Dry Braking

Looking at data from eleven tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during eleven dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 10.08% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 0.3% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 1.02% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking

Looking at data from eleven tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during nine wet braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact stopped the vehicle in 2.08% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>

Wet Braking - Cool

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact stopped the vehicle in 1.2% less distance than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 0.45% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during five wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 2.17% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact had 5.32% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact floated at a 1.85% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during five curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact slipped out at a 0.64% higher speed than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>

Snow Braking

Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.02% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 accelerated 11.97% faster than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Traction

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during zero snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact had 4.73% better snow traction than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 2.64% faster around a lap than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 1.26% faster around a lap than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during zero subj. snow handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact scored 9.05% more points than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during zero snow circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact provided 4.46% more lateral grip than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during zero snow slalom tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact was 4.37% faster through a slalom than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>

Subj. Comfort

Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during seven noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 1.83% quieter than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one noise tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 measured 0.14% quieter than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Noise: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Noise winner was calculated >>

Tire Weight

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one tire weight tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact weighed 5.34% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Tire Weight: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one wear tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact is predicted to cover 0.35% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Wear: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Wear winner was calculated >>

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during two value tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact proved to have a 6.16% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Value: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Value winner was calculated >>

Price

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during six price tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact cost 7.7% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Price: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Price winner was calculated >>

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during six rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 2.24% lower rolling resistance than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact used 6.17% less fuel than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best In Fuel Consumption: Continental AllSeasonContact

See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 emitted 33.18% less particle wear matter than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Best In Abrasion: Michelin CrossClimate 2

See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>