Menu

Vredestein Quatrac Lite

The Vredestein Quatrac Lite is a High Performance All Season tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.4
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
86%
Wet Grip
87%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
81%
Wear
86%
Comfort
87%
Buy again
83%
7 Reviews
84% Average
29,500 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 6th)
Vredestein Quatrac Lite

Vredestein Quatrac Lite

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
6.4 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 3
Period: 2012 - 2014
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 84.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.56
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2014 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2014 205/55 R16 9/10 0 metrics
2014 All Season Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2014 185/60 R15 3/10 0 metrics
2012 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test Auto Bild 2012 175/65 R14 5/10 0 metrics
3
Tests
6th
Average
3rd
Best
9th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2014 All Season Tire Test
185/60 R15 • 2014
3rd/10
The dry specialist with a low rolling resistance. Precise dynamic handling and short braking distances on dry roads, quiet, good comfort
Slight aquaplaning weakness
9th/10
Seven per cent off the best winter tire in the snow, better than the best winter tire in the dry, and again 7% behind the best winter in the cold wet test, but 10% ahead of the summer tire
5th/10
Safe handling qualities with stable turning and good feedback on a wet track, short dry braking distances and lowest rolling resistance in the test
Average on snow, poor aquaplaning result

Alternative Tires

8.3/10
80% 38 reviews
7.6/10
78% 13 reviews
7.1/10
82% 5 reviews
6.7/10
83% 32 reviews
6.3/10
83% 5 reviews
5.6/10
79% 48 reviews
80% 4 reviews

Questions and Answers for the Vredestein Quatrac Lite

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Vredestein Quatrac Lite. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Vredestein Quatrac Lite Reviews

Given 80% while driving a BMW 116i (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 5,000 average miles
Fitted to our rear wheel driven BMW 116i - Quiet, Good wear and comfortable with very low noise. Drove up quite an incline in snow / slush covered road - they just gripped and got on with the job, no dramas! They grip very well in wet and admirably in dry. Not as good as summer tires in summer but they are all season.

Only slight downside is that they are not really progressive. They tend to just let go if pushed round bends.

Recommend these for any lower powered car.
May 29, 2015
Given 67% while driving a Honda Accord (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
I bought these after previously using Kleber Quadraxer and Goodyear 4 Vector Seasons on other cars.

They are fairly quiet. They grip well. However there is a major downside which is the sidewalls seem very stiff. These tires are sold as energy saving and have a low rolling resistance, I'm sure there are compromises in the design to achieve this. They filter out high frequency noise but don't seem to filter out low frequency noise very well, so the sound of rough tarmac and little surface irregularities can be felt and heard. Bumps come through and make the ride quite bad, I have had to deflate the tires below the recommended level to try and get the ride back to normal.
Not only that but even with the tires pumped up the MPG of my car did not improve at all! So I cannot recommend these really. I would go back to the Kleber Quadraxers which give a smooth ride, are better value even though they may grip a little less. The goodyear vectors were somewhere in the middle not soft and not hard and were more expensive.
March 23, 2014
Given 88% while driving a Kia Motors Rio 5 (185/65 R14 H) on mostly town for 500 average miles
extremely grippy and extremely quiet, it has transformed an otherwise mediocre car. very impressed so far will amend once I have winter tested.
August 2, 2013

How would you rate the Vredestein Quatrac Lite?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Vredestein Quatrac Lite Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Mazda 6 2.0 D (205/55 R16 V) on mostly country roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Have used separate winters and summers in the past (north-east UK) but not doing enough mileage to justify 2 sets any more.

Not driven in snow or less than 4C yet, but in colder weather are very decent in the dry and wet. In warmer weather (18C) grip absolutely fine but feel a little squidgy. The steering is just a little 'slow' rather than vague and is absolutely fine once turned in. Not understeery like I had feared.

Fuel economy is excellent, they deal with potholes and poor roads very well and feel nice for general driving. They're fine for brisk driving too, once you get used to the squidgy turn in when warm. They handled some spirited driving round the Scottish Highlands just fine, and I didn't wish I had summers.

Overall, far nicer than Michelin Energys in every way and are a compromise I'm happy to deal with provided they are at least usable should snow arrive. Beware, are very slippy when new!
November 1, 2013
Given 78% while driving a Mazda 6 (205/55 R15 V) on mostly country roads for 4,000 average miles
Can't comment on the wear rate as we have only had them on since November. They have been much quieter and given a more comfortable ride then the tires they replaced. The steering feel on turn in is a little less sharp but not significant. wet grip has been good, not had much experience of the dry but it has been at least average. In the snow this last few months they have been excellent, a significant improvement over summer tires, I've definitely driven in conditions that would have left me stuck had I been on regular summer tires.
February 25, 2013
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 93% while driving a Citroën C4 (205/50 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
I have had All Seasons in the past and they were good in the snow but poor during the summer, so I purchased the Lites not expecting much. The 205/50/17VR covered 6000 Miles mainly in the rain during 2012. Excellent in the wet, adding greater straight line stability when hitting standing water. On the few dry days the tires were fine and did not break traction even when provoked. There was no discernable difference in ride comfort from my previous Michelins. During colder weather tires gripped well on cold wet roads with excellent braking and lateral stability when cornering. During snow in January I had my doubts about how the tires would compared to my normal Winter Yokohama W Drives. Driving up the gentle slope of my icy driveway the Lites coped with no problems with four inches of snow. Out on the road they inspired confidence on Ice and snow. In an ice covered rural farm yard in which one struggled to stand, I left a Audi A4 with Quattro on summer tires with wheels spinning while I drove out as normal. So far I have had not had to use the snow setting on my Automatic transmission to set off or turn off the traction control. Finally, an excellent all rounder.
January 19, 2013
Given 96% while driving a Renault megane cc (205/55 R16 V) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
Review only after 1 month use. Former tires were Michelin Energy Saver.
These tires safe even better fuel. More noiseless as Michelin. Better steering direction. About wear it is to young for that. I am happy with these tires. No more tire changes twice a year with wintertires.
November 5, 2011
Rate the Vredestein Quatrac Lite