Menu

Yokohama dB super E spec

The Yokohama dB super E spec is a Premium Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.1
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
72%
Wet Grip
55%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
68%
Wear
66%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
55%
6 Reviews
67% Average
103,060 miles driven
Yokohama dB super E spec

Yokohama dB super E spec

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.1 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 66.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.17
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Yokohama dB super E spec

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama dB super E spec

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Yokohama dB super E spec. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Yokohama dB super E spec Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Suzuki (175/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 60 average miles
Original fit to 2011 suzuki swift. Just changed out at 98,000km of mixed country and urban driving. Great grip, very low noise and fantastic wear rate. Car is light an modestly powered and driven modestly. Superb experience. Have replaced with identical tire.
May 31, 2014
Given 33% while driving a Honda Accord Tourer Type S (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 30,000 average miles
I bought tires twice new set and always same - big noise and after 10000 miles tires were close to dead, luckly same bad behavior next 20k miles but honestly last 10k was really too danger to drive. Never more Yokohama. waiting money and rather pay a little bit more to get more reliable.
I bought Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC - 225/45 R17 91 W and totally different level of tires
January 19, 2014
Given 57% while driving a Honda Accord Tourer Type S (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 23,000 average miles
Recommended by Honda BUT do not last. Driver's tire went flat twice in three years!
May 6, 2012

How would you rate the Yokohama dB super E spec?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Yokohama dB super E spec Reviews

Given 70% while driving a Honda Civic FD1 1.8 i Vtec (205/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
I had these tires installed in my Honda Civic 8th Gen to replace the worn out stock fitted Bridge Stones.

The highlight of the Yoko's is the comfort. They are extremely silent and soft on the car's suspension. In the first few weeks after getting these installed i actually looked forward to driving my car at work and around town everyday as the car felt quite and smoother than before. The tires absorbed the bumps on the road beautifully.

The wet grip of Yoko's is normal, In my opinion the bridge stones when new offered a much better grip in wet conditions. The confidence level remains a little low when negotiating round abouts and narrow exits from the flyovers and motorways .I felt the car slipping away a little at speed of 50-60KM when negotiating narrow turns.

The dry grip however was satisfactory.

June 8, 2011
Given 57% while driving a Toyota Yaris (185/60 R15 H) on mostly town for 14,000 easy going miles
OEM fitment on a 2007 Yaris; Quiet running tires and good dry grip. Average in the wet, but hopeless in slushy, snowy winter weather. Nowhere near the confidence levels/capability given by the Bridgestone Touranzas on our other Toyota.
But worst of all is the very high wear rate for tires that are driven gently around urban area with very little motorway use. Down to wear bars on the fronts at only 13,500 miles.
August 14, 2010
Given 87% while driving a Toyota Wish (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Have been using the tire for my past 3 cars i've own.

Compared to major brands slient/comfort for this tires are thumbs UP

Taxi company in singapore should invest on this for their customer comfort. An incident when i was in singapore that their mercedes cabs are using low budget tires, causing the tire hollow sound when travelling at 80km/h and above which i think it should be changed for customer comfort.

Such a comfortable car on budget tires like *Taxi Radial, Hankook OPTIMO K715, Pirelli P3000 and Goodyear EfficientGrip.

Great tire for daily driving currently on 50,000km yet the threading are still good for another 10,000km.
February 23, 2010
Rate the Yokohama dB super E spec