Hyundai Tucson Tires
On this page you will find the best real world tire reviews from owners of the Hyundai Tucson.
Do you Drive a Hyundai Tucson? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire! After all, who knows what the best tire for a Tucson better than the owners?
| Tire Reviewed | Dry Grip | Wet Grip | Feedback | Handling | Wear | Comfort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen 1 (3) | 90% | 95% | 90% | 85% | 95% | 95% |
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 (15) | 91% | 88% | 86% | 76% | 92% | 91% |
| Dynamo STREET H MU02 (16) | 93% | 83% | 85% | 84% | 85% | 85% |
| Michelin Alpin 6 (30) | 89% | 92% | 85% | 83% | 85% | 90% |
| Barum Bravuris 4x4 (3) | 90% | 87% | 77% | 80% | 83% | 93% |
| Continental WinterContact TS 790 (5) | 82% | 92% | 78% | 88% | 90% | 86% |
| Kumho Crugen HP91 (18) | 93% | 89% | 84% | 84% | 73% | 84% |
| Nokian Nordman 7 (6) | 76% | 78% | 63% | 76% | 90% | 82% |
| Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 (35) | 91% | 78% | 78% | 88% | 75% | 81% |
| Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 (115) | 90% | 81% | 80% | 79% | 80% | 81% |
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 (122) | 87% | 83% | 75% | 74% | 83% | 84% |
| Continental Premium Contact 6 (118) | 89% | 84% | 83% | 85% | 74% | 78% |
| Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo (9) | 90% | 87% | 71% | 78% | 80% | 82% |
| Nexen N Blue HD Plus (70) | 83% | 79% | 77% | 75% | 76% | 84% |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO (2) | 100% | 70% | 70% | 80% | 0% | 80% |
| Petlas Explero W671 (4) | 80% | 73% | 78% | 80% | 80% | 75% |
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 (69) | 86% | 82% | 80% | 80% | 74% | 74% |
| Yokohama BluEarth RV02 (8) | 83% | 81% | 78% | 80% | 59% | 86% |
| Nokian WeatherProof (31) | 80% | 84% | 79% | 79% | 74% | 87% |
| Uniroyal Rallye4x4 Street (4) | 80% | 95% | 73% | 55% | 65% | 88% |
| Michelin Primacy HP (199) | 85% | 75% | 77% | 74% | 77% | 76% |
| Hankook Optimo K406 (9) | 90% | 83% | 87% | 61% | 66% | 66% |
| Landsail LS588 UHP (94) | 80% | 73% | 69% | 66% | 75% | 79% |
| Toyo Open Country All Terrain (16) | 81% | 76% | 73% | 74% | 81% | 79% |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 (87) | 78% | 86% | 76% | 73% | 61% | 75% |
| General Altimax RT43 (10) | 82% | 79% | 72% | 72% | 79% | 73% |
| Davanti DX740 (3) | 77% | 73% | 73% | 70% | 50% | 80% |
| Hankook Ventus Prime2 (61) | 79% | 73% | 72% | 71% | 67% | 72% |
| Continental ContiSportContact 5 SUV (34) | 84% | 80% | 76% | 80% | 53% | 70% |
| Nexen WinGuard SUV (4) | 80% | 70% | 65% | 55% | 75% | 63% |
| Toyo Proxes C1S (37) | 78% | 68% | 70% | 69% | 66% | 70% |
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 (75) | 82% | 85% | 76% | 73% | 55% | 71% |
| Nexen Roadian GTX (4) | 88% | 80% | 58% | 80% | 63% | 83% |
| Pirelli Scorpion Verde (58) | 78% | 69% | 68% | 68% | 59% | 72% |
| Evergreen EH23 (9) | 82% | 56% | 66% | 68% | 76% | 68% |
| Wanli S1063 (80) | 74% | 58% | 63% | 61% | 77% | 65% |
| Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV (4) | 83% | 73% | 68% | 68% | 48% | 68% |
| Kumho KL33 (9) | 73% | 65% | 63% | 65% | 59% | 73% |
| Laufenn S Fit AS (11) | 84% | 72% | 82% | 84% | 70% | 85% |
| Apollo Acelere (5) | 70% | 53% | 63% | 55% | 68% | 65% |
| Hankook Optimo H426 (9) | 81% | 76% | 66% | 63% | 60% | 58% |
| Continental EcoContact 6 (112) | 74% | 57% | 59% | 61% | 54% | 69% |
| Nexen N Priz RH7 (6) | 76% | 74% | 60% | 72% | 74% | 72% |
| Firestone Champion Fuel Fighter (1) | 60% | 70% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 60% |
| Constancy LY688 (25) | 57% | 43% | 47% | 42% | 68% | 50% |
| Hifly HF201 (34) | 57% | 43% | 49% | 43% | 45% | 56% |
| Rotalla F105 (29) | 64% | 31% | 45% | 41% | 58% | 58% |
| Wanli S1088 (85) | 57% | 35% | 41% | 39% | 59% | 38% |
Hyundai Tucson Tire Review Highlights
Writing about the Michelin CrossClimate 2 given 93% (235-55-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 500 spirited miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 500 spirited miles
On dy roads - very good grip and very predictive behaviour. Strong braking, similar feeling to many summer touring tires I prevously used (such as Michelin Primacy 4, Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, Vredestein Ultrac).
On wet roads - no complaints so far, oversteering when pushed enough, but actually feel very safe. In my opinion, braking is quite strong (according tests, there are better products for that matter, but I don't have any experience with other AS tires).
Wear rate - n/a, too early to tell anything.
Snow - n/a, hoping to have an opportunity soon now, in Dec or Jan.
Comfort level is excellent, especially by considering all other dynamic properties. Almost as a touring premium winter tire.
So far I've driven them between 30°C in Sept
and around 3°C of dry roads during recent few weeks.
What I am worried about is how they will handle high summer temperatures and UV levels (in Jun-Jul-Aug it can be up to 37°C in my area, while asphalt is probably over 60°C). Guys from few tire shops were persuading me that this is the only product that can handle 3 such summers after which ageing degradation becomes noticeable, impacting colder seasons properties.
Honestly, main reason I chose CC2 over Bridgestone Turanza AS6 or Pirelli AS SF3 is because of real-life longevity (ageing, not mileage), which yet has to be proven by these CC2's newest competitors.
Before I bought CC2, car was new with Continental Ecodrive 6. Only good thing I can state is almost non-existing noise level and approx. 5% lower fuel consumption. Grip wasn't good enough for my taste, and aquaplaning was actually scary. I don't think they are good for any comparison.
On wet roads - no complaints so far, oversteering when pushed enough, but actually feel very safe. In my opinion, braking is quite strong (according tests, there are better products for that matter, but I don't have any experience with other AS tires).
Wear rate - n/a, too early to tell anything.
Snow - n/a, hoping to have an opportunity soon now, in Dec or Jan.
Comfort level is excellent, especially by considering all other dynamic properties. Almost as a touring premium winter tire.
So far I've driven them between 30°C in Sept
and around 3°C of dry roads during recent few weeks.
What I am worried about is how they will handle high summer temperatures and UV levels (in Jun-Jul-Aug it can be up to 37°C in my area, while asphalt is probably over 60°C). Guys from few tire shops were persuading me that this is the only product that can handle 3 such summers after which ageing degradation becomes noticeable, impacting colder seasons properties.
Honestly, main reason I chose CC2 over Bridgestone Turanza AS6 or Pirelli AS SF3 is because of real-life longevity (ageing, not mileage), which yet has to be proven by these CC2's newest competitors.
Before I bought CC2, car was new with Continental Ecodrive 6. Only good thing I can state is almost non-existing noise level and approx. 5% lower fuel consumption. Grip wasn't good enough for my taste, and aquaplaning was actually scary. I don't think they are good for any comparison.
Writing about the Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 given 83% (215-65-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 34000 average miles
Driving on mostly country roads for 34000 average miles
I’ve used them for two summers in Sweden, driven about 55000km and they still have some useful tread left. None of the tires are below 4.5mm. They are more of an comfortable tire than a sporty but they grip well and have never let me down this far
Writing about the Davanti DX740 given 67% (225-60-17-)
Driving on mostly town for 2000 average miles
Driving on mostly town for 2000 average miles
Easy side wall damage with road imperfections/potholes. Wouldn’t recommend if travelling on roads that aren’t prestine
Writing about the Continental EcoContact 6 given 81% (215-65-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 30000 average miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 30000 average miles
Replacing these tires after 48.000 km and still 3.5 mm tread by Michelins. Had two punctures and found contiseal technology quite useful.
Writing about the Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 given 83% (215-65-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 218000 average miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 218000 average miles
I find these tires to be very comfortable, which is why I got them. I drive 200km to work, five days a week and I can’t find anything wrong with them so far. I’ve driven approximately 35000km since I bought this set and it has hardly worn at all and they have never disappointed
Writing about the Nexen N Priz RH7 given 0% (225-55-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 miles
They gave me full 5 years,, more than 75000 km,, I bought them again.
Noisey
Writing about the Continental EcoContact 6 given 79% (215-65-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 30000 average miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 30000 average miles
Update of my previous reviews , after 40.000 km , tread still at 3,5 mm
Writing about the Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 given 88% (215-65-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 3500 average miles
Driving on mostly country roads for 3500 average miles
Have driven about 5000km on them so far and I like the way it handles and the level of comfort. It’s rather soft tire, maybe having a wide sidewall reinforce that feeling, but it gives a feeling of control that suits me well
Writing about the Nexen Roadian GTX given 70% (235-55-19-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 300 average miles
Driving on mostly motorways for 300 average miles
New car with out of round tires fitted. Would seem quality control or other has caused this problem.
Writing about the Kumho Ecsta PS71 given 72% (245-45-19-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 8000 average miles
Driving on a combination of roads for 8000 average miles
They aren't the greatest tires I've ever had on a car - but I have these on my Tucson that is used predominantly for road trips in mixed weather and they handle amazingly well in the rain.. - In scenarios where I am convinced I would aquaplane in my other car - these things cut through the water and keep their grip. Took the car around Europe and around the Scottish coasts and just exuded confidence in extreme rain conditions. Not a snow tire.. - but I carry road chains for Alpine driving in snow and these tires take the chains well.. - So not terribly worried about this. In terms of dry use: Nothing special, but decent for the price.. - Have only done 8000 miles and wear seems OK...
Writing about the Laufenn S Fit AS given 77% (225-55-18-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 200 average miles
Driving on mostly motorways for 200 average miles
No comments left
Best Tire Tests
Best UUHP Tires- Best Performance Summer Tires
- Best Summer Tires
Best All Season Tires- Best UHP All Season Tires
Best Winter Tires- Best UHP Winter Tires
- Best SUV Winter Tires
- Best Studless Winter Tires
- Best All Terrain [AT] Tires
- Best SUV Summer Tires
Winter Tire Tests
- The BEST Performance Winter Tires for 2024 / 2025
- 2023/24 Tire Reviews UHP Winter Tire Test
- 2023 Tire Reviews SUV Winter Tire Test
- 2023 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test
- 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tire Test
- 2024 Studded Tire Test
- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test
- 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tire Test
- All Winter Tire Tests
All Season Tire Tests
- The BEST All Terrain Tire for 2025
- The Best All Season Tires for 2024 / 2025
- The Best All Season Tires for 2024
- Goodyear Eagle F1 vs Falken Azenis FK460 vs Wildpeak AT Trail
- Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One
- 2023/24 Best All Terrain Tires In Snow
- 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test
- Best All Terrain Tires Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024]
- All All Season Tire Tests
Summer Tire Tests
- 2023 Tire Reviews Performance Tire Test
- Are Budget Tires Finally Good Enough? 8 Cheap Tires VS 1 Premium Tire
- 2023 Tire Reviews Best Summer Tires
- 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tires for Asia Test
- 2024 EVO Summer Tire Test
- 2024 Auto Express Summer Tire Test
- All Summer Tire Tests
Features
- Understanding The Tire Sidewall
- EU Tire Label
- Summer VS All Season VS Winter
- Road vs Track vs Slick Tires
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4S vs 4S * (BMW)
- OE vs Aftermarket Tires
- Winter Tires Tested at 0c to15c
Tire Reviews
General
