2015 Sport Auto 19 Inch Winter Tire Test

Test Summary
Wet BrakingContinental WinterContact TS 850 P
Dry BrakingContinental WinterContact TS 850 P
Wet HandlingPirelli Winter Sottozero 3
WearContinental WinterContact TS 850 P
Rolling ResistanceContinental WinterContact TS 850 P
Snow HandlingVredestein Wintrac xtreme S
Nokian WR D4
Nankang Activa SV 55
This year, Sport Auto have tested seven different UHP winter tires in 235/35 R19, on a VW Golf R.

Snow

Testing in Northern Finland for snow performance, the Pirelli won the snow tests with a precise steering response, quick lap time and solid traction and braking results. Other tires stopped slightly quicker, but they lacked the Pirellis speed and balance during the other tests. Continental was the second best in test, winning braking and placing well in all the other tests, and the Michelin had an equally strong showing to third. The budget tires from Star Performer and Nankang found themselves outclassed by the premium brands in the snow, finishing at, or near the bottom in all four tests.

19

Wet

For wet and dry testing, Sport Auto moved to Germany. Wet braking was dominated by Michelin, but with the budget Star Performer a surprise second place narrowly beating Continental, which rounded out the top three.

Wet cornering was similarly surprising, with Continental moving up to the top spot, star performer staying second and Vredestein taking third place. While the raw numbers showed the Star Performer to be up there with the Continental, the subjective balance was far more difficult to manage than the premium winner, with the car switching to sudden oversteer with the budget tire, where the Continental offered safe, gradual understeer.

Dry

The dry performance was again dominated by Continental, winning three of the four tests. Star Performer have proven you can make a winter tire work in two of the three categories, but it's very rare to find one tire at the front of all the dry, wet and snow testing. Somehow, Continental have managed this with the TS850P.

Endurance testing

One test we've not seen before was a high speed rig test. VW tire standards require tires endure 10 minutes of running at 174 mph, so Sport Auto setup a rig with -3 negative camber (higher than the specification) and started running the tires at 168 mph for 10 minutes. All tires managed this, but when increased to the required 174 mph the Nankang and Star Performer tires failed almost immediately. The Continental, Michelin, Nokian and Pirelli were fine up until 199 mph, and the Vredestein survived for 10 minutes at 205 mph!

Results

1st: Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
  • 235/35 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 53.7
  2. Dry: 9.7
  3. Wet: 9.2
  4. Snow: 8.6
  5. Rolling Resistance: 10
  6. Noise: 7
  7. Overall: 9.2
Short braking distances on snow and dry roads, good handling and a high level of safety in the wet, precise steering response, low rolling resistance
Relatively low lateral stability on snow
Particularly recommended

Read Reviews

2nd: Michelin Pilot Alpin 4

Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
  • 235/35 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 50.6
  2. Dry: 8.6
  3. Wet: 9
  4. Snow: 9
  5. Rolling Resistance: 8
  6. Noise: 7
  7. Overall: 9
Short braking distances and very good handling on snow, short braking distances on wet surfaces, good handling on dry surfaces
Relatively long braking distance on dry roads, weak resistance to aquaplaning
Particularly recommended

Read Reviews

3rd: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
  • 235/35 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 49.9
  2. Dry: 8.7
  3. Wet: 8.3
  4. Snow: 9.3
  5. Rolling Resistance: 8
  6. Noise: 7
  7. Overall: 8.6
Excellent lateral stability and excellent handling on snow, good handling on dry roads
Weak resistance to aquaplaning
Recommended

Read Reviews    Buy from £240.99

4th: Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S

Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
  • 235/35 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 50.5
  2. Dry: 9
  3. Wet: 7.8
  4. Snow: 8.4
  5. Rolling Resistance: 7
  6. Noise: 10
  7. Overall: 8.3
Short braking distance and good traction on snow, acceptable handling and precise steering response on dry and wet surfaces, very low noise level
Average lateral stability and long braking distances on wet surfaces, poor resistance to aquaplaning
Recommended

Read Reviews

5th: Nokian WR D4

Nokian WR D4
  • 235/35 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 50.2
  2. Dry: 7.4
  3. Wet: 7.9
  4. Snow: 8.8
  5. Rolling Resistance: 8
  6. Noise: 10
  7. Overall: 8.1
Good balance of features, short braking distances on snow , good resistance to aquaplaning, low noise level
Long braking distances on dry and wet surfaces, tendency to oversteer during an emergency maneuver in the dry, average handling on dry roads
Recommended

Read Reviews

6th: Star Performer SPTS AS

Star-Performer SPTS AS
  • 235/35 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 45.6
  2. Dry: 9.1
  3. Wet: 8.7
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Rolling Resistance: 6
  6. Noise: 8
  7. Overall: 7.8
Short braking distances on dry and wet roads, good steering feel and control on wet tarmac
Very low grip and a strong tendency to understeer in the snow, high rolling resistance, high noise level
Conditionally recommended

Read Reviews

7th: Nankang Activa SV 55

Nankang Activa SV 55
  • 235/35 R19
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 44.5
  2. Dry: 8
  3. Wet: 6.5
  4. Snow: 6.9
  5. Rolling Resistance: 6
  6. Noise: 10
  7. Overall: 7.1
Acceptable level of safety in the dry
Low lateral stability and overall weak grip on snow, long braking distances on dry and wet surfaces, poor resistance to aquaplaning, high noise level, high rolling resistance
Not recommended

Read Reviews

 

comments powered by Disqus