Honda Accord Tourer Type S Tires

On this page you will find the best real world tire reviews from owners of the Honda Accord Tourer Type S.

Do you Drive a Honda Accord Tourer Type S? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire! After all, who knows what the best tire for a Accord Tourer Type S better than the owners?

Review Your Tires >>

Tire Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 (407) 92% 89% 85% 85% 80% 87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 (303) 90% 88% 84% 84% 73% 82%
Cooper WeatherMaster Snow (7) 82% 85% 83% 78% 80% 82%
Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response (103) 88% 84% 84% 77% 76% 80%
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 (29) 86% 85% 73% 77% 86% 84%
Kumho Ecsta HS51 (37) 87% 83% 77% 80% 79% 85%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 (11) 83% 73% 73% 74% 87% 77%
Michelin Primacy HP (199) 85% 75% 77% 74% 77% 76%
Pirelli P Zero (161) 84% 68% 75% 72% 58% 64%
Yokohama dB super E spec (6) 72% 55% 70% 68% 66% 80%
Pirelli P6000 (175) 66% 46% 55% 48% 67% 60%

Honda Accord Tourer Type S Tire Review Highlights

Writing about the Kumho Ecsta HS51 given 86% (235-45-18-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 8000 spirited miles
I've had these on for a year now, and I am very pleasantly surprised at the outright grip both wet and dry these offer. The tires that preceded these were Falken FK510, Hankook VP3 K125 and most recently Nokian Powerproof. I found the Hankooks best for wear, Nokians were good for wet grip but did not last very long and the Falkens may as well have been made from chewing gum for the service life they gave. I know the Honda Accord Type S Tourer is a fairly heavy vehicle and has a decent bit of torque and power but I have a commute that is 80km per day so wear is a factor, the remap adds some more as well. With these HS51 I can say that I am very happy with their performance so far and would definately buy them again. Wet grip/braking and wear are my two main objectives regarding tires and on these points and more they deliver. They are not the most fuel efficient tires but they are very durable and that is worth more to me than some theoretical figure of fuel saving in the long run. In summary I would say that I highly recommend these tires if you have a larger heavier car and don't want the lightweight quiet, fuel efficient tires that have the sidewall strength of a piece of overcooked pasta, these are old school tires that are heavy and solid and last while giving great grip and wear.
tire reviewed on 2022-02-23 15:07:00
Writing about the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 given 80% (225-45-18-V)
Driving on a combination of roads for 6000 average miles
Absolutely happy with tires. Used as All Season Tires. Completed 5000miles/8000km
Tires been used average driving conditions, average weather all year. (From -12 to +31 Celsius, UK conditions)
Front tires left ~7mm, rear tires left ~8mm
Few times crossed paddle with no issue
Great tires for affordable price
tire reviewed on 2019-07-10 15:39:22
Writing about the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 given 89% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 9000 spirited miles
Bought these tires in favor of the Nokian WR d3 because they were cheaper like 20 euros a pice . In the snow i was impressed , grip in the wet and dry is decent for my 210 hp 2.2 D Type S Accord . Its a solid tire , comfort is very good . I have used nexen as summer tires on my other cars and thats why i decided to give them a try on there winter tires , very happy with my purches ! I recomand theme
tire reviewed on 2017-10-09 09:58:33
Writing about the Cooper WeatherMaster Snow given 56% (235-45-17-H)
Driving on a combination of roads for 10000 spirited miles
The tires feel good, grip well and so on. Drive good on snow as well.

I was shocked to find at the end of the season(single) that wheels started to vibrate. I drove to a garage to balance the wheels and there another surprise - all four tires had an uneven wear, every second knot on the outside edge of the Tire was shorter by at least 3mm. I have never seen this before in my life. Surely it is not due to the alignment of the wheels as tires before wear well (summer) and already did another 20k km on other tires that wear well.

I drive most of my distance on a wet and dry highway at 140km/h (around 85mph) in Switzerland, with temperatures mostly between 0-10 Celsius. I never drove in warm days, nor over aggressive style. Had plenty of occasions to try the tyrÄ—s in the mountain roads (lots of snow and ice, Inc driving with chains).
tire reviewed on 2017-09-21 03:34:39
Writing about the Dunlop SP Sport Fast Response given 87% (205-55-16-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 30000 average miles
Great touring tire. It quiet (and was quiet for all its lifetime), comfy and has very good grip on dry and also in wet. Also mileage is very good, over 30.000 miles.
I have got MFS 91W version, with the rim protector which is great and I miss it at the new bluresponse tire at 16" size.


On the other hand I drove 15" fastresponse on diesel focus (15" H) and the mileae was very poor (15000 miles I guess). Probably depends size to size.
tire reviewed on 2015-01-24 00:06:30
Writing about the Yokohama dB super E spec given 33% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 30000 average miles
I bought tires twice new set and always same - big noise and after 10000 miles tires were close to dead, luckly same bad behavior next 20k miles but honestly last 10k was really too danger to drive. Never more Yokohama. waiting money and rather pay a little bit more to get more reliable.
I bought Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC - 225/45 R17 91 W and totally different level of tires
tire reviewed on 2014-01-19 14:12:55
Writing about the Michelin Primacy HP given 76% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 34000 average miles
Nice tire for the price, very comfortable ride, handles well in the wet, good dry road handling as well,wears down to quickly.
tire reviewed on 2012-05-31 07:27:03
Writing about the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 given 90% (225-45-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 3000 average miles
I have had Godyear Assymetric F1 225/45 R17 XL load index 94 (version 1) before these. I was satisfied with Goodyear in the past, so decided to buy same brand again. I'll compare version 1 vs version 2. Only problem with version 1 was that they didn't last long, near 25.000 km. Everything else was extremely good. Grip wet and dry, handling, noise, comfort was good as well.
Now I've purchased version 2 non-XL, load index 91. In version 2 I like grip, wet and dry. I like extremely good comfort and very low noise level. What I don't like much in version 2 are soft sidewalls. I need to put more air pressure in, that is not a problem. But, handling isn't as good. I can feel that tires are very soft during hard cornering. So, need to brake a little and do not push that hard into the corner. This is annoying. With this experience I would consider XL version, load index 94, for the front axle. The car I drive is Honda Accord Tourer 2,4.
tire reviewed on 2012-05-14 09:33:42
Writing about the Yokohama dB super E spec given 57% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 23000 average miles
Recommended by Honda BUT do not last. Driver's tire went flat twice in three years!
tire reviewed on 2012-05-06 18:51:25
Writing about the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 given 97% (225-45-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 3000 spirited miles
I had a pair of these fitted on the front and they really are excellent in every way, the best tires I've had on any car. This is the fourth type of tire I've had on the Honda Accord Type S and it's the best. Very smooth and very precise in all conditions. Highly recommended.
tire reviewed on 2012-02-25 23:35:10
Writing about the Michelin Pilot Sport 3 PS3 given 79% (225-45-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 17000 spirited miles
The Pilot Sport 3 tires are excellent in every way but I had hoped they would last longer than 17,000 miles. The grooves around the circumference of the tire are wide so there is less rubber then on some tires. I guess that's what gives the grip. I often have the car loaded up with windsurfing equipment and it still has excellent handling and cornering. Unsurprisingly they were not so good in the snow and very difficult indeed to get going without spinning. However, once moving they weren't bad. Overall a very good, safe tire at speed on all kinds of roads.
tire reviewed on 2011-11-21 10:33:53
Writing about the Pirelli P6000 given 44% (225-45-17-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 3000 average miles
Can't believe these tires are made by the same company who make the fantastic P Zero Rosso s! The P6000 s are the worst tire I've ever used. Just bought a Honda Accord tourer with 4 new P6000s and ended up going sideways through a small bend - only saved the car with some extreme opposite lock. Quite a feat considering the car is front wheel drive! Absolutely no feedback that the tire was at it's absolute limit (at 40 mph)! They also wheel spin in 2nd gear and are VERY noisy. Can't wait to change when funds permit.
tire reviewed on 2011-02-19 11:35:14
Drive this car? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire