Pace Toledo TL1000

The Pace Toledo TL1000 is a Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Tire review data from 15 tire reviews averaging 62% over 114,900 miles driven.

Dry Grip 73%
Wet Grip 56%
Road Feedback 63%
Handling 61%
Wear 69%
Comfort 61%
Buy again 53%

The Toledo TL1000 is ranked 142nd of 238 Summer Touring tires.

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Pace Toledo TL1000

Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Pace Toledo TL1000

Questions and Answers for the Pace Toledo TL1000

2019-01-12 - Are these TL1000X tires bi directional or directional? Recently fitted the curve groove on the offside is the opposite to the near side?

The TL1000 is an asymmetric tire, so bi-directional


Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

capatha

To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


Top 3 Pace Toledo TL1000 Reviews

Given 96% while driving a Volkswagen Polo 6N (185/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Came fitted on my used VW Polo 1.0se. They lasted 10000 miles and still had 2 to 3mm left. Never let me down in Scottish weather not even a squeel, even with some spirited driving when alone in the car. Very impressive for a budget tire only changed to a premium tire for passenger safety and insurance worries. Good product.
Helpful 33 - tire reviewed on February 11, 2023
Given 46% while driving a Mazda MX5 (185/60 R14 H) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
Came fitted fairly fresh on the front of a used MX5 MK1 I bought last year and I thought I'd run them through to the end of their life (the rear had similar mileage Uniroyal RainSport 3s fitted).

Pros:
- The wear level appears fairly low likely due to the hardness of the tire compound. I'd expect mid to high 10k miles on a low power lightweight car with average driving.
- Decent straight line aquaplaning resistance, 70mph on motorways in the really wet without feeling too light on the steering

Cons:
- In the dry they are below average on nearly all handling remarks - squealing every time they get the chance
- In the wet it is questionable whether I'd be better off just running on the rim; my wideboy track semi-slicks are grippier and they're made from materials that are inherently afraid of water
- When fitted to the front they would under-steer minutes before the rear at hilariously low speeds and when fitted to the rear the car would turn into a spinning top

Summary:
I've never driven a car where the grip balance between the front and rear has been so hilariously different. I would strongly avoid these tires if you live anywhere where the ground gets a little more than moist and strongly recommend that you spend that extra few quid getting a tried and tested tire.
Helpful 58 - tire reviewed on November 16, 2019
Given 70% while driving a Toyota Avensis estate 1.8 petrol (215/55 R17 W) on mostly town for 4,000 average miles
This review is for Toledo TL1000 tires 215/55ZR17 98W XL from SD International.
http://www.sd-international.cn/products/Toledo_pcr.html . I got my Toyota Avensis 1.8 CVT Estate second hand (ex Europe car hire car) and it had a pair of these on the front. Not knowing that much about tires at the time I decided to put the same on the rear which had been the OEM Dunlop Efficient grip. At the point the car had done 42K miles. We mostly drive in London with the occasional long trip. For the price of around £40 a tire you can't fault them. I can't do a direct comparison to other tires on the same car but the wet grip and dry grip in warmer weather is very good. When it drops below 10C the tires tend to harden up and being XL tires and seemingly a hard wearing compound (7mm still on the rear after 4k miles) that probably isn't surprising. You are definitely going to get a bit better handling, comfort and safety with a £100+ tire but I don't think you will find much more durability.
Helpful 76 - tire reviewed on December 17, 2017
Have you driven on the Pace Toledo TL1000 tire?

Have YOU got experience with the Pace Toledo TL1000? Help millions of other tire buyers

Review your Pace Toledo TL1000 >

Latest Pace Toledo TL1000 Reviews

Given 46% while driving a Hyundai i30 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 7,000 easy going miles
Bought car used with these tires, fairly new at the time. Dry handling is sort of ok, with a lot of squealing if pushed. Wet handling can be scary. Feels more like driving on oil or ice at times. Excessive wear, driven mostly on highway. If you value your (and your family's) life, stay away from this junk. There is a reason premium tires cost more.
Helpful 0 - tire reviewed on October 10, 2024
Given 94% while driving a Audi A6 Avant 2.0TDI (255/35 R19) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
But this tire as a cheap replacement for a 14-year-old Audi A6 Avant. Have to say I was pleasantly surprised by how good they are. They are very quiet and very smooth but the one thing that is very impressive is the grip it’s just never ending. Don’t be afraid of the name they are a very good tire choice
Helpful 7 - tire reviewed on April 30, 2024
What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
Given 70% while driving a Audi A2 (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Had these tires fitted on my mums car, she doesn’t drive fast or hard so they’re been pretty much perfect as they’re long lasting. Last set of TL1000s lasted about 30,000 on the front and rears were still at 4-5mm. I am a keen driver myself (track experience ect in my own cars ) and at first I was a little put off by the low scores of the tires, however when driving on them they were surprisingly good. The car grips well in the dry and handles ok. On back roads they make the little A2 quite a competent car and I have upset faster cars through the corners. Temperature is a big factor with these tires, colder outside temperatures the performance drops of significantly. In the wet they’re not as good, but in such a low power car they’re not too overwhelmed. I haven’t driven fast in the wet so I couldn’t comment on their performance with speed in wet conditions. Overall surprisingly good given their low ratings, but are never going to compare to premium tires.
Helpful 36 - tire reviewed on July 30, 2020
Given 79% while driving a Ford Fiesta 2009 titanium 1.4 (195/45 R16) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
Have had them fitted to my diesel fiesta for 4 years. Do motorway miles and they wear really well. Normally get 25K per set.
Good value for what they are.
Helpful 42 - tire reviewed on February 11, 2020
Given 37% while driving a Volkswagen Golf MK7 R 300 BHP (235/35 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
Tires came with a set of alloys I bought, they had quite a lot of tread left on them so figured why not use them until they're worn down. Fine in the dry but show them some rain and they let go very easily, two lots of understeering at relatively slow speeds on roundabouts later and they're getting replaced. Will maybe keep them as back ups for the summer but definitely not for wet weather or winter driving.
Helpful 44 - tire reviewed on September 24, 2019
Given 20% while driving a Vauxhall Insignia 2.0 CDTi SE sport (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
I would recommend avoiding this tires. They come on a car that I bought and I did not know the brand. On the dry road they are just ok but whe it is raining they are dangerous. I have almost done a U turn while rounding a roundabout in the rain as the car lost control even at a low speed. I went to replace them and the garage told me these are one of the cheapest brands available. I'd recommend to spend a few £ more for something a little better.
Helpful 39 - tire reviewed on July 16, 2019
Given 64% while driving a Peugeot 306 HDI (195/55 R15) on mostly country roads for 12,000 average miles
Found grip wet and dry to be good. Fairly quiet tire too, only downside is they only lasted 12,000 miles and driven sensibly... so based on quick wear won't be buying again..
Helpful 53 - tire reviewed on April 8, 2019
Given 71% while driving a Ford c max (225/40 R18) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
Good tire, cheap enough, have a set of 4 on my car and it handles great but I have lowered the car.
Helpful 46 - tire reviewed on December 26, 2018
Given 49% while driving a BMW 520d (225/50 R17 W) on mostly motorways for 20,000 spirited miles
Avoid these tires. They are absolutely awful in the wet, I’d go so far as to say unsafe. I cannot trust the car at all in the wet. I have these on the front, fitted by the previous owner. They still have around 6mm of tread left after >20k miles, so they are extremely durable but that’s only a good quality if they provide you with decent grip! I noted the speed these stopped gripping on a wet roundabout the other day: just over 20mph with a fairly gentle lateral load.
In fairness to them, the dry grip is not terrible, just a little spongey and feedback is fairly numb. Noise is reasonable but that might be more about the car than the tire.
Despite having so much tread left, I will be replacing these soon for something that I can actually rely on in poor conditions - well worth £100+ a tire in my view.
Helpful 42 - tire reviewed on November 4, 2018
Vauxhall (225/45 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 10,500 spirited miles
Wet and dry grip are excellent for a budget tire. Also very acceptable levels of road noise. However, on my Astra GTC the front pair are nearing replacement at just under 11000 miles, so not wearing well.
Helpful 44 - tire reviewed on October 27, 2018