Menu
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN View Gallery (4)
185-2445/35-70 R16-21 125 sizes 2022
Tested by Tire Reviews View Test »

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Previous Firestone Tires Premium Touring Summer

The Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN is a summer premium-touring tire that blends a very reassuring everyday driving character with strong wet-weather security. Real-world drivers rate it highly for confident wet and dry grip, high-speed stability and a comfortable, refined ride that can feel close to premium alternatives. Independent testing supports its clear strengths in aquaplaning resistance and rolling efficiency, making it particularly appealing for motorway use and efficiency-minded drivers.

8.8
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
89%
Wet Grip
87%
Road Feedback
83%
Handling
85%
Wear
92%
Comfort
89%
Buy again
92%
10 Reviews
88% Average
73,200 miles driven
10 Tests (avg: 5th)
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
8.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
83.3
2x / 21 tests
Dry
70.4
1.8x / 10 tests
Value
67.6
0.42x / 7 tests
Comfort
59
0.32x / 8 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
77.8
11 tests
Braking
74.9
10 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 10
Publications: 8
Period: 2024 - 2026
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 10
Avg Rating: 88.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.37
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2026 Summer ECO Tire Test Sport Auto 2026 195/55 R16 4/8 10 metrics
2026 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test Sport Auto 2026 205/45 R17 7/7 12 metrics
2026 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC 2026 225/50 R17 4/16 8 metrics
2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2026 235/45 R18 4/10 14 metrics
2026 Netzwelt Mid Range Summer Tire Test Netzwelt 2026 205/55 R16 3/6 2 metrics
2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tire Test Die Reifentester 2025 205/55 R17 3/7 7 metrics
2025 Al Volante Summer Tire Test al volante 2025 225/55 R18 5/7 7 metrics
2025 EV Tire Test Auto Bild 2025 215/55 R18 6/8 13 metrics
The Best Touring Tires for 2025 Tested Tire Reviews 2025 225/50 R17 6/7 11 metrics
2024 AZ Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2024 225/45 R17 5/9 8 metrics

Videos

The Best Tires for Everyday Driving? 7 Summer Tires Compared and Rated!

The Best Tires for Everyday Driving? 7 Summer Tires Compared and Rated!

In Depth Tire Comparisons
View More Comparisons
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN vs Michelin Primacy 5
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN vs Michelin Primacy 5
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Awards
Satisfactory
The Best Touring Tires for 2025 Tested
2025 · 225/50 R17
All Tests
View Test Results
10
Tests
5th
Average
3rd
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tire Test
235/45 R18 • 2026
4th/10
The Firestone Roadhawk 2 performs at a level that puts it in direct competition with the more expensive premium tires, making it the clear price-performance pick. Its standout result is aquaplaning resistance, where it records the best score in both longitudinal and lateral tests. On the wet handling circuit it combines solid grip with a neutral balance, translating into quick lap times. However, wet braking is a weaker point - the stopping distance is noticeably longer than the best in the group, which is worth bearing in mind. On dry roads the Firestone returns a good rolling resistance value and posts competitive lap times. The lab abrasion figure looks relatively high, but the testers note that the wear is concentrated on the inner tread blocks, meaning the legal minimum tread depth across the full width is less affected than the raw number suggests, and the overall tread life prediction remains good. Comfort is rated below average, suggesting the tire transmits more road noise and surface irregularities than the softer-riding options.
2026 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test
205/45 R17 • 2026
7th/7
Firestone Roadhawk 2 finishes last, rated only "adequate." It shows weak grip reserves and poor steering feedback, particularly on wet surfaces where braking distances are too long - triggering a score penalty. Handling is sluggish and unstable under weight transfer on both wet and dry roads. It does hold two advantages: the best lateral aquaplaning resistance in the test and the lowest rolling resistance, making it the most fuel-efficient option. However, these strengths are not enough to offset the safety-relevant deficits elsewhere.
2026 Netzwelt Mid Range Summer Tire Test
205/55 R16 • 2026
3rd/6
The Firestone Roadhawk 2 offers good balance and consistent steering response on the dry handling course, producing acceptable lap times, though the steering is not as direct as the top performers. Dry braking is at a good level. On wet roads, lateral grip is limited in tight corners and the tire tends to understeer early. Aquaplaning resistance is strong. The tire remains safe and predictable at the limit on both surfaces. Ride comfort is quiet and without major issues. Pass-by noise and rolling resistance are mid-pack.
View Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
205/55R16 94 V XL B A 71
205/55R16 91 V C A 71
205/55R16 91 H C A 71
205/55R16 91 W C A 71
215/60R16 99 V XL B A 71
215/60R16 99 H XL B A 71
205/60R16 92 V C A 71
205/60R16 92 H C A 71
215/70R16 100 H C A 71
205/60R16 96 W XL B A 71
205/60R16 96 V XL B A 71
17 inch
225/60 R17 99 H B A 71
265/65 R17 112 H B A 72
205/50 R17 93 W XL B A 71
215/45 R17 91 Y XL B A 71
225/45 R17 91 Y C A 71
225/50 R17 98 Y XL B A 71
225/45 R17 94 Y XL B A 71
215/55R17 94 W B A 71
235/65R17 108 V XL B A 71
215/55R17 98 W XL B A 71
205/50R17 93 Y XL B A 71
225/60R17 99 V B A 71
18 inch
235/60 R18 107 V XL A A 71
225/40 R18 92 Y XL B A 71
245/45 R18 100 Y XL B A 71
255/35 R18 94 Y XL B A 71
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y XL C A 71
20 inch
255/45 R20 105 W XL B A 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN >>

Questions and Answers for the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Ask a question
March 1, 2025

Does the Firestone Roadhawk 2 tire have rim protection? I haven’t been able to find any photos og it.

The site I have tested did not have any rim protection (225/50 R17.)
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 10 user reviews

Drivers rate the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN very highly overall, describing it as a premium-feeling touring tire at a mid-range price with strong safety and predictability. The most consistent praise is for confident wet-weather grip (including heavy rain/highway use), stable dry handling, and a comfortable ride, with many also highlighting excellent rim protection. Noise is the main recurring drawback, often described as surface-dependent and sometimes more noticeable around 50-60 km/h, though several users still find it quiet.

Strengths
  • Strong wet grip and confidence in heavy rain
  • Comfortable ride and good touring manners
  • Stable
  • Predictable handling and braking in dry and wet
  • Excellent rim protection
  • Good value for money / premium feel for the price
Areas for Improvement
  • Road noise can be surface-dependent and noticeable at some speeds

Top 3 Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN Reviews

Given 92% while driving a Volvo XC90 (2) D5 momentum (275/45 R20) on mostly town for 300 average miles
After driving premium summer tires for years and on various vehicles, I was a bit concerned purchasing and fitting the Roadhawks 2 on a heavy SUV such as XC90. My previous summer tires were Good Year Eagle F1s and I was so and so satisfied with them. They felt a little loose and the feedback was not to my taste. It's been a long winter this year and a long drive on my Nokian WR SUV4s that are firm,heavy, noisy but sturdy and reliable.
Fitting the Firestones - wow!! The comfort, the quiet ride, the response and the dry grip is overwhelming ( to what I was expecting ). I am very pleased with how they perform in the initial phase ( just a few hundred miles in town ). WIll take them out on a motorway for the weekend, and I just can't wait. I imagine that they are half the noise of the Nokians.

The only potential concern will be the wear. I'll watch it closely and report the outcome. All in all, very content with the tires so far.
Helpful 786
April 30, 2025
Given 100% while driving a Ford Ecosport (205/60 R16) on for 10,000 miles
Perfect tires.
Nothing to do with its predecessor.
Highly recommended...
Helpful 856
March 4, 2025
Given 87% while driving a Alfa Romeo Giulia 2.2d 190hp (255/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
I bought a set in sizes 225/45/18 and 255/40/18 last year, just after they came out on the market. I was a little skeptical, but I took the risk.

The tires are very good. I would say they are quite similar to the Bridgestone Turanza. They are comfortable, and the handling is very good. Braking and handling on a wet highway during a summer rain are excellent. As for wear, I can't say yet—I only used them last summer for around 10,000 km.

In my opinion, they are an excellent touring tire
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN image
Helpful 779
February 15, 2025

How would you rate the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN?

