Test Summary
Wet Braking	Michelin CrossClimate
Dry Braking	Continental WinterContact TS 860
Wet Handling	Continental WinterContact TS 860
Rolling Resistance	Continental WinterContact TS 860
Noise	Continental WinterContact TS 860 Nokian WR D4 Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Snow Handling	Hankook Winter i cept RS2 GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP

Once again in 2016, the German Magazine Auto Zeitung have provided one of the most exciting winter tire tests we've covered. Testing thirteen of the latest winter tires in 205/55 R16, including the Continental WinterContact TS860, Dunlop Winter Sport 5, Goodyear UltraGrip 9 and Nokian WR D4, Auto Zeitung have also included the Michelin CrossClimate summer-bias all season tire as a comparison.

The new tires dominate

The Continental WinterContact TS850 was largely unbeaten in its four year life, so it is no surprise the new TS860 once again dominates the test, winning on snow, in the wet, lowest fuel use, best comfort, and scoring extremely well in the dry.

The new Nokian WR D4 also continues where the WR D3 left off, scoring extremely well on snow and in the dry. Compared to the best winter tires on test, the WR D4 lacks a little in the wet, but it's still one of the best winter tires on test.

The top three is rounded out by the Pirelli Cinturato Winter. It scores well in the snow and wet tests, but gives up some points due to long braking distances in the dry and a higher rolling resistance than the best tested.

It's no surprise fourth, fifth and sixth places are taken by Goodyear, Michelin and Dunlop. All three tires offer a strong balanced performance, and with the top six places so closely contested this year, any of these tires would be excellent choices for winter motoring.

The Michelin CrossClimate

The inclusion of the CrossClimate in a full winter tire test is extremely interesting, as the main reservation most people have for the CrossClimate is the snow and ice performance.

Unsurprisingly the Michelin dominates under dry braking, stopping the car from 62 mph in 40.2 meters whereas the winning Continental could only manage 44.4 meters. The dry handing lap was closer, but the CrossClimate still wins, completing the 3.3 km lap in 107.9 seconds, compared to 109.3 seconds for the Continental.

In the wet, the Michelin stopped the car from 62 mph in 57.6 meters, with the Continental much closer at 57.9 meters. The Continental wins the wet handling course, completing the 1.7 km lap in 87.5 seconds compared to 89 seconds for the Michelin, which places it fourth overall.

The snow performance is where the Michelin CrossClimate is often questioned. Under snow braking from 31 mph, the Continental stopped the car in 24.2 meters and the Michelin 25.1 meters, less than a meter shorter than the test winner, and beating one of the winter tires on test. During snow handling the Continental finishes the 1.3 km lap in 74 seconds, and the Michelin 77.1 seconds. While this is a gap to the Continental, the Michelin CrossClimate was faster than three of the full winter tires, including the winter experts Vredestein.

If you're living in a climate like England where snow is a rare occurrence, this test indicates you're better off running the Michelin CrossClimate as your winter option due to the dry and wet braking advantages the tire offers.

The Results

1st: Continental WinterContact TS 860
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 412 Dry: 84 Wet: 142 Snow: 143 Comfort: 9 Rolling Resistance: 25 Noise: 9 Very good results in the snow, short braking distances and good handling on wet surfaces, short braking distances in the dry, low rolling resistance Relatively weak dry braking Read Reviews
2nd: Nokian WR D4
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 387 Dry: 83 Wet: 124 Snow: 142 Comfort: 9 Rolling Resistance: 21 Noise: 8 Good handling on snow, short braking distances on wet surfaces, the shortest braking distance on dry roads (other than CrossClimate), predictable behavior on dry roads, low rolling resistance Average wet handling Read Reviews
3rd: Pirelli Cinturato Winter
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 378 Dry: 70 Wet: 138 Snow: 139 Comfort: 7 Rolling Resistance: 15 Noise: 9 Good steering feel and precise reaction to steering and neutral behavior in the snow, good handling on wet surfaces Long braking distances and a tendency to understeer on dry roads, high rolling resistance Read Reviews
4th: Michelin CrossClimate
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 376 Dry: 105 Wet: 122 Snow: 113 Comfort: 6 Rolling Resistance: 21 Noise: 9 Acceptable results in the snow, short braking distances and good handling on dry roads Poor resistance to lateral aquaplaning (2mm less starting tread depth than full winter tires) Read Reviews
4th: Goodyear UltraGrip 9
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 376 Dry: 78 Wet: 127 Snow: 132 Comfort: 8 Rolling Resistance: 22 Noise: 9 High traction on snow, good braking and lateral stability on wet surfaces Snow understeer, slow steering in the dry Read Reviews    Buy from £89.45
4th: Michelin Alpin 5
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 376 Dry: 74 Wet: 128 Snow: 140 Comfort: 8 Rolling Resistance: 18 Noise: 8 Good traction in the snow, good overall grip in the wet Slow steering on snow, slow steering and poor handling in the dry Read Reviews
7th: Dunlop Winter Sport 5
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 367 Dry: 80 Wet: 112 Snow: 136 Comfort: 9 Rolling Resistance: 22 Noise: 8 Short braking on snow and in the dry, high resistance to aquaplaning, low rolling resistance Understeer in the snow, average wet braking, slow steering in the dry Read Reviews    Buy from £89.40
8th: Hankook Winter i cept RS2
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 363 Dry: 85 Wet: 104 Snow: 141 Comfort: 7 Rolling Resistance: 16 Noise: 10 High traction, short braking distances and predictable behavior on snow (although the steering feel could be better), excellent resistance to aquaplaning, quiet Poor wet handling, long wet braking Read Reviews
9th: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 341 Dry: 80 Wet: 100 Snow: 127 Comfort: 7 Rolling Resistance: 19 Noise: 8 High resistance to longitudinal aquaplaning, high lateral grip and good handling on dry surface Slow response to steering on snow, average braking performance and a tendency to understeer in the wet, the longest braking distance on dry roads Read Reviews
10th: Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 341 Dry: 84 Wet: 86 Snow: 136 Comfort: 7 Rolling Resistance: 20 Noise: 8 Read Reviews
11th: Kumho WinterCraft WP71
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 309 Dry: 76 Wet: 76 Snow: 125 Comfort: 7 Rolling Resistance: 16 Noise: 9 Short braking distances on snow and in the dry, relatively low rolling resistance Tendency to understeer in the snow and dry surfaces, weak lateral stability, long braking distances and generally poor grip in the wet Read Reviews
12th: Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 307 Dry: 84 Wet: 73 Snow: 114 Comfort: 9 Rolling Resistance: 18 Noise: 9 High traction and good handling on dry surfaces Poor snow grip, poor aquaplaning scores, long braking in the wet Read Reviews
13th: GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 305 Dry: 78 Wet: 95 Snow: 102 Comfort: 6 Rolling Resistance: 14 Noise: 10 Ok dry handling, quiet Poor aquaplaning resistance, high rolling resistance, poor wet grip Read Reviews
14th: Westlake SW618
205/55 R16 3PMSF: no	Total: 249 Dry: 74 Wet: 52 Snow: 98 Comfort: 7 Rolling Resistance: 10 Noise: 8 None mentioned Low adhesion, poor steering feel and unpredictable behavior on snow, poor resistance to aquaplaning, the longest braking distances in the wet, poor handling on a dry surface, very high rolling resistance Read Reviews