2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

Test Summary
Wet BrakingContinental WinterContact TS 860
Dry BrakingPirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
Wet HandlingBFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
Rolling ResistanceUniroyal MS Plus 77
NoiseMichelin Alpin 5
Semperit Speed Grip 3
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
Snow BrakingFulda Kristall Control HP2
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
Snow HandlingBridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
Ice BrakingNexen WinGuard Sport 2
Sava Eskimo HP2
The 2017 Auto Bild winter tire test started with fifty 225/50 R17 winter tire patterns which Auto Bild tested for wet braking performance, and then dropped the worse twenty tires from the test.

The next phase was testing the remaining thirty patterns for snow braking, which was then combined with the wet braking distances to allow the ten worst tires to be dropped. This left twenty winter tires which Auto Bild regarded as the best winter tires on the market, and deemed worthy enough to take through to the full testing.

As ever with Auto Bild testing, they undertake all the usual dry, wet and snow testing, but also including important factors such as wear and cost per 1,000 km, which a lot of tests are unable to include.

The results as closer than ever, and you'd be hard pressed to classify any of the top 10 tires as bad tires, but three in particular rose to the top.

Dry

In the dry grip testing, no tire got close the reference summer tire. During the braking tests, the Pirelli was the closest, but with all twenty winter tires separated by just 3 meters overall when braking from 100 km/h, the differences between the top ten were small.

The Continental winter tire was a step above the rest during dry handling, however it was still a large margin behind the summer reference tire in another closely contested category.

Winter tires often have a bad reputation for being noisy, but every winter tire managed to best the summer reference on test, with the Bridgestone winter tire quietest by some margin.

All tests are the combined results of drive by noise readings at both 50 km/h and 80 km/h.

Wet

The shallow water wet testing results were a little more spread out, but the summer tire still dominated. Again, the Pirelli was closest in wet braking, but this time there was over 4 meters separating the winter tires when braking from 80 km/h.

This time the Pirelli matched its wet braking peformance and finished the best winter tire during wet handling too.

The summer tire could only manage fourth place overall in the deep water aquaplaning tests, with the Michelin owned BF Goodrich and Kleber taking the top two places.

Snow

BF Goodrich and Kleber continued their success during the aquaplaning tests to stop the quickest when braking from 50 km/h on snow.

Barum took a surprise win during snow handling, with BF Goodrich a close second place. The reference summer tire couldn't even manage a lap of the snow handling course.

Cost

Difference between value and wear is an important distinction. Wear simply shows the projected mileage of the tire, based on Auto Bild's testing. Value looks at the projected mileage divided by the price Auto Bild paid for the set, giving you a "euro per 1,000 km" figure. While Michelin offered the best value of the premium tires on test, Nexen scored best in value thanks to excellent wear and a low purchase price.

While none of the winter tires could beat the summer tire during the rolling resistance testing, a number of tires were close. Ironically, the best value tire on test had the worst rolling resistance, which will offset some of the savings made over the tires tread life.

Results

The full results are below, and have Auto Bild's usual confusing weighting attached to each of the criteria. For more information, be sure to check out the Auto Bild website (German).

1st: Continental WinterContact TS 860

Continental WinterContact TS 860
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 48
  2. Dry: 7
  3. Wet: 7
  4. Snow: 7
  5. Comfort: 6
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 6
  8. Wear: 5
  9. Cost: 4
Test winner. Excellent performance in all weather conditions, direct steering response and strong handling in the snow and on dry roads.
Average mileage.
Exemplary.

Read Reviews

2nd: Michelin Alpin 5

Michelin Alpin 5
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 51
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 7
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 7
  6. Rolling Resistance: 4
  7. Noise: 7
  8. Wear: 8
  9. Cost: 6
Winter specialist with very good wet grip and low wear. Balance handling in the snow and dry, good aquaplaning resistance.
Slightly high rolling resistance.
Exemplary.

Read Reviews

3rd: Dunlop Winter Sport 5

Dunlop Winter Sport 5
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 47
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 7
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 6
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 6
  8. Wear: 5
  9. Cost: 5
Premium winter tire with balanced performance, good handling in the snow and wet, short wet braking distances.
Average mileage.
Exemplary.

Read Reviews    Buy from £127.42

4th: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 46
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 7
  4. Snow: 7
  5. Comfort: 6
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 7
  8. Wear: 4
  9. Cost: 3
Premium tires with excellent performance in all weather conditions. Precise steering and good feedback, short braking distances.
High price, high wear.
Good.

Read Reviews

5th: Semperit Speed Grip 3

Semperit Speed Grip 3
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 48
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 6
  4. Snow: 7
  5. Comfort: 7
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 7
  8. Wear: 4
  9. Cost: 5
Convincing all rounder with good winter characteristics and good handling in the dry. Good comfort.
Average mileage.
Good.

Read Reviews

6th: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 53
  2. Dry: 5
  3. Wet: 6
  4. Snow: 9
  5. Comfort: 7
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 8
  8. Wear: 6
  9. Cost: 6
The winter kings, winning the snow tests, excellent aquaplaning results, good ride comfort.
Slow steering, understeer in the dry.
Good.

Read Reviews

7th: Fulda Kristall Control HP2

Fulda Kristall Control HP2
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 53
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 6
  4. Snow: 7
  5. Comfort: 6
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 5
  8. Wear: 9
  9. Cost: 8
Low price, very good in the winter, excellent aquaplaning result, good ride comfort.
Slow steering, understeer in the wet.
Good.

Read Reviews

8th: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 51
  2. Dry: 5
  3. Wet: 8
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 4
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 9
  8. Wear: 7
  9. Cost: 6
A well balanced tire with excellent handling in the wet, low noise.
Average snow handling, long dry braking.
Good.

Read Reviews

9th: Kleber Krisalp HP3

Kleber Krisalp HP3
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 51
  2. Dry: 5
  3. Wet: 6
  4. Snow: 8
  5. Comfort: 6
  6. Rolling Resistance: 5
  7. Noise: 8
  8. Wear: 6
  9. Cost: 7
Excellent in the snow, good price / performance ratio, good aquaplaning resistance, low noise.
Poor dry grip and handling.
Good.

Read Reviews

10th: Nexen WinGuard Sport 2

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 51
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 5
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 5
  6. Rolling Resistance: 3
  7. Noise: 8
  8. Wear: 9
  9. Cost: 9
A good value winter tire with balanced handling in the snow and on dry roads. Short wet braking distances.
Limited aquaplaning resistance, high rolling resistance.
Good.

Read Reviews

11th: Gislaved EuroFrost 5

Gislaved EuroFrost 5
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 47
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 5
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 5
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 5
  8. Wear: 6
  9. Cost: 8
Stable handling on snow and dry roads, good aquaplaning resistance.
Limited grip in the wet with understeer.
Average.

Read Reviews

12th: Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Kumho WinterCraft WP71
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 48
  2. Dry: 5
  3. Wet: 5
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 4
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 7
  8. Wear: 7
  9. Cost: 8
Good snow traction, short wet and dry braking distances, good value.
Average handling with delayed turn-in, low comfort.
Average.

Read Reviews

13th: Uniroyal MS+ 77

Uniroyal MS Plus 77
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 49
  2. Dry: 5
  3. Wet: 5
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 6
  6. Rolling Resistance: 8
  7. Noise: 6
  8. Wear: 6
  9. Cost: 7
Good traction and braking in the snow, good aquaplaning resistance.
Slow steering response and poor cornering in the wet and dry.
Average.

Read Reviews

14th: Nokian WR D4

Nokian WR D4
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 42
  2. Dry: 5
  3. Wet: 6
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 5
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 7
  8. Wear: 3
  9. Cost: 4
Good performance in the wet and snow.
Understeer in the dry, high wear.
Average.

Read Reviews

15th: Yokohama W drive V905

Yokohama W drive V905
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 40
  2. Dry: 5
  3. Wet: 5
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 4
  6. Rolling Resistance: 4
  7. Noise: 6
  8. Wear: 4
  9. Cost: 6
Good traction and short braking in the snow, stable wet handling.
Poor snow handling, low aquaplaning resistance, poor comfort, high rolling resistance.
Average.

Read Reviews

16th: Barum Polaris 3

Barum Polaris 3
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 50
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 4
  4. Snow: 8
  5. Comfort: 5
  6. Rolling Resistance: 7
  7. Noise: 6
  8. Wear: 6
  9. Cost: 8
Low price, stable snow performance.
Poor wet braking and handling, average aquaplaning reserves.
Average.

Read Reviews

17th: Sava Eskimo HP2

Sava Eskimo HP2
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 47
  2. Dry: 5
  3. Wet: 4
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 3
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 6
  8. Wear: 8
  9. Cost: 9
Best price / wear ratio, good in the snow.
Poor wet handling, long wet and dry braking distances. Low comfort.
Average.

Read Reviews

18th: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 39
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 8
  4. Snow: 4
  5. Comfort: 4
  6. Rolling Resistance: 5
  7. Noise: 6
  8. Wear: 3
  9. Cost: 3
Short wet and dry braking distances, dynamic wet handling.
Average winter performance, low snow traction, long snow braking, high wear.
Average.

Read Reviews    Buy from £156.38

19th: Firestone Winterhawk 3

Firestone Winterhawk 3
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 43
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 4
  4. Snow: 6
  5. Comfort: 5
  6. Rolling Resistance: 4
  7. Noise: 7
  8. Wear: 5
  9. Cost: 6
Good snow traction, low noise.
Poor snow and wet handling, long wet braking, high rolling resistance.
Average.

Read Reviews

20th: Hankook Winter i cept evo2

Hankook Winter i cept evo2
  • 225/50 R17
  • 3PMSF: no
  1. Total: 41
  2. Dry: 6
  3. Wet: 5
  4. Snow: 4
  5. Comfort: 3
  6. Rolling Resistance: 6
  7. Noise: 6
  8. Wear: 5
  9. Cost: 6
Good dry handling, low rolling resistance.
Poor handling in the snow and wet. Average comfort.
Average.

Read Reviews

comments powered by Disqus