Click a star to start your review

217 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 90% while driving a Volkswagen Golf Mk7 1.6 TDI Bluemotion (225/45 R17) on for 4,800 miles
They are basically a Bridgestone Turanza T005 but with great rim protection, and maybe a little less tread depth but not even sure about that (look at the pictures).
The point is: this was my best buy in tires, period. Good price (85€ assembled), excellent result. They are amazing for touring (essentially comparable to a Premium Touring tire) with great grip even in heavy rains (tested multiple times) and competent at high speeds in the dry (tested at 190 give or take). They feel very safe without any surprises. Couldn't be happier. Highly recommended!
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN image Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN additional image Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN additional image Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN additional image Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN additional image
Helpful 15
March 19, 2026
Given 83% while driving a Audi Q5 (255/45 R20) on mostly town for 6,100 average miles
I did not know what to expect from these tires when I bought them, as there were almost no tests and reviews. I am happy to report, that there are no unpleasant surprises with them! Tires grips well both dry and wet, very good road comfort, low rolling resistance, noise comfort is average - depends on the surface and I believe, they got a bit noisier with the wear, but they are not load. Special mention to the rim protection - it is superb! Saved my rims a couple of times from the scratches. Tires does not have a character to them, but they do what you want them to do. Overall, a very good touring tire. After 10000kms and one season, fronts are down to 6.0 mm, rears are at 6.7 mm. With tire rotation, they should have a decent lifespan.
P.S. Special mention to tire width - I did not measure them, but at a glance, my 255 section Firestone's don't look wider than my 235 winter Nokians...
Helpful 170
December 3, 2025
Given 81% while driving a Opel Astra K Sports Tourer 1.6 Turbo (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 11,000 average miles
After two seasons and around 17'500 km (11'000 miles) with the Firestone Roadhawk 2 I can summarize my experience as follows:
This is not the cheapest tire, it's not the quietest and the most comfortable. Also it's not a sports tire. But it is very grippy and stable in heavy rain, at high speed and in extreme situations like emergency breaking on the highway.
After these 17'500 km (11'000 miles) the minimum tread depth of my Firestone tires is 5.5 mm. That means, I can expect to drive at least 45'000 km (28'000 miles) until I reach the 1.6 mm mark. According to the last ADAC summer tire test, this is a good value.
In short: I highly recommend the Roadhawk 2 tires as safe touring tire with good value for money.
Helpful 196
November 10, 2025
Given 84% while driving a Mercedes Benz E350 CDI Coupé 231hp (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,500 spirited miles
After 2 years and ~25k km of running Goodyear Asy 6's, I decided to go for a more touring oriented tire for a bit more comfort. Generally speaking, the Firestone really surpassed my expectations. In normal, relaxed driving conditions, it definitely drove as well as the Asymmetric 6, dry and wet. In more demanding conditions, like very heavy rain on the highway, sporty driving, poor asphalt, etc. it naturally didn't feel as planted as the Asy6, but not too far off, certainly very safe in all cases. After 4000km, the tires look like new. The rim protection is very pronounced which is a huge plus. A drawback I would say is that at around 50-60km/h, they do get a bit noisy, but at usual cruising speeds it's alright.

Overall, looking at the tests, this tire behaves a lot like the Bridgestone T005 it esentially was based on. I could argue that it is a premium-feeling tire at a mid-range price, which honestly is all that anybody needs from a tire. Definitely recommend.
Helpful 192
November 6, 2025
Given 96% while driving a Volvo XC90 (2) D5 momentum (275/45 R20) on mostly town for 4,500 average miles
This is the update review from my initial one that I posted on April 30th 2025.
Now after almost 5000 miles (7500km) I can provide a more confident insight in the performance of these tires. I still state that these are the most comfortable summer tires that I have ever driven. Performance-wise I cannot be more satisfied than this.
The tires are as quiet now as they were at the beginning. I can only hear the wind at the highway drive, and not the wheels rolling. A big plus from me!!

I am not a sporty driver, so car handling was never an issue.Cornering, braking, grip - all very well balanced, both dry and wet. Even though road imperfections are well mitigated I've noticed in exactly 2 occasions I had my front wheels touch the edge of a road rut and I felt my steering wheel trying to pull to the side. It was not dramatical or anything dangerous, but I have never felt it with my car before. I checked the car's suspension and it all seems to be OK, so it must be from the "softness" of the tires.That is why I graded 8 on "Road Feedback"

From the wear and tear perspective, I am happy with that one too. The rubber is on the softer side of the scale, but I am so happy with the tires, that I do not care if they wear down quicker than the competition. I will definitely buy them again when time comes. An excellent tire for a regular/moderate daily driver that respects a quiet and comfortable ride.
Helpful 249
September 26, 2025
Given 77% while driving a BMW 330e (225/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Bought these tires for a BMW in remplacement of the OEM Pirelli P7C2. They are great touring tires with better comfort than the Pirellis despite the harsh M-Chassis tuning from BMW, they make the car almost liveable. These tires are less sporty and show more understeer than the Pirelli. While driving sportily, the front axe reaches its limit of grip on fast tight turns. The rear axle (in 255) is completely stable. Great tire to buy for drivers who seek comfort over agressive driving.
Helpful 262
September 17, 2025
Given 88% while driving a Jaguar XJ 2006 2.7 D Sovereign (255/40 R19) on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
So far, so good,... Very good. Mainly highway with some spirited drive. Only 4000 km so far in 4 different countries. Very happy with the tires. Handling and comfort are excellent (well, it's a Jag), but the noise is dependent on the asphalt and psi in the tires.
Helpful 1020
May 11, 2024
Rate the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN