205/55R16 94 W XL C C 72
17 inch
215/45R17 91 W XL D C 72
225/45R17 94 W XL D C 72
205/50R17 93 W XL D C 72
225/50R17 98 W XL D C 72
215/55R17 98 W XL D C 72
225/50R17 98 W XL C C 72
205/50R17 93 W XL C C 72
225/50R17 98 W XL C C 72
205/50R17 93 W XL C C 72
225/50R17 98 W XL C C 72
205/50R17 93 W XL C C 72
225/50R17 98 W XL C C 72
205/50R17 93 W XL C C 72
225/50R17 98 W XL C C 72
205/50R17 93 W XL C C 72
225/50R17 98 W XL C C 72
205/50R17 93 W XL C C 72
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 72
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 72
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 72
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 72
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 72
215/55R17 98 W XL C C 72
225/45R17 94 W XL C C 72
215/45R17 91 W XL C C 72
18 inch
225/40R18 92 W XL D C 72
245/40R18 97 W XL C C 72
245/40R18 97 W XL D C 72
245/45R18 100 W XL C C 72
245/45R18 100 W XL D C 72
255/35R18 94 W XL C C 73
255/35R18 94 W XL D C 73
225/40R18 92 W XL C C 72
225/40R18 92 W XL C C 72
225/40R18 92 W XL C C 72
225/40R18 92 W XL C C 72
225/40R18 92 W XL C C 72
225/40R18 92 W XL C C 72
19 inch
235/35R19 91 W XL C C 72
235/35R19 91 W XL D C 72
20 inch
245/35R20 95 W XL C C 72
245/35R20 95 W XL D C 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hifly HF805 >>

Questions and Answers for the Hifly HF805

Ask a question
March 18, 2018

235/40 R18 Challenger DSRT`s on a 2008 Mondeo 2.0 petrol.. What`s the correct tire pressure? Have tried 28 psi front and 32 psi Front ( as recommended by Ford ) and none of these pressures give correct wear. Always end up with excessive wear in the center of tread?

Tire pressures are manufacturer dependant, so the correct tire pressure is set by the vehicle manufacturer. That said, centre tread wear usually indicates overinflation.
October 24, 2019

Is the Hifly HF805 tire suitable for gravel roads, all terrain?

The HF805 is a summer tire, so while it can be used lightly on gravel, it is not recommended to fit it if you'll spend a lot of time off road.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 63 user reviews

Drivers' experiences with the Hifly HF805 are mixed-to-negative overall. Many praise its low price, decent dry grip, acceptable comfort/noise, and in some cases good stability at speed, but a large share report poor wet grip and very fast/uneven wear. Multiple users also cite weak sidewalls/structural issues and pressure loss, making it a risky choice for wet climates or heavier vehicles. The HF805 can suit budget-focused drivers prioritizing dry performance, but wet safety and longevity are recurring concerns.

Strengths
  • Low price/value
  • Good dry grip
  • Stable/high-speed performance
  • Acceptable comfort/noise for price
Areas for Improvement
  • Poor wet grip and longer wet stopping distances
  • Fast tread wear/low longevity
  • Weak sidewalls/structural issues (blistering
  • Cracking
  • Delamination)
  • Air pressure loss
  • Noise for some users

Top 3 Hifly HF805 Reviews

Given 51% while driving a Lexus IS250 RWD (255/35 R18) on mostly town for 14,000 spirited miles
I’ve been using the Hifly HF805 tires on my Lexus IS250, and while they offer reasonable performance for a budget tire, there are some clear trade-offs. Grip levels are decent in both dry and wet conditions—nothing exceptional, but enough to feel safe for everyday driving. Road noise and comfort are also acceptable.

That said, the downsides are hard to ignore. The most noticeable issue has been how quickly these tires wear down. Tread life is significantly shorter than expected. I have only done just over 20,000 km on these tires, and the treads have dropped to just above the legal minimums. I would have normally put this down to my more spirited driving, but the front tires have worn away just as quickly as the rears. In addition, I’ve noticed that they tend to lose air pressure faster than normal. I’ve had to top them up more frequently than I would with other brands, which can be a hassle as the tire pressure light is almost always on.
June 10, 2025
Given 57% while driving a Volkswagen Transporter (255/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 20,000 average miles
They were fitted to my coach converted VW T6 on collection, and lasted 20,000 and four and a half years before really bad wear and splitting on tires walls. They are a budget tire and you get what you pay for. I've replaced them with Royal Black Royal Explorer II's, again a budget tire but I only do 4,500 miles a year.
August 7, 2025
Given 34% while driving a BMW 118i Sport (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 100 average miles
Had these fitted onto my BMW 1 series less than a month ago, tires were fine while bedding in for a week but now they're awful and wish i never bought them. Firstly my 1 series is only the 1.5 engine and i'm not a boy racer but even i wheel spin all the time with zero effort even just pulling out of my jobs car park it wheel spins due to poor grip.

Road noise isn't too bad but when your in a car with TC on and drift sidewards or wheelspin pulling out junctions when your not even tying this tells you the tires are awful! already paying for them to be taken off and replaced as its unbearable, some find it fun but for me its scary when your sliding and god knows how bad these would be with TC turned off i would probably wheel spin on same spot for a hour before moving.
February 3, 2025

How would you rate the Hifly HF805?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hifly HF805 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 94% while driving a Mazda 3 Series (225/45 R17) on for 30,000 miles
Good tires for the price. Noise level acceptable. Budget tires. As good as the oem tires.
February 24, 2026
Given 34% while driving a Alfa Romeo 1.9 JTD M (235/40 R19) on mostly country roads for 5,000 average miles
bad
March 13, 2025
Given 40% while driving a Skoda Octavia vRS (235/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 2,500 average miles
Both tires developed large swelling/ blisters- I initially thought it was wheel bearing noise! Garage showed me how lucky I was to not have them blow on me - never again/ don’t wast you money/ put yourself at risk
December 16, 2024
Given 87% while driving a Mercedes Benz 190 2.3 16 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
These were new on a 2010 Mercedes C300 I purchased. This is my ‘everyday’ car. They have served me well, and whilst in the wet they won’t grip as well, now that they have worn down close to war blocks, any normal sane person wouldn’t be pushing their car to the limit anyway. Plus other brand tires never perform the same when close to wear limit either.
I push this car hard going over the Kaimai Range to Tauranga, and have been impressed with how well they handle. No squealing!
They have lasted just on two years, with the rears now close to the wear blocks and the front still have 2-3 ml left. They have never been rotated front to back. These tires have travelled 18,000 odd kilometres. I am buying another set to replace these. I do have a preference for Michelin tires, have them on my V8 Mercedes, but the price and overall driveability of these Hifly HF 805’s have led me to buy another set.
September 23, 2024
Given 56% while driving a Peugeot 508 SW 1.5 HDI GT LINE (235/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 25,000 average miles
These tires came with an used 2012 Peugeot 508 SW GT Line with relatively low mileage on them (I think less than 25000KM). The front tires I put new Michelin Pilot Sport 5, and these HiFly HF805 my tire shop recommended to put on the rear until I am ready to get matching Michelin tires. I drive short distance in the city and about 25-30KM on the highway regularly to commute and these tires are comfortable and handle well on dry roads. They also handle well even in heavy rain as long as I don't try to curve suddenly over 30KM/h. On dry road, my car can do a sharp curve with these tires at 50KM/h without losing control. However, on wet road, at 50KM/h the car started to look rear grip, swaying left and right strongly before I regained control. So I learned not to exceed 35KM/h on wet road when cornering. They did well on long distance driving, even at 150KM/h, without any instability. However, recently my car began to show a warning of low tire pressure on on side. I checked the tire pressure and it was a bit low, and I inflated all the tires to the correct level. However, less than a week later, the car showed a warning that the tire on the other side may be punctured or flat. I checked the other tire and it was a bit low but not flat. Fortunately I live close to a trusted tire shop and I took my car there. Initially we suspected it may be due to a nail puncture. However, as you can see in the photo, once he removed a tire, from the inner side, there are two visible crack on the sidewall! After he removed the other tire, it showed even a bigger crack on the inner side. I had been driving for most of my life and the many tires I used never exhibited such symptom. The cracks weakened the structural integrity of these tires and it will be a matter of them before they shred under high speed driving. I was lucky to have caught this in time.

Since my car has 19-inch wheels, good tires don't come cheap. I understand the reason why the previous owner put these on. They are less than 80 euros each, compared to say some mid-level brand like Nexgen which still cost 150 euros each. What I ended up replacing them is Michelin Pilot Sport 5, and they cost 220 euros each! But they can corner with no problem at 50km/h on wet road without causing the car to sway like a fishtail. They are also not going to have cracked sidewalls after 25000KM of driving.
August 25, 2024
Given 81% while driving a Mercedes Benz 300ce (245/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 33,000 average miles
Mercedes 300 on when car purchased 2 years ago, they are nearly three years old. Fine tires.
March 9, 2024
Given 47% while driving a Holden 2007 COMMODORE BERLINA 6.0l (245/35 R19) on mostly motorways for 20,000 easy going miles
Had theses tires on my weekend car holden vz v8 handled ok for cheap tires but have weak sidewall so wouldn't purchase again after getting on motorway noticed a noise got off motorway and tire was loosing air fast
August 3, 2023
Given 71% while driving a Holden 2017 SSV redline station wagon (275/30 R20) on mostly town for 0 average miles
Not sure yet haven’t had a them, long but have had trouble with one tire but they replaced it
March 25, 2023
Given 39% while driving a Volkswagen Caddy maxi 200bhp (235/35 R19) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
These tires would be acceptable if we never got rain……. as in 365 days of dry weather! In the wet they are dangerous!! Uneven damp roads they are dangerous! I would never want to attempt emergency braking in the wet with these. Dry grip is ok but the comfort is rubbish and the side wall offers absolutely no rim protection. These tires came with the brand new alloys that came with the van- so not sure who exactly bought them, either the alloy manufacturer or the dealer I bought the van from- either way it’s obviously because they are cheap. I’ve replaced these with Michelin crossclimate- far superior and worth the extra cost.
July 8, 2022
Given 46% while driving a Audi A7 3.0 TFSI (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 15,000 average miles
This tires are risky. First, no rim protection, at all. So any accidental curb touches leave their mark Handling is atrocious. The tires kept pulling the steering wheel any which way depending on road conditions Very weak sidewall. I ran some rumble strips at speed and shredded two tires. Road noise, better amp your radio Wet handling is really bad. Only positive us that they seem to have good tread even after 15000kms
June 15, 2022
Given 37% while driving a Suzuki swift sport (205/50 R17) on mostly country roads for 600 average miles
These were fitted just before we picked up my wifes Suzuki Swift Sport. After 350k's of highway use I had to emergency brake due to a car pulling out in front of me, t-boned them. ABS tried but the grip was virtually non-existent. Had the car repaired and after 1000k's I'm replacing them as they are not a good tire at all. The grip is not great in either wet or dry and they ride rough. Also seeing out edge wear even though the wife doesn't drive like a looney. Yes, alignment has been checked and it's fine. Seriously, don't buy these, spend a bit extra and get decent tires.
July 26, 2021
Given 36% while driving a Alfa Romeo brera (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Sorry but very very bad grip and handling on dry . Uncomfy as well .
July 20, 2021
Rate the Hifly HF805