Nexen N Fera Primus

The Nexen N Fera Primus is a Premium Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tire review data from 7 tire reviews averaging 81% over 31,547 miles driven, and 6 tests with an average result of 12th.

Dry Grip 88%
Wet Grip 94%
Road Feedback 86%
Handling 72%
Wear 77%
Comfort 77%
Buy again 75%

First On MarketSeptember 2020
Wheel Size15 - 19"
Width185 - 245mm
Profile40 - 65
Rolling ResistanceA - D
Wet GripA - C
Noise (dB)69 - 72
Winter RatingNot Winter Rated

The N Fera Primus is ranked 38th of 152 Summer Premium Touring tires.

Tests Included

6

Best Result

10th

Worst Result

17th

Average Result

12th

Latest Tire Test Results

2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test
11th of 16 tires
  • The Nexen N'Fera Primus receives a satisfactory rating in driving safety, failing to achieve a good rating in both dry and wet conditions. On dry roads, it provides barely satisfactory steering feedback and does not surpass a satisfactory rating in handling at the limit. A lack of precise steering feedback makes it challenging to accurately adjust the steering angle for curves, leading to a tendency for the vehicle to oversteer during sudden evasion maneuvers. However, the tire achieves a clearly good rating in braking distance. On wet surfaces, the N'Fera Primus secures good ratings in braking distance measurements and lateral aquaplaning but only achieves satisfactory results in longitudinal aquaplaning and handling, preventing a good overall rating in wet performance. Environmentally, the Nexen narrowly misses a good rating, with its projected mileage, noise, and sustainability rated as just satisfactory, while its wear and efficiency are rated as good.
View Full Test >>
2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test
17th of 21 tires
  • Good braking performance, dynamic wet handling.
  • Delayed steering response, limited tread life/economic efficiency.
  • Satisfactory.
View Full Test >>

2024 Tire Tests

2023 Tire Tests

2022 Tire Tests

SizeFuelWetNoise
15 inch
195/65R15 91 VDB71
185/65R15 88 HDA70
195/65R15 95 H XLAB72
16 inch
205/60R16 96 H XLAB72
205/55R16 91 VDA71
17 inch
225/50R17 98 V XLDA71
215/55R17 94 VCB70
215/55R17 94 WAA71
225/50R17 94 VDA71
225/60R17 99 HCB71
205/50R17 93 V XLCB72
225/60R17 99 VCB71
225/45R17 91 WBA71
215/55R17 94 WAA71
18 inch
245/45R18 96 WBB71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nexen N Fera Primus >>

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nexen N Fera Primus. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!

Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top 3 Nexen N Fera Primus Reviews

Given 66% while driving a Renault Clio II 1.2 16v (195/45 R16) on mostly town for 100 easy going miles
i fitted these tires a week ago. my braking became worst than the falkens i had fitted (ziex 914 , 185/60R14) . I will get back to report wear and wet performance. keep in mind that they are noisy no matter the km/h 50 or 150....
Helpful 85 - tire reviewed on September 27, 2021
Given 76% while driving a Opel Signum 2.2 DTi (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
They seems to have a bit longer breaking distance than Falkens and they feel softer. They stay soft even if the preasure is bigger than required. Comfortable.
Helpful 34 - tire reviewed on May 1, 2023
Given 95% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 easy going miles
Bought those tires to replace a set of Michelin Primacy 3s that came new with the car. These are also XL tires. Price was very decent. 51€ per tire. After installing the tires car felt immediately smoother and softer. Also quiet. Michelins were quite hard, crashy and made unbearable noise. Now going over bumps does not make me flinch any more. Also, gone is the tramlining effect old tires had. Any imperfections in the road were directly translated to my steering wheel being yanked left and right. No more. Grip is magnificent, braking feels confident and smooth. Even saw some snow with them. No problem at all. Since this is an initial review and I have not gathered a lot of miles with them, I can't say much about wear. Initial tread depth was 7mm. I measured. Fuel economy feels unchanged.
Helpful 41 - tire reviewed on April 13, 2021
Have you driven on the Nexen N Fera Primus tire?

Have YOU got experience with the Nexen N Fera Primus? Help millions of other tire buyers

Review your Nexen N Fera Primus >

Latest Nexen N Fera Primus Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Volkswagen Polo BlueGT 6R (215/40 R17) on mostly country roads for 15,000 spirited miles
The best tire I've had so far. The grip on any surface is fantastic. Czech Republic production, very much a plus for this company. One thing I can only complain about is the very low tread, and from what I've noticed they wear down quite quickly. The price is also fantastic for such a quality tire.
Helpful 0 - tire reviewed on November 12, 2024
Given 76% while driving a Renault Clio II 1.2 16v (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
after 2 months of installation in the clio ii 12 16v i have to say that i am AMAZED about their wet performance, specially while braking. a little bit more noisy than the falkens i used to have but bearable.
Helpful 32 - tire reviewed on November 29, 2021
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 99% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,447 easy going miles
Second review to complement my first review of those tires. The summer season has passed and I have replaced summer tires with winter tires. Everything said in my first review stands - the tires are very good. Magnificent grip, confidence inspiring and no surprises. Quiet, comfortable etc. I have more information about fuel consumption - they are worse compared to Michelin. Although my driving profile has changed a bit, I've done more city driving and less long distance, average fuel consumption has increased since Nexen tires were installed. Wear is great - after the summer season I measured 6.5 and 6.2mm tread left on rear and front tires. Initial tread depth was 7mm. With this rate of wear, these could easily go 50 000+ kilometres. Please note, my stated mileage in this review is not miles but kilometres. I ran the tires on 2.4bar cold pressure since car's recommended 2.2bar felt a bit soft and wobbly. 2.4 and above and they are great.
Helpful 28 - tire reviewed on October 25, 2021
Mazda (195/45 R16) on mostly town for 4,000 spirited miles
I upgraded to 16 inches wheels and I was shopping for tires for my mazda 2 which is a very light car, so the XL rating it's a bit overkill for it and this affects comfort adding more sensitivity to every small imperfection of the road already compromised from the lower sidewall height. The tire itself it's very advisable for the car because the significant dry grip and cornering precision, being ligher than the stock one and having a better fuel economy rating i kept the unsprung masses almost identical (but measuring from a completely worn tire!). The feedback from the road at the limit is excellent in dry, lower and noticiable on wet, but never unsafe. Talking about wet grip and hydroplaning resistance i've owned better tires, I run the tire pressure 2 psi higher than what mazda advises tbh (for my suspensions going under 34 front and 32 rear causes a reduction in comfort), and the context of use it's not always ideal (11 degrees °C or lower) and maybe for this even with an underpowered car like mine I can slip at startup sometimes. When the wheather is hot they heat up very quickly and the pressure rises a lot, lowering comfort , increasing noise and reducing the contact patch resulting in dangerous longer braking distance. But all of this recovers if you study the right pressure for you needs which is nor the one on the door sticker, neither the one from the manufacturer.
Helpful 38 - tire reviewed on April 13, 2